Method and apparatus for matching projects and workers

Data processing: financial – business practice – management – or co – Automated electrical financial or business practice or... – Health care management

Reexamination Certificate

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

C705S007380, C705S002000

Reexamination Certificate

active

06567784

ABSTRACT:

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Field of the Invention
This invention relates to the field of matching projects and workers. In particular, the invention relates to a web enabled system for matching projects and workers.
2. Description of the Related Art
Matching is a difficult process because it requires that a computer, or human, identify combinations that will work well. Because of the complexity of the problem, most prior systems do not attempt to actually perform any matching, but rather they provide a forum in which parties can meet.
Traditionally newspaper classified ads were one way of brining parties together, e.g. buyers and sellers, employers and employees, etc. More recently, online systems such as bulletin boards, newsgroups, web classifieds, and even online auctions have provided for parties to meet.
All of these rely on the parties to make matches. No centralized attempt is made to match parties. For example, Jane Doe might post a want to buy classified ad while Jim Brown might post a for sale classified ad, both for a Toyota Camry. Unless Jane sees Jim's ad, or vice versa, they will not know of the other's ad and have an opportunity to complete a transaction. Online systems can offer search functions that can improve the chances that Jane may find Jim's ad, or vice versa. However, unless Jane, or Jim, uses the search function, they will not know of the other's ad.
The matching problem is equally prevalent in the employment area. For example, a contractor developing a web site might need a subcontractor to develop artwork for the web site. Finding that subcontractor can be difficult and the global reach of the Internet has greatly broadened the ability to work with geographically dispersed employees.
However, the prevalence of the Internet can also increase business risks. Traditional contracting and employment was done based on reputation, past performance, references, and other qualitative measures. The anonymity allowed by the Internet can make it difficult to ascertain information in an efficient manner. The prior systems that were used to bring buyers and sellers together provide no mechanism for incorporating quantitative measures of performance into the matches.
Accordingly, what is needed is a method for allowing parties to match projects to workers that allows for the inclusion of quantitative measures in the matching.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
A method of matching projects and workers using both mandatory, or binary, characteristics and quantitative characteristics is described. The projects and workers have a number of characteristics that are symmetric. For example, the project has an activity characteristic that defines what is to be done and the worker has an activity characteristic describing what she/he wants to do. Project creators and workers can request matching workers and projects, respectively. The matching process itself occurs in two stages. In the first stage, the mandatory characteristics are considered. Only workers, or projects, meeting the mandatory characteristics are selected for further evaluation at the next stage. At the second stage, the quantitative characteristics are evaluated for the workers, or projects. The result is a subset of the total number of workers, or projects, matching the project criterion, or worker needs, ranked based on the quantitative characteristics. The size of the subset can be restricted to show only the top n or the top x% of matching workers, or projects, from the first stage.


REFERENCES:
patent: 5117353 (1992-05-01), Stipanovich et al.
patent: 5164897 (1992-11-01), Clark et al.
patent: 5913201 (1999-06-01), Kocur
patent: 6092197 (2000-07-01), Coueignoux
patent: 0866411 (1998-09-01), None
Buhler, Selecting the right person for the job: No small challenge, Jan. 1998, Supervision, vol. 59 No. 1, pp. 7-9.*
Huo and Kearns, Optimizing the Job-Person Match with Computerized Human Resource Information Systems, 1992, Personnel Review, vol. 21 No. 2, pp. 3-18.*
Infonautics Launches Job Sleuth, The Internet-Wide Job Search Agent, May 1999, PR Newswire.*
Parkes, Job-shopping Web-style: Web sites match companies and job seekers in ways previously impossible, Jan. 1997, DBMS, vol. 10 No. 1.*
Fry, Buying the Goods—Person to Person, Dec. 1998, The Wall Street Journal, p. R12.*
McManus, Melanie, “Recuitment Jambalaya,”Credit Union Management, May 1998, vol. 21, No. 5, pp. 48-51.

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Method and apparatus for matching projects and workers does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Method and apparatus for matching projects and workers, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Method and apparatus for matching projects and workers will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3071199

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.