Catheter cleaning devices

Surgery – Means for introducing or removing material from body for... – Treating material introduced into or removed from body...

Reexamination Certificate

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

C604S533000, C604S905000

Reexamination Certificate

active

07922701

ABSTRACT:
The present invention provides catheter cleaning devices that are effective at reducing microbial contamination of a catheter port entry. For example, the invention provides a catheter, a catheter cleaning device and a catheter cleaning injection port cap, each of which reduces potential microbial contamination at a catheter port entry.

REFERENCES:
patent: 4334551 (1982-06-01), Pfister
patent: 4340052 (1982-07-01), Dennehey et al.
patent: 4432759 (1984-02-01), Gross et al.
patent: 4432764 (1984-02-01), Lopez
patent: 5071411 (1991-12-01), Hillstead
patent: 5375589 (1994-12-01), Bhatta
patent: 5383851 (1995-01-01), McKinnon et al.
patent: 5554135 (1996-09-01), Menyhay
patent: 5630813 (1997-05-01), Kieturakis
patent: 5743892 (1998-04-01), Loh et al.
patent: 6753306 (2004-06-01), Simpson
patent: 6916051 (2005-07-01), Fisher
patent: 2003/0144647 (2003-07-01), Miyahara
patent: 2006/0293559 (2006-12-01), Grice et al.
patent: 2007/0112333 (2007-05-01), Hoang et al.
patent: 2007/0148432 (2007-06-01), Baker et al.
patent: 2008/0039803 (2008-02-01), Lynn
patent: 2 073 893 (1981-10-01), None
Arduino et al., “Microbiologic evaluation of needleless and needle-access devices,”Am. J. Infect. Control. 26:377-380 (1997).
Arnow et al., “Consequences of intravascular catheter sepsis.”Clin Infect Dis. 16:778-784 (1993).
Bouza et al., “A needleless closed system device (CLAVE) protects from intravascular catheter tip and hub colonization: a prospective randomized study.”J. Hosp. Infect. 54:279-287 (2003).
Brismar et al., “Bacterial contamination of intravenous line side ports of different designs.”Clin. Nutr. 6:31-33 (1982).
Casey et al., “A randomized, prospective clinical trial to assess the potential infection risk associated with the PosiFlow needleless connector,”J Hosp. Infect. 54:288-293 (2003).
CDC. “Guidelines for the prevention of intravascular catheter-related infections,”MMWR51(10), 1-29 (2002).
CDC. “National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance System (NNIS) report, data summary from Oct. 1986-Apr. 1998, issued Jun. 1998.”Am. J. Infect. Control. 26:522-533 (1998).
Chaiyakunapruk et al., “Chlorhexidine compared with povidone-iodine solution for vascular catheter-site care: A meta-analysis,”Ann. Intern. Med. 136:792-801 (2002).
Danzig et al., “Bloodstream infections associated with needleless intravenous infusion system in patients receiving home infusion therapy.”JAMA273:1862-1864 (1995).
De Cicco et al. “Source and route of microbial colonization of parenteral nutrition catheters.”Lancet2:1258-1261 (1989).
Digiovine, “The attributable mortality and costs of primary nosocomial blood stream infections in the intensive care unit.”Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med160:976-981 (1999).
Do et al., “Bloodstream infection associated with needleless device use and the importance of infection-control practices in the home health care setting,”J. Infect. Dis. 179:442-448 (1999).
Forse et al., “Staphylococcus epidermidis: An important pathogen,”Surgery86:507-514 (1979).
Garland et al., “A randomized trial comparing povidone-iodine to a chlorehexidine gluconate-impregnated dressing for prevention of central venous catheter infections in neonates.”Pediatrics107:1431-1437 (2001).
Inoue et al., “Prevention of catheter-related sepsis during parenteral nutrition: effect of a new connection device.”JPEN16:581-585 (1992).
Kellerman et al., “Bloodstream infections in home infusion patients: the influence of race and needleless intravascular access devices.”J. Pediatr. 129:711-717 (1996).
Kluger and Maki, “A meta-analysis of the risk of intravascular device (IVD)-related blood stream infection (BSI) based on 223 published prospective studies”In: Abstracts of the 39th Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. San Francisco, CA: American Society for Microbiology, 514, p. 647 abstract 1913 (1999).
Linares et al., “Pathogenesis of catheter sepsis: a prospective study using quantitative and semi-quantitative cultures of catheter hub and segments.”J. Clin. Microbiol. 21:357-360 (1985).
Little and Palmer, “Central line exit sites: which dressing?”Nursing Standard12:42-44, (1998).
Llop et al., “Colonization and bacteremia risk factors in parenteral nutrition catherization,”Clin. Nutr. 20:527-534 (2001).
Maki et al., “Prospective, randomized, investigator-masked trial of a novel chlorehexidine-impregnated dressing (Biopatch) on central venous and arterial catheters (abstr).”Crit. Care Med. 28:A42 abstract 50 (2000).
Maki et al., “A prospective, randomized trial of a 1% chlorehexidine-75% alcohol tincture vs. 10% povidone-iodine for cutaneous disinfection and dollow-up site care with central venous and arterial catheters (abstr).”Crit. Care Med. 28:A42 abstract 52 (2000).
Merlino et al., “In vitro quantitative model of catheter infection during simulated parenteral nutrition,”J. Clin. Microbiol. 26(9):1659-1664 (1988).
Mermel, “Correction: Catheter related bloodstream infections.”Ann. Intern. Med. 133:395 (2000).
Mermel, “Prevention of intravascular catheter-related infections.”Ann. Intern. Med. 132:391-402 (2000).
Moro et al., “Risk factors for central venous catheter-related infections in surgical and intensive care units.”Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol. 15:253-264 (1994).
Raad and Darouiche, “Prevention of infections associated with intravascular devices,”Curr. Opin. Crit. Care2:361-365 (1996).
Rello et al., “Evaluation of outcome of intravenous catheter-related infections in critically ill patients.”Am J. Respir Crit. Care Med. 162:1027-1030 (2000).
Rupp et al., “Effect of a second-generation venous catheter impregnated with chlorhexidine and silver sulfadiazine on central catheter-related infections: a randomized, controlled trial,”Ann. Intern. Med., 143(8):570-580 (2005).
Saint, “Prevention of Intravascular Catheter-Related Infections,” AHRQ Publication No. 01-E058, Chapter 16, Jul. 2001. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD. http://www.ahrq.gov/clinic/ptsafety/chap16a.htm.
Salzman and Rubin, “Relevance of the catheter hub as a portal for microorganisms causing catheter-related bloodstream infections,”Nutrition13:15S-17S (1997).
Segura et al., “In vitro bacteriological study of a new hub model for intravascular catheters and infusion equipment,”J. Clin. Microbiol. 27:2656-2659 (1989).
Segura et al., “A clinical trial on the prevention of catheter-related sepsis using a new hub model.”Ann. Surg. 223(4):363-369 (1996).
Segura et al., “Assessment of a new hub design and the semiquantitative catheter culture method using an in vivo experimental model of catheter sepsis.”J Clin. Microbiol. 28:2551-2554 (1990).
Sitges-Serra and Linares, “Bacteria in total parenteral nutrition catheters: where do they come from?”Lancet1:531 (1983).
Sitges-Serra et al., “Hub colonization as the initial step in an outbreak of catheter related sepsis due to coagulase negative staphylococci during parenteral nutrition.”J Parenter. Enteral Nutr. 8:668-672 (1984).
Sitges-Serra et al., “Catheter sepsis: the clue is the hub,”Surgery97:355-357, (1985).
Sitges-Serra, “Strategies for prevention of catheter-related bloodstream infections,”Support Care Cancer7:391-395 (1999).
Soufir et al., “Attributable morbidity and mortality of catheter-related septicemia in critically ill patients: a matched, risk-adjusted, cohort study,”Infect. Control. Hosp. Epidemiol. 20:396-401 (1999).
Stotter et al., “Junctional care: the key to prevention of catheter sepsis in intravenous feeding,”J Parenter. Enteral Nutr. 11:159-162 (1987).
Tan et al., “Molecular epidemiolog

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Catheter cleaning devices does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Catheter cleaning devices, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Catheter cleaning devices will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2731521

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.