Systems and methods for specifying states within imperative...

Data processing: software development – installation – and managem – Software program development tool

Reexamination Certificate

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

Reexamination Certificate

active

07949991

ABSTRACT:
Systems and methods which implement declarative language for specifying states within imperative code are shown. According to embodiments an application program developer declaratively identifies one or more states within the imperative code of the application program. Declarative language identifying a particular state of an application program may both operate to identify the state and to describe the state so that the state may be selected or “jumped to” without a user having to navigate the application program flow to arrive at the state. Particular states may be described using a difference or “delta” between the particular state and another state, such as a base state. Transitions may be implemented between states, such as to provide animation, fading, color change, et cetera.

REFERENCES:
patent: 6192408 (2001-02-01), Vahalia et al.
patent: 6195685 (2001-02-01), Mukherjee et al.
patent: 6564246 (2003-05-01), Varma et al.
patent: 7234133 (2007-06-01), Klein et al.
patent: 7464366 (2008-12-01), Shukla et al.
patent: 2002/0069263 (2002-06-01), Sears et al.
patent: 2002/0116354 (2002-08-01), Baudu et al.
patent: 2003/0105755 (2003-06-01), Daynes
patent: 2003/0105805 (2003-06-01), Jorgenson
patent: 2004/0002944 (2004-01-01), Hauser et al.
patent: 2004/0068494 (2004-04-01), Tozawa et al.
patent: 2004/0068563 (2004-04-01), Ahuja et al.
patent: 2004/0153504 (2004-08-01), Hutchinson et al.
patent: 2004/0181579 (2004-09-01), Huck et al.
patent: 2004/0237063 (2004-11-01), Klein
patent: 2005/0038796 (2005-02-01), Carlson et al.
patent: 2007/0006078 (2007-01-01), Jewsbury et al.
patent: 2007/0226218 (2007-09-01), Chatterjee et al.
Jeremy Allaire, “Macromedia Flash MX-A next-generation rich client”, Mar. 2002, retrieved from http://download.macromedia.com/pub/flash/whitepapers/richclient.pdf on Jul. 2, 2009.
Kramer, Doug, “How to Write Doc Comments for Javadoc”, (Jan. 24, 2001 as dated by Internet Archive), http://web.archive.org/web/20010124043000/http://java.sun.com/j2se/javadoc/writingdoccomments/index.html., downloaded Mar. 3, 2008, 25 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/437,185, filed May 19, 2006.
Office Action dated Dec. 22, 2008 in related U.S. Appl. No. 11/437,185.
Office Action dated Apr. 1, 2009 in related U.S. Appl. No. 11/437,185.
Office Action dated May 28, 2009 in related U.S. Appl. No. 11/437,185.
Office Action dated Sep. 1, 2009 in related U.S. Appl. No. 11/437,185.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/192,985, filed Jul. 29, 2005.
Office Action dated Apr. 28, 2009 in related U.S. Appl. No. 11/192,985.
Office Action dated Sep. 2, 2008 in related U.S. Appl. No. 11/192,985.
Advisory Action dated Jun. 9, 2008 in related U.S. Appl. No. 11/192,985.
Office Action dated Mar. 25, 2008 in related U.S. Appl. No. 11/192,985.
Office Action dated Oct. 4, 2007 in related U.S. Appl. No. 11/192,985.

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Systems and methods for specifying states within imperative... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Systems and methods for specifying states within imperative..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Systems and methods for specifying states within imperative... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2685863

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.