Adhesive bonding and miscellaneous chemical manufacture – Methods – Surface bonding and/or assembly therefor
Reexamination Certificate
2000-06-02
2002-08-27
Lorengo, Jerry A. (Department: 1734)
Adhesive bonding and miscellaneous chemical manufacture
Methods
Surface bonding and/or assembly therefor
C156S238000, C156S247000, C156S289000, C156S540000, C156S541000, C156S542000, C156S583200, C156SDIG002, C156SDIG002, C156SDIG003, C156SDIG003
Reexamination Certificate
active
06440249
ABSTRACT:
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Field of Invention
The present invention relates to apparatus used in the automated application of labels to objects. More particularly, the present invention relates to apparatus for applying adhesive-backed labels to merchandise-containing packages on an automated merchandise-encapsulating assembly line.
2. Description of Related Art
In the modem assembly-line production of products for the mass-market, an important stage is the encapsulation of the products and the labeling of the encapsulating materials. Although a good deal, and often all, of the information needed on the package (UPC, source identification, etc.) can be printed on the wrapping material itself, there often remains the need to affix other labels. These labels include in particular, but are not limited to, theft-mitigation tags and the like. Until recently, such tags were applied by the end retailer, either to the outside of the product or to the outside of the product's packaging. Lately, there has developed a demand by large retailers that these labels be already affixed when the products arrive from the manufacturer or wholesale-distributor. Furthermore, In those cases where the label is to be affixed to the product itself or even to an internal surface of the product, it is completely impracticable for the retailer to carry out this step. For these reasons and others, there is a great incentive to devise label-applicators (“labelers”) operable in the rapid, automated fashion necessary to their incorporation in an assembly line.
The first label-applying devices intended to be incorporated into assembly/packaging lines reflected the diversity of label designs in use. In other words, the initial devices were designed with the hope that they could be used with most or all of the types of automated labels in common use, with the result that all these devices fall short of being ideal for any particular type of label. In addition, there are other drawbacks to the existing label-applicators, to be described below.
Labels of the type under discussion are supplied in the form of rolls of lift-off tape to which the individual labels are affixed. Conventional labeling devices for applying adhesive-backed labels use a peeler-bar to dislodge each label in turn from this lift-off tape as the item to be labeled passes through the labeling device. Once dislodged, each label is typically allowed to fall freely under the force of gravity (to go into “free-fall”) until it is grabbed by the apparatus, such as a suction device, that is going to affirmatively apply the label to the item. (Alternatively, the label is deposited onto a platform from which it is then engaged by such apparatus.) In any event, the label is then held in position while it is adhering to the item to be labeled. If the label is not aligned properly at the point where pressure is applied to it and the adhering occurs, it will be affixed crookedly and/or imperfectly.
The traditional labeling devices also suffer from being complex and hence relatively prone to breakdown. Part of the complexity is due to the incorporation of a number of sub-systems, such as pneumatic-driven and gear-driven transfer mechanisms, heating elements, and more. This makes the devices more expensive at the outset and more expensive to maintain.
Solomon (U.S. Pat. No. 5,370,754; issued 1994) teaches a labeling machine that moves a label across a peeler-bar to dislodge it from its backing strip. After the label is dislodged, it free-falls until it comes to rest on a platform, from which it is picked up by a suction device and transferred to the item to be labeled. The free-fall, no matter how momentary, that occurs after the label is dislodged from the peeler-bar is a source of inaccurate label placement. The misplacement can be due to air currents, to misalignment, or to other factors. Complicated adjustments to the peeler-bar are often required to avoid this problem after the labeler equipment has been put into operation. Solomon further teaches that the transfer of the label from the detaching station to the application station is performed by a Cartesian robot having an arm with a suction function. This robot is an example of the sub-systems that can significantly add to the price of the labeling device as well as to its complexity-related breakdown rate..
Yamaguchi (U.S. Pat. No. 5,300,181; issued 1994) teaches a labeling device wherein each label is positioned by means of a suction plate prior to affixation. Although this overcomes the misplacement problems associated with free-fall, the use of a suction plate for holding the label in position introduces dependency on a vacuum-“generating” system and thus makes the device vulnerable to vacuum leaks and other failures in the pneumatic/vacuum system. Additionally, the fact that the device of Yamaguchi relies on multiple pressing in conjunction with an elastic body, introduces another possibilty of failure, that due to the elastic body.
Lindstrom (U.S. Pat. No. 4,595,447; issued 1986) discloses a labeling device that uses a vacuum foot at the end of a vertically oriented spindle that moves along a horizontal track to transfer a label from a printed-label dispenser to the article to be labeled. In addition to requiring a vacuum or other means for producing a pressure differential, such a transfer mechanism—one that translates the label in two dimensions—has many parts, thus increasing the chances of mechanical failure or faulty operation of the apparatus.
The device of Karp (U.S. Pat. No. 4,367,118; issued 1983) also uses a pressure differential to secure each label between the time it is removed from the backing strip and the time it is placed on the item to be labeled. Additionally, the suction device of Karp that transfers the label from the stripper bar to a label-transfer station. The motion of this transfer is both horizontal and vertical, and requires drive mechanisms for both directions of movement. The inclusion of these drive mechanisms adds to the cost of the label applicator and, as well, to its chances for failure during operation.
Therefore, what is needed is a labeling machine that can be integrated with a packaging machine, that avoids the alignment problems associated with “free-fall,” and does not require the use of transfer drive mechanisms, nor inefficient peripheral systems such as vacuum “generators” used by existing labeling machines.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The present invention meets the goals set out above by providing labeling apparatus with relatively few mechanical parts, and no requirement of pneumatic systems to hold a label. Furthermore, the present invention provides a simplified manner of moving a strip of labels through a such an apparatus. Moreover, the present invention can be used in conjunction with semi-rigid labels (e.g., foil, paper, and anti-theft labels that incorporate circuitry) or rigid labels (e.g., anti-theft magnetic-strip-containing labels) such as are commonly used on and in the packaging of consumer products, and on the products themselves. The present invention provides a label-application device that can stand alone or be integrated into systems requiring fully automatic operation. The apparatus of the present invention mechanically removes an adhesive-backed label from a lift-off strip and places it in the position desired, typically though not necessarily on the outside of packaging. The mechanical removal of the label from the strip eliminates the inaccurate label placement associated with the label free-fall intrinsic to most existing labeling machines. The mechanical removal of the label also eliminates the possible need to apply heat to the lift-off strip to facilitate removal of the label. Additionally, this invention mechanically holds a label in position until the label is pressed directly onto a parcel. This eliminates the need for a suction device and the need for a peripheral vacuum source. Because the current invention eliminates the complicated adjustments associated with free-fall and the need for peripheral heat and vacuum
Bohan Thomas L.
Engineered Automation of Maine, Inc.
Lorengo Jerry A.
Mathers Patricia M.
LandOfFree
Apparatus and method for applying labels does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Apparatus and method for applying labels, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Apparatus and method for applying labels will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2935597