Optics: measuring and testing – By light interference – For dimensional measurement
Reexamination Certificate
2000-11-28
2003-10-14
Font, Frank G. (Department: 2877)
Optics: measuring and testing
By light interference
For dimensional measurement
Reexamination Certificate
active
06633389
ABSTRACT:
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to measuring the surface profile properties of features. The proposed metrology method compensates for phase changes associated with the presence of multiple or varying materials on the surface of a substrate and in particular, to a metrology method to measure dishing, erosion, and/or an actual height profile of features on a sample.
BACKGROUND
The metal interconnect of integrated circuits has conventionally been realized by blanket depositing a layer of metal on a planar insulating surface. Portions of the metal layer are subsequently removed in a photolithographically patterned etching step to form the resulting metal conductors. Conventional integrated circuits have generally employed somewhat resistive metal, such as aluminum, or metal alloys for the metal interconnect. Copper has been chosen as a replacement metal for aluminum in smaller geometry devices. Due to complexities associated with etching copper, it must be patterned in a different manner. Copper is blanket deposited over the wafer that has trenches and vias etched into the dielectric and then it is subjected to chemical mechanical polishing (CMP) to remove the copper from the upper planar surface. The goal is to have a globally planar surface composed of copper and dielectric regions.
FIGS. 1A through 1G
show a cut-away view of the conventional fabrication of an aluminum interconnect. As shown in
FIG. 1A
, a relatively planar surface layer 10, which may be, e.g., a silicon substrate, is covered with a dielectric layer
12
, e.g., an oxide layer, which is patterned and etched. An aluminum layer
14
, which may be an aluminum alloy, is blanket deposited over the dielectric layer
12
, as shown in
FIG. 1B. A
photoresist layer
16
is deposited over the aluminum layer
14
(FIG.
1
C), and is exposed and developed resulting in the structure shown in FIG.
1
D. The aluminum layer
14
is then etched, e.g., using a plasma etching technique, resulting in the structure shown in FIG.
1
E. The remaining photoresist layer
16
is removed resulting in the structure shown in FIG.
1
F. After these steps are completed, the surface is composed of metal lines with near vertical sidewalls above the surface of the dielectric layer
12
, as shown in FIG.
1
F. Subsequently, dielectric layers are deposited and etched over the metal lines to yield a dielectric layer
18
with a planarized surface, e.g., for the next metal layer, as shown in FIG.
1
G.
A major change is being implemented in semiconductor processing by switching from aluminum to copper metallization. Copper is preferred to aluminum due to its lower resistivity and better electromigration resistance. Unfortunately, copper is difficult to etch and the switch from aluminum to copper has forced a change in the basic metallization process. Copper cannot simply be substituted for aluminum in the metallization process because plasma etching of copper is more difficult than plasma etching of aluminum (due to the lack of volatile copper halogen compounds). Additionally, if copper is allowed to directly contact the dielectric materials, it can rapidly diffuse through dielectric materials and contaminate the semiconductor devices.
Thus, a “damascene” process has been developed whereby copper can be used as the interconnect metal. Rather than blanket depositing the interconnect metal on a substantially planar insulating substrate and then etching away parts of the metal layer to leave the conductors, trenches are formed in an insulating material. A composite layer of a diffusion barrier, nucleation layer and copper are then blanket deposited over the entire surface of the insulating substrate such that the trenches are filled. Chemical mechanical polishing is then used to planarize the integrated circuit surface and thereby polish away all the metal that is not in the trenches. The result is metal conductors disposed in trenches and a globally planarized surface.
FIGS. 2A through 2C
show a cut-away view of the conventional fabrication of a copper interconnect. As shown in
FIG. 2A
, a relatively planar surface layer
50
, which may be, e.g., a silicon substrate, is covered with a dielectric layer
52
, e.g., an oxide layer, which is patterned and etched. The dielectric layer
52
may be patterned and etched in multiple steps in order to produce trenches
54
and via
55
. A diffusion barrier layer (not shown), nucleation layer (not shown), and copper layer
56
are blanket deposited over the dielectric layer
52
such that the trenches
54
and via
56
are filled, as shown in
FIG. 2B. A
chemical mechanical polishing step is then used to planarize the surface of the copper layer
56
(along with the diffusion barrier layer and nucleation layer) with dielectric layer
52
, resulting in the structure shown in FIG.
2
C.
The ideal copper CMP process removes the copper, nucleation layer and diffusion barrier from the surface of the dielectric while leaving behind the copper, nucleation layer and diffusion barrier in the trenches and contacts or vias. The ideal result would be a globally planarized surface with no vertical height change over the entire wafer surface.
FIG. 3
shows the ideal resulting structure with a planar surface composed of a dielectric region
52
and idealized copper region
56
. Global planarity is desirable because of the depth of field requirements associated with the lithographic steps. Significant height variations on the surface will compromise the photoresist processing steps and subsequently the etching and metallization processes. Height variations are also symptomatic of undesirable variations in the copper thickness and metal line resistance.
Unfortunately, because of the complexities associated with the CMP process, global planarity is not achievable. An artifact of the CMP processes in copper metallization results from the copper and dielectric material having different polishing rates, resulting in what is known as “dishing.”
FIG. 4
shows a cut-away side view of the typical resulting structure after the CMP process, in which the surface of the copper region
56
a
is lower than the surrounding dielectric region
52
a
. It should be understood that
FIG. 4
is for exemplary purposes and is not to scale. Dishing may generally be defined as the maximum height difference between the metal region
56
a
and the adjacent dielectric region
52
a
after CMP processing.
Another artifact caused by the CMP process, as known to those of ordinary skill in the art, is “dielectric erosion,” i.e., the dielectric regions exhibit a change in height over the surface of the wafer. This variation is related to the local density of metal features. Areas containing no metal features exhibit the highest dielectric surfaces, areas of low metal density exhibit relatively high dielectric surface regions and areas of high metal density result in relatively low dielectric surface regions.
The processing of silicon wafers to form integrated circuit chips requires many complex processing steps, for example, those described above. Each step must be carefully monitored and controlled to maximize the quality and yield of the final product. With the imminent replacement of aluminum by copper to form the metallization layers on silicon wafers, new processes and metrology techniques must be developed and implemented to characterize the degree of surface planarization after the CMP step.
Accordingly, what is needed is an economical, reliable, rapid, precise and accurate metrology procedure that can characterize and control individual steps during processing of a sample and specifically that will can be used to measure dishing, erosion, curvature, and/or the actual height profile of features on the sample.
SUMMARY
A profiling method, in accordance with the present invention, compensates for phase changes associated with the presence of multiple materials or materials, such as transparent or composite materials, having varying thickness in an area of a substrate to be measured. The phase profile of the area of interest is f
Poris Jaime
Rampoldi Claudio L.
Font Frank G.
Lyons Michael A.
Nanometrics Incorporated
Silicon Valley Patent & Group LLP
LandOfFree
Profiling method does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Profiling method, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Profiling method will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3136266