Electricity: measuring and testing – Fault detecting in electric circuits and of electric components – Of individual circuit component or element
Reexamination Certificate
1998-05-29
2001-10-23
Karlsen, Ernest (Department: 2858)
Electricity: measuring and testing
Fault detecting in electric circuits and of electric components
Of individual circuit component or element
C324S758010, C324S1540PB
Reexamination Certificate
active
06307386
ABSTRACT:
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates generally to testing of printed circuit boards for use in electronic products and, specifically, to a press for engaging a printed circuit board to a probe card assembly.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
After printed circuit boards have been manufactured, and before they can be used or placed into assembled products, they must be tested to verify that all required electrical connections have been properly completed and that all necessary electrical components have been attached or mounted to the board in proper position and with proper orientation.
Other reasons for testing are to determine and verify whether the proper components have been used and whether they are of the proper value. It is also necessary to determine whether each component performs properly (i.e., in accordance with the specification). Some electrical components also may require adjustment after installation.
Most testers utilize a “bed-of-nails” design, which includes a probe surface having plural (thousands) of sockets that are interconnected to test equipment, such as a computer with the appropriate software. Test probes are insertable in these sockets and protrude upwardly from the probe surface. These probes are configured to match the input/output connection points of the electronic components, such as integrated circuits, resident on the printed circuit board (PCB) being tested. Further, the probes are biased upwardly such that, to ensure proper alignment, a card must be placed over the probes and sufficient downward force must be provided to the PCB such that proper electrical connection is made between the inputs/outputs of the electronic components and the test equipment, via the biased test probes.
Fixturing systems have been developed for purposes of handling printed circuit boards for testing. The most common of such fixturing systems is a vacuum fixture. There are many disadvantages associated with vacuum fixturing. In vacuum fixturing, atmospheric pressure acts directly on a PCB with a vacuum beneath it, forcing the board against spring loaded testing probes. Problems arise from the need to maintain a seal around and across the board. Maintaining a vacuum seal in an automated environment is even more troublesome. Warped printed circuit boards are commonly encountered and require a separate effort or effect to push and seat them in the fixture gasketing material. PCBs with holes or apertures generally complicate vacuum fixturing techniques because of the difficulty associated with maintaining a proper seal. Also, probe density is limited by atmospheric pressure. The seals and gasketing required also involve much periodic maintenance, and contaminants and other foreign matter may be aspirated by the fixture due to the vacuum. Furthermore, vacuum fixtures generally do not provide sufficiently forceful contact between the probes and PCBs to displace contaminants present on the board surfaces, thereby necessitating additional costs and chemical disposal issues associated with pre-cleaning the boards before testing.
In response to the aforementioned problems associated with vacuum fixturing systems, other fixturing systems have been developed, including pneumatically powered systems. The typical pneumatic fixturing system incorporates a flat plate attached to a cylinder. Pneumatic pressure is applied to the cylinder which in turn forces the plate against the printed circuit board disposed on the probes. Testing problems arise from the fact that the center of the plate receives the majority of the force applied by the cylinder. Accordingly, the periphery of the board may not sufficiently contact and be tested by the probes. This is especially true with large and/or thin PCBs. Further, such pneumatic systems are not height adjustable relative the probes and thus are unable to accommodate boards of varying thicknesses and/or component heights.
It is conventional practice for humans to manually handle the printed circuit boards for testing, i.e., selecting and delivering the PCBs to a test fixture, loading the PCBs into the tester, interacting with the tester by making any required adjustments, removing the PCBs from the tester, attaching any required repair ticket to the PCB, and sorting the PCBs into pass or fail outputs.
There are, of course, several disadvantages and limitations associated with manual handling and probing of the printed circuit boards. Manual testing is tedious and the speed with which a human can perform this task is limited. Additionally, humans may create costly errors by rejecting an acceptable PCB, by accepting a defective PCB or by inserting a PCB into a test fixture with improper orientation.
In response to the aforementioned problems associated with manual handling of circuit boards, automated processes for handling and testing the PCBs have been developed. Such processes often incorporate robotic and assembly line elements. The primary disadvantage of implementing such an automated process stems from the nature of the machinery necessary for carrying out such a process. For a given set of testing parameters particular to a customer, only a few core equipment elements are necessary. However, as the customer's testing needs change, so do their equipment needs. Presently, there does not exist an efficient and inexpensive means by which the customer can modify the equipment to meet such changing needs; the most cost-effective solution to such a problem is to replace the current equipment with higher capability equipment. Alternatively, the customer with initially modest testing needs may, at the outset, buy equipment including all currently available accessories in anticipation of someday requiring such accessories. However, a customer having minimal or no experience with the core set of equipment may not be comfortable with using such advanced accessories, thereby fostering testing procedure inefficiencies. Additionally, the customer's testing requirements may never ripen into a need for such extra equipment, rendering the initial expenditure unnecessary.
Accordingly, what is needed in the art is a printed circuit board testing system that enables rapid and evenly distributed pressing of the boards to the test probes, allows adjustability of the press height so as to accommodate differently sized boards, and is modifiable to multiple configurations so as to enable multiple modes of operation.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
According to the principles of the present invention, a modular multi-configuration upgradeable testing system for quickly and accurately testing printed circuit boards in conjunction with a conventional probe card testing assembly is disclosed.
In the preferred embodiment of the invention, a testing system is disclosed incorporating a modular primary frame having multiple mounting surfaces and mounted on a conventional probe card testing assembly. At least one modular press assembly is attached to the primary frame. The press assembly is height adjustable relative the testing assembly and has a plurality of synchronized force-applying members. A modular conveyor assembly comprising at least one conveyor rail pair may be attached to at least one primary frame mounting surface. The rail pair is configured to deliver a printed circuit board (PCB) to the testing assembly and to withdraw a printed circuit board from the testing assembly. A modular interface assembly comprising a bar code reader, a PCB marker or other similar devices may be disposed within the primary frame and is height adjustable relative the testing assembly. A modular secondary frame attached to at least one primary frame mounting surface may house the interface. A controller controls and coordinates the testing functions of the testing assembly in addition to controlling and coordinating the delivery and withdrawal functions of the conveyor rail pair and the functions associated with the modular interface assembly.
REFERENCES:
patent: 4357575 (1982-11-01), Uren et al.
patent: 4471298 (1984-09-01), Frohlich
patent: 4818933 (1989-04-01),
Fowler Dwight
Jacobsen Chris R.
Tracewell Jerry G.
Agilent Technologie,s Inc.
Karlsen Ernest
Tang Minh
LandOfFree
Modular mechanical fixturing and automated handling of... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Modular mechanical fixturing and automated handling of..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Modular mechanical fixturing and automated handling of... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2560193