Stock material or miscellaneous articles – Composite – Of metal
Reexamination Certificate
2002-08-29
2004-04-27
Tarazano, D. Lawrence (Department: 1773)
Stock material or miscellaneous articles
Composite
Of metal
C428S213000, C428S910000, C428S516000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06726998
ABSTRACT:
FIELD OF INVENTION
The invention relates to polyolefinic multilayer film comprising a core layer of polypropylene and at least one outer layer. More specifically, the invention relates to a biaxially oriented polypropylene film that does not distort in the presence of food oils.
BACKGROUND OF INVENTION
Biaxially oriented polypropylene film laminations are commonly used in the snack food packaging industry. In particular, potato chip packaging is a very large volume application.
In the case of potato chip packaging, oils such as cottonseed oil, corn oil, and soybean oil are present on the potato chip surface. Some of this oil on the potato chip surface transfers to the package's internal surfaces. Similarly, other types of baked food snack products also have oils that are known to swell the polypropylene. Since these food oils are non-polar, the polypropylene film absorbs them quite readily, particularly at elevated temperatures. This absorption of food oils by the film gives a distorted appearance to the entire package by causing dimpling in the film.
This surface distortion effectively destroys the surface gloss of the package and gives the appearance that the package has been mishandled. This distortion is undesirable to snack food manufacturers, as they would like to represent the product as being fresh or new to the shelf.
Oriented polypropylene films currently available on the market have attempted to address this issue in two ways. First, by stiffening the film such that the distortions are not so visible to the human eye. Second, by preventing the migration of the food oils into the polypropylene layer(s) of the film.
The stiffening of the film is typically done by adding inorganic fillers such as calcium carbonate, titanium dioxide, etc., to the core layer of the film. The addition of fillers not only provide increased stiffness but could also provide opacity, e.g., by creating voids using CaCO
3
, and whiteness, e.g., by using TiO
2
. See, U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,303,708 (Gebhardt), 4,377,616 (Ashcraft), 4,632,869 (Park), 4,652,489 (Crass), 5,134,173 (Joesten), and 6,048,608 (Peet). The common features of these patents is that they use fillers in a core layer for creating opacity in the film and have a void-free layer on the surface of the film that would contact the food products.
Typically, for preventing migration of the food oils to the polypropylene layer(s) of the film, a metallized layer such as an aluminum layer is applied to the inside the film in contact with the food products. The oil does not penetrate though an intact aluminum layer. However, the problems of applying the metallized layer on the inside of the film are the following. First, the metallized layer tends for form cracks through which the oils leak into the polypropylene layer(s) of the film. Second, it is preferred to have the metallized layer on the side of the film that will be the outside surface of the food package. This is because the metallized layer provides a glossy background to the images printed on the surface of the food package.
The idea behind the prior art films was the following. If one can prevent migration of the oils from the food products into the film using a solid, void-free layer on the film surface that would be in contact with the food products, then one should be able to minimize migration of oils into the film. Thereby, one can prevent distortion of the film. If distortion is still visible, the prior art films attempted to minimize distortion by stiffening the films by adding fillers to the core layer.
The approach utilized by the prior art films discussed above has the following impacts. It generally does not prevent migration of the oils into the core layer, but the distortion is suppressed by stiffening the film and increasing the thickness of the film. Stiffening the film makes the film heavier and less flexible while increasing the film thickness increases the cost of the film. Therefore, it is the objective of this invention to provide an economical solution to this package distortion problem caused by the oils of the food product being packaged.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
This invention provides a film that does not distort in the presence of food oils, particularly at elevated temperature conditions. This invention further maintains the necessary properties of the film including oxygen barrier, moisture barrier, cold seal adhesion, and heat seal performance. Achieving these objectives will result in a package with very good surface aesthetics, excellent heat seal or cold seal adhesion performance, and exceptional barrier performance.
As explained above, the prior art structures use fillers to make the film stiff and opaque. In addition, the prior art structures use a void-free layer on the film surface contacting the food products to prevent migration of the food oils into the film.
The applicants of this invention have arrived at a novel approach than that adopted by the prior art structures to solve the problem of distortion. Applicants have found that blending a certain quantity of a crystalline wax in a non-polar polyolefin produces a film having excellent oil resistance that exhibits substantially no distortion. Applicants have successfully produced such a film structure that is capable of making a finished package product having the following characteristics: 1) strong seals, 2) excellent barrier, 3) excellent lamination bond strength, 4) excellent print quality, and 5) excellent gloss or surface aesthetics.
Applicants have also determined that increasing the thickness of the lamination can reduce this distortion. Thus, increasing the lamination thickness lends additional structural support to the lamination and reduces the distortion of the entire package. However, increasing the thickness of the lamination is uneconomical since consuming more raw materials is always considerably more expensive.
As will be realized, this invention is capable of other and different embodiments, and its details are capable of modifications in various obvious respects, all without departing from this invention. Accordingly, the description is to be regarded as illustrative in nature and not as restrictive.
REFERENCES:
patent: 5141801 (1992-08-01), Takeshita et al.
patent: 5763516 (1998-06-01), Godfrey
patent: 6033514 (2000-03-01), Davis et al.
patent: 6159612 (2000-12-01), Chu et al.
patent: 6312825 (2001-11-01), Su et al.
patent: 0 189 242 (1986-07-01), None
patent: WO 96/27491 (1996-09-01), None
patent: WO 00/32395 (2000-06-01), None
Kitchin Kevin
Moreau Leo
Su Tien-Kuei
Morrison & Foerster / LLP
Tarazano D. Lawrence
Toray Plastics (America) Inc.
LandOfFree
Polyolefin oil resistant film using a wax-containing layer does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Polyolefin oil resistant film using a wax-containing layer, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Polyolefin oil resistant film using a wax-containing layer will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3196191