Sequence-determined DNA fragments encoding cyclopropyl...

Details Sequence-determined DNA fragments encoding cyclopropyl... Sequence-determined DNA fragments encoding cyclopropyl...

2011-04-26

2011-04-26

Prouty, Rebecca (Department: 1652)

Organic compounds -- part of the class 532-570 series

Organic compounds

Carbohydrates or derivatives

C435S233000

Reexamination Certificate

active

07932370

ABSTRACT:
The present invention provides DNA molecules that constitute fragments of the genome of a plant, and polypeptides encoded thereby. The DNA molecules are useful for specifying a gene product in cells, either as a promoter or as a protein coding sequence or as an UTR or as a 3′ termination sequence, and are also useful in controlling the behavior of a gene in the chromosome, in controlling the expression of a gene or as tools for genetic mapping, recognizing or isolating identical or related DNA fragments, or identification of a particular individual organism, or for clustering of a group of organisms with a common trait.

REFERENCES:
patent: 4801540 (1989-01-01), Hiatt et al.
patent: 5034323 (1991-07-01), Jorgensen et al.
patent: 5231020 (1993-07-01), Jorgensen et al.
patent: 5283184 (1994-02-01), Jorgensen et al.
patent: 5410270 (1995-04-01), Rybicki et al.
patent: 5445943 (1995-08-01), Hoenes et al.
patent: 5723766 (1998-03-01), Theologis et al.
patent: 5766847 (1998-06-01), Jackle et al.
patent: 5859330 (1999-01-01), Bestwick et al.
patent: 6004804 (1999-12-01), Kumar et al.
patent: 6010907 (2000-01-01), Kmiec et al.
patent: 2004/0034888 (2004-02-01), Liu et al.
patent: 2004/0216190 (2004-10-01), Kovalic
patent: 95/35505 (1995-12-01), None
patent: 98/07842 (1998-02-01), None
patent: 99/07865 (1999-02-01), None
patent: 99/58723 (1999-11-01), None
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/371,334, dated Jan. 8, 2009, 8 pages.
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/761,165, dated Feb. 4, 2009, 5 pages.
Response to Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/370,216, dated Jan. 15, 2010, 7 pages.
Response to Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/371,200, dated Dec. 17, 2009, 6 pages.
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/362,546, dated Mar. 19, 2009, 6 pages; and Response to Office Action filed May 11, 2009, 4 pages.
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/045,487, dated Mar. 31, 2009, 10 pages.
Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 11/370,253, dated Apr. 17, 2009, 6 pages.
Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 11/371,356, dated Apr. 14, 2009, 6 pages.
Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 11/371,624, dated Apr. 8, 2009, 6 pages.
Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/370,216, dated Apr. 21, 2010, 15 pages.
Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/371,200, dated Mar. 25, 2010, 11 pages.
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/040,538, dated Jun. 19, 2009, 18 pages; and Response to Office Action filed Aug. 5, 2009, 5 pages.
Final office action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/362,546, dated Aug. 7, 2009, 8 pages.
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/153,185, document dated Dec. 28, 2006, 5 pages; Mar. 28, 2007 Response to Office Action dated Dec. 28, 2006, 16 pages; Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 11/153,185, dated Jun. 19, 2007.
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/180,101, document dated Dec. 28, 2006, 5 pages; Mar. 28, 2007 Response to Office Action dated Dec. 28, 2006, 15 pages; Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 11/180,101, dated Jun. 19, 2007.
U.S. Appl. No. 60/121,700, filed Feb. 25, 1999, Bouckaert et al.
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/180,418, document dated May 17, 2007, 11 pages; Sep. 17, 2007 Response to Office Action dated May 17, 2007, 8 pages.
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/362,437, document dated Apr. 9, 2007, 15 pages; Jul. 9, 2007 Response to Office Action dated Apr. 9, 2007, 7 pages; Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 11/362,437, dated Aug. 9, 2007.
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/358,685, document dated Apr. 5, 2007, 6 pages; Aug. 3, 2007 Response to Office Action dated Apr. 5, 2007, 7 pages.
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/357,909, document dated Apr. 9, 2007, 5 pages; Jul. 9, 2007 Response to Office Action dated Apr. 9, 2007, 6 pages.
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/357,357, document dated May 17, 2007, 9 pages; Sep. 17, 2007 Response to Office Action dated May 17, 2007, 6 pages.
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/357,747, document dated Apr. 9, 2007, 20 pages; Aug. 3, 2007 Response to Office Action dated Apr. 9, 2007, 8 pages.
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/362,546, document dated Nov. 15, 2006, 6 pages; Feb. 14, 2007 Response to Office Action dated Nov. 15, 2006, 5 pages.
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/362,546, document dated May 2, 2007, 6 pages; Jul. 2, 2007 Response to Office Action dated May 2, 2007, 4 pages.
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/368,322, document dated Apr. 4, 2007, 25 pages.
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/367,760, document dated Apr. 10, 2007, 26 pages; Jul. 10, 2007 Response to Office Action dated Apr. 10, 2007, 10 pages; Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 11/367,760, dated Oct. 5, 2007.
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/368,321, document dated Aug. 29, 2007, 4 pages.
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/369,193, document dated Nov. 15, 2006, 7 pages; Feb. 14, 2007 Response to Office Action dated Nov. 15, 2006, 5 pages.
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/369,173, document dated Nov. 15, 2006, 14 pages; Feb. 14, 2007 Response to Office Action dated Nov. 15, 2006, 8 pages.
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/369,173, document dated May 3, 2007, 9 pages.
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/370,240, document dated Sep. 27, 2007, 8 pages.
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/372,369, document dated Apr. 5, 2007, 12 pages; Jul. 5, 2007 Response to Office Action dated Apr. 5, 2007, 7 pages; Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 11/372,369, dated Aug. 23, 2007.
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/396,378, document dated May 2, 2007, 5 pages; Aug. 2, 2007 Response to Office Action dated May 2, 2007, 4 pages; Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 11/396,378, dated Sep. 26, 2007.
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/396,357, document dated May 7, 2007, 5 pages; Jul. 2, 2007 Response to Office Action dated May 2, 2007, 4 pages; Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 11/396,457, dated Sep. 24, 2007.
Ahn et al., “Homoeologous relationship of rice, wheat and maize chromosomes”Molecular and General Genetics, 241:483-90 (1993).
Albert et al., “Site-specific integration of DNA into wild-type and mutant lox site placed in the plant genome”The Plant Journal, 7:649 (1995).
Alonso-Blanco et al. (Methods in Molecular Biology, vol. 82, “ArabidopsisProtocols”, pp. 137-146, J.M. Martinez-Zapater and J. Salinas, eds., c. 1998 byHumana Press, Totowa, NJ).
Ausubel et al. (Current Protocols in Molecular Biology,Greene Publishing, New York (1992), TOC only.
Azpiroz-Leehan et al., “T-DNA insertion mutagenesis inArabidopsis: going back and forth”Trends in Genetics, 13:152 (1997).
Bonner et al., “Reduction in the Rate of DNA reassociation by Sequence Divergence”J. Mol. Biol.,81:123 (1973).
Bradshaw et al., “A new vector for recombination-based cloning of large DNA fragments from yeast artificial chromosomes”Nucl. Acids. Res.,23:4850-4856 (1995).
Burke et al., “Cloning of large segments of exogenous DNA into yeast by means of artificial chromosome vectors”Science, 236:806-812 (1987).
Burr (“Mapping Genes with Recombinant Inbreds”, pp. 249-254. In Freeling, M. and V. Walbot (Ed.), The Maize Handbook, c. 1994 by Springer-Verlag New York, Inc.: New York, NY, USA; Berlin Germany.
Burr et al., “Gene mapping with recombinant inbreds in maize”Genetics, 118:519 (1998).
Carels et al., “Compositional properties of homologous coding sequences from plants”J. Mol. Evol.,46:45 (1998).
Christou, “Strategies for variety-independent genetic transformation of important cereals, legumes and woody species utilizing particle bombardment”Euphytica, 85(1-3):13-27, (1995).
De Martinis et al., “Silencing gene expression of the Ethylene-forming enzyme results in a reversible inhibition of ovule development in transgenic tobacco plants”The Plant Cell, 11:1061 (1999).
deVicente and Tanksley “QTL analysis of transgressive segregation in an interspecific tomato cross”Genetics, 134:585 (1993).
Evans et al., Protoplasts Isolation and Culture in “

Affiliated with

Also associated with

Rating

Sequence-determined DNA fragments encoding cyclopropyl... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Sequence-determined DNA fragments encoding cyclopropyl..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Sequence-determined DNA fragments encoding cyclopropyl... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

Comments { 0 }

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2718920