Pulse or digital communications – Spread spectrum – Direct sequence
Reexamination Certificate
1998-10-02
2002-03-26
Ghebretinsae, Temesghen (Department: 2631)
Pulse or digital communications
Spread spectrum
Direct sequence
C375S148000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06363104
ABSTRACT:
BACKGROUND
Wireless communications is expanding at a phenomenal rate, as more radio spectrum becomes available for commercial use and as cellular phones become commonplace. For example, in the United States, wireless phone service is offered both in the cellular (800 MHz) and PCS (1900 MHz) bands.
In addition, there is currently an evolution from analog communications to digital communications. Speech is represented by a series of bits, which are modulated and transmitted from a base station to a phone. The phone demodulates the received waveform to recover the bits, which are then converted back into speech. There is also a growing demand for data services, such as e-mail and Internet access, which require digital communications.
There are many types of digital communications systems. Traditionally, frequency-division-multiple-access (FDMA) is used to divide the spectrum up into a plurality of radio channels corresponding to different carrier frequencies. These carriers may be further divided into time slots, referred to as time-division-multiple-access (TDMA), as is done in the D-AMPS, PDC, and GSM digital cellular systems. Alternatively, if the radio channel is wide enough, multiple users can use the same channel using spread spectrum techniques and code-division-multiple-access (CDMA).
Direct-sequence (DS) spread-spectrum modulation is commonly used in CDMA systems, in which each information symbol is represented by a number of “chips.” Representing one symbol by many chips gives rise to “spreading,” as the latter typically requires more bandwidth to transmit. The sequence of chips is referred to as the spreading code or signature sequence. At the receiver, the received signal is despread using a despreading code, which is typically the conjugate of the spreading code. IS-95 and J-STD-008 are examples of DS CDMA standards.
With DS CDMA systems, coherent Rake reception is commonly used. The received signal is despread by correlating to the chip sequence, and the despread value is weighted by the conjugate of a channel coefficient estimate, removing the phase rotation of the channel and weighting the amplitude to indicate a soft or confidence value. When multipath propagation is present, the amplitude can vary dramatically. Multipath propagation can also lead to time dispersion, which causes multiple, resolvable echoes of the signal to be received. Correlators are aligned with the different echoes. Once the despread values have been weighted, they are summed. This weighting and summing operation is commonly referred to as Rake combining.
A typical digital communications system
100
is shown in FIG.
1
. Digital symbols are provided to transmitter
101
, which maps the symbols into a representation appropriate for the transmission medium or channel (e.g. radio channel) and couples the signal to the transmission medium via antenna
102
. The transmitter signal passes through channel
103
and is received at antenna
104
. The received signal is passed to receiver
105
. The receiver
105
includes a radio processor
106
, a baseband signal processor
110
, and a post processing unit
112
.
The radio processor tunes to the desired band and desired carrier frequency, then amplifies, mixes, and filters the signal down to baseband. At some point, the signal is sampled and quantized, ultimately providing a sequence of baseband received samples. Since the original radio signal has in-phase (I) and quadrature (Q) components, the baseband samples typically and I and Q components, giving rise to complex, baseband samples.
The baseband processor
110
is used to detect the digital symbols that were transmitted. It may produce soft information as well, which gives information regarding the likelihood of the detected symbol values.
The post processing unit
112
performs functions that depend highly on the particular communications application. For example, it may use the soft detected values to perform forward error correction decoding or error detection decoding. It may convert digital symbols into speech using a speech decoder.
Coherent detection requires estimation of how the symbols were modified by the transmitter, channel, and/or radio processor. As discussed previously, the transmission medium introduces phase and amplitude changes in signal, as a result of multipath propagation. The signal may also have become dispersed, giving rise to signal echoes, each echo having a phase and amplitude associated with it, represented by a complex channel coefficient. Each echo also has a delay associated with it. Coherent demodulation requires estimation of these delays and coefficients. Typically, the channel is modeled as discrete rays, with channel coefficients assigned to the different delays.
A conventional baseband processor,
200
, is illustrated in FIG.
2
. This is the standard baseband processor in a typical, coherent Rake receiver. The baseband signal is provided to a bank of correlators
202
, which correlate different delays of the received signal to the despreading code, producing correlations, also referred to as despread values. The delays are provided by channel delay estimator
204
, which uses known methods to estimate the delays, such as finding delays which give large despread values. The despread values corresponding to different delays are combined in combiner
206
using a weighted sum. The weights are the conjugates of channel coefficient estimates provided by channel coefficient estimator
208
. For example, correlations to a pilot signal can be used to obtain channel coefficients.
Consider a simple example, in which the received chip-spaced baseband samples during one symbol period are represented by r(k). These samples are modeled as:
r
(
k
)=
bc
0
s
(
k
)+
bc
1
s
(
k−
1)+
w
(
k
) (1)
where b is the symbol sent, c
0
and c
1
are the channel coefficients, the delays are 0 and 1 chip period, s(k) is the chip sequence used to spread the symbol, and w(k) is a sequence of impairment (noise+interference) samples.
The bank of correlators produces two despread values, denoted x
0
and x
1
, corresponding to the two rays. These can be expressed as:
x
0
=
1
L
∑
k
=
0
L
-
1
s
*
(
k
)
r
(
k
)
(
2
)
where superscript “*” denotes complex conjugation and L is the despreading factor. Division of L is shown for illustrative purposes, while in practice it is well known how to extend results to the case when the division is omitted.
x
1
=
1
L
∑
k
=
0
L
-
1
s
*
(
k
)
r
(
k
+
1
)
(
3
)
The combiner combines the two despread values using estimates of the channel coefficients, denoted ĉ
0
and ĉ
1
, to produce a detection statistic that corresponds to an information symbol. This can be expressed as
z=ĉ*
0
x
0
+ĉ*
1
x
1
(4)
The symbol value that is closest to z gives the detected value {circumflex over (b)}. For BPSK modulation, b is either +1 or −1, so that the detected value is given by the sign of z.
Channel coefficients can be estimated separately using standard approaches. For example, with least mean square (LMS) estimation of c
0
, one would form the time varying estimate ĉ
0
(n), where n is an index denoting symbol period, using
ĉ
0
(n+1)=
ĉ
0
(
n
)+&mgr;
{circumflex over (b)}*(
n
)(
x
0
(
n
)−
ĉ
0
(
n
)
{circumflex over (b)}(
n
)) (5)
where &mgr; is the LMS step size. Also {circumflex over (b)} is the detected symbol value.
It can be shown that the conventional, coherent Rake receiver is optimal when the impairment samples are uncorrelated. However, for cellular communication systems, the impairment includes interference from one's own base station as well as interference from other base stations. This interference is typically noise-like at the transmitter. However, at the receiver, the interference has passed through dispersive channels, which introduce correlation. Thus, for cellular systems, the impairment samples are correlated and the conventional Rake re
Coats & Bennett P.L.L.C.
Ericsson Inc.
Ghebretinsae Temesghen
LandOfFree
Method and apparatus for interference cancellation in a rake... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Method and apparatus for interference cancellation in a rake..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Method and apparatus for interference cancellation in a rake... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2829237