Data processing: database and file management or data structures – Database design – Data structure types
Reexamination Certificate
2002-04-01
2004-12-14
Alam, Shahid (Department: 2172)
Data processing: database and file management or data structures
Database design
Data structure types
Reexamination Certificate
active
06832224
ABSTRACT:
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates generally to the field of knowledge management and, more specifically, to a method and apparatus for assigning a confidence level to a term within a user knowledge profile.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
The new field of “knowledge management” (KM) is receiving increasing recognition as the gains to be realized from the systematic effort to store and export vast knowledge resources held by employees of an organization are being recognized. The sharing of knowledge broadly within an organization offers numerous potential benefits to an organization through the awareness and reuse of existing knowledge, and the avoidance of duplicate efforts.
In order to maximize the exploitation of knowledge resources within an organization, a knowledge management system may be presented with two primary challenges, namely (1) the identification of knowledge resources within the organization and (2) the distribution and accessing of information regarding such knowledge resources within the organization.
The identification, capture, organization and storage of knowledge resources is a particularly taxing problem. Prior art knowledge management systems have typically implemented knowledge repositories that require users manually to input information frequently into pre-defined fields, and in this way manually and in a prompted manner to reveal their personal knowledge base. However, this approach suffers from a number of drawbacks in that the manual entering of such information is time consuming and often incomplete, and therefore places a burden on users who then experience the inconvenience and cost of a corporate knowledge management initiative long before any direct benefit is experienced. Furthermore, users may not be motivated to describe their own knowledge and to contribute documents on an ongoing basis that would subsequently be re-used by others without their awareness or consent. The manual input of such information places a burden on users who then experience the inconvenience and cost of a corporate knowledge management initiative long before any direct benefit is experienced.
It has been the experience of many corporations that knowledge management systems, after some initial success, may fail because either compliance (i.e., the thoroughness and continuity with which each user contributes knowledge) or participation (i.e., the percentage of users actively contributing to the knowledge management system) falls to inadequate levels. Without high compliance and participation, it becomes a practical impossibility to maintain a sufficiently current and complete inventory of the knowledge of all users. Under these circumstances, the knowledge management effort may never offer an attractive relationship of benefits to costs for the organization as a whole, reach a critical mass, and the original benefit of knowledge management falls apart or is marginalized to a small group.
In order to address the problems associated with the manual input of knowledge information, more sophisticated prior art knowledge management initiatives may presume the existence of a centralized staff to work with users to capture knowledge bases. This may however increase the ongoing cost of knowledge management and requires a larger up-front investment before any visible payoff, thus deterring the initial funding of many an otherwise promising knowledge management initiatives. Even if an initial decision is made to proceed with such a sophisticated knowledge management initiative, the cash expenses associated with a large centralized knowledge capture staff may be liable to come under attack, given the difficulty of quantifying knowledge management benefits in dollar terms.
As alluded to above, even once a satisfactory knowledge management information base has been established, the practical utilization thereof to achieve maximum potential benefit may be challenging. Specifically, ensuring that the captured information is readily organized, available, and accessible as appropriate throughout the organization may be problematic.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
According to a first aspect of the invention, there is provided a method of assigning a confidence level to a term within an electronic document. A first quantitative indicator, based on a number of occurrences of the term within the electronic document, is determined. A characteristic indicator, based on a characteristic of the term, is determined. A second indicator is assigned to the term, the second quantitative indicator being derived from the first quantitative indicator and the characteristic indicator.
According to a second aspect of the invention, there is provided apparatus for assigning a confidence level to a term within an electronic document. A term extractor extracts of the term from the electronic document. Confidence logic determines a first indicator based on a number of occurrences of the term within the electronic document. The confidence logic also determines a characteristic indicator based on a characteristic of the term, and assigns a second quantitative indicator, derived from the first quantitative indicator and the characteristic indicator, to the term.
Other features of the present invention will be apparent from the accompanying drawings and from the detailed description that follows.
REFERENCES:
patent: 4914586 (1990-04-01), Swinehart et al.
patent: 4970681 (1990-11-01), Bennett
patent: 5051891 (1991-09-01), MacPhail
patent: 5247575 (1993-09-01), Sprague et al.
patent: 5247661 (1993-09-01), Hager et al.
patent: 5251131 (1993-10-01), Masand et al.
patent: 5251159 (1993-10-01), Rowson
patent: 5276869 (1994-01-01), Forrest et al.
patent: 5297057 (1994-03-01), Kramer et al.
patent: 5331579 (1994-07-01), Maguire, Jr. et al.
patent: 5333237 (1994-07-01), Stefanopoulos et al.
patent: 5428740 (1995-06-01), Wood et al.
patent: 5438526 (1995-08-01), Itoh et al.
patent: 5473732 (1995-12-01), Chang
patent: 5481741 (1996-01-01), McKaskle et al.
patent: 5488725 (1996-01-01), Turtle et al.
patent: 5493729 (1996-02-01), Nigawara et al.
patent: 5513126 (1996-04-01), Harkins et al.
patent: 5530852 (1996-06-01), Meske, Jr. et al.
patent: 5541836 (1996-07-01), Church et al.
patent: 5544067 (1996-08-01), Rostoker et al.
patent: 5555426 (1996-09-01), Johnson et al.
patent: 5586218 (1996-12-01), Allen
patent: 5608900 (1997-03-01), Dockter et al.
patent: 5628011 (1997-05-01), Ahamed et al.
patent: 5659731 (1997-08-01), Gustafson
patent: 5659732 (1997-08-01), Kirsch
patent: 5692107 (1997-11-01), Simoudis et al.
patent: 5704017 (1997-12-01), Heckerman et al.
patent: 5717914 (1998-02-01), Husick et al.
patent: 5717923 (1998-02-01), Dedrick
patent: 5720001 (1998-02-01), Nguyen
patent: 5724567 (1998-03-01), Rose et al.
patent: 5727129 (1998-03-01), Barrett et al.
patent: 5754938 (1998-05-01), Herz et al.
patent: 5778364 (1998-07-01), Nelson
patent: 5794210 (1998-08-01), Goldhaber et al.
patent: 5812434 (1998-09-01), Nagase et al.
patent: 5835087 (1998-11-01), Herz et al.
patent: 5855008 (1998-12-01), Goldhaber et al.
patent: 5867799 (1999-02-01), Lang et al.
patent: 5913212 (1999-06-01), Sutcliffe et al.
patent: 5931907 (1999-08-01), Davies et al.
patent: 5950200 (1999-09-01), Sudai et al.
patent: 5974412 (1999-10-01), Hazlehurst et al.
patent: 5995597 (1999-11-01), Woltz et al.
patent: 5999932 (1999-12-01), Paul
patent: 5999975 (1999-12-01), Kittaka et al.
patent: 6006200 (1999-12-01), Boies et al.
patent: 6006221 (1999-12-01), Liddy et al.
patent: 6014644 (2000-01-01), Erickson
patent: 6021439 (2000-02-01), Turek et al.
patent: 6026374 (2000-02-01), Chess
patent: 6038560 (2000-03-01), Wical
patent: 6052122 (2000-04-01), Sutcliffe et al.
patent: 6052709 (2000-04-01), Paul
patent: 6052714 (2000-04-01), Miike et al.
patent: 6115709 (2000-09-01), Gilmour et al.
patent: 6154783 (2000-11-01), Gilmour et al.
patent: 6205472 (2001-03-01), Gilmour et al.
patent: 6253202 (2001-06-01), Gilmour et al.
patent: 6377949 (2002-04-01), Gilmour
patent: 6421669 (2002-07-01), Gilmour et al.
patent: 6640229 (2003-10-01), Gilmour et
Alam Shahid
Blakely , Sokoloff, Taylor & Zafman LLP
Fleurantin Jean Bolte
Tacit Software, Inc.
LandOfFree
Method and apparatus for assigning a confidence level to a... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Method and apparatus for assigning a confidence level to a..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Method and apparatus for assigning a confidence level to a... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3274527