Fluid handling – Line condition change responsive valves – Direct response valves
Reexamination Certificate
1998-09-28
2001-07-17
Rivell, John (Department: 3753)
Fluid handling
Line condition change responsive valves
Direct response valves
C137S071000, C137S513700, C239S204000, C239S572000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06260575
ABSTRACT:
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to a fluid control system, and in particular to a fluid flow control valve. In one application, the fluid flow control valve can check the free flow of water from a broken or damaged riser of an overhead irrigation system.
2. Description of Related Art
Overhead irrigation systems often incorporate water spray devices (e.g., sprinkler heads) mounted on risers. A riser supports a sprinkler some distance above the ground, e.g., one to three feet high. At this elevated position, the sprinkler has an enlarged spray pattern and irrigates a larger area than if the sprinkler were positioned closer to the ground. Riser mounted sprinklers also accommodate crops of varying heights.
Risers are pipes or conduits, typically made of plastic such as polyvinylchloride (“PVC”), copper or galvanized steel. In many irrigation systems, the riser extends upward from a fitting of the irrigation system, such as from a “T” or an elbow juncture, located under ground. In such an arrangement, water flows from a subterranean irrigation pipe through the riser to the sprinkler.
While the use of a riser-mounted sprinkler head enlarges the area irrigated by the sprinkler, the riser is susceptible to mechanical damage because it extends above ground in an exposed position. No external structure typically braces or buttresses the riser. Plastic or metal risers are thus easily broken (e.g., severed) or otherwise damaged (e.g., theft, vandalism, etc.), resulting most often in an open, free-flowing outlet.
When a riser is broken or the sprinkler is removed, water cannot be properly distributed through the sprinkler head. The rate of water flow increases without the restricting back pressure provided by the sprinkler, such that a large stream of water projects above the broken riser. The resulting water geyser impacts against a relatively small ground surface. Serious flooding and erosion consequently results in a small area, while the remainder of the area normally irrigated by the sprinkler goes unwatered. A significant amount of water is wasted as the result of the unrestricted flow through the broken riser, and substantial soil erosion can occur.
In addition, the water fountain gushing from the broken riser also can pose a serious highway problem if the water sprays onto highway lanes, or if the resulting water and soil run-off flows onto the highway. Numerous automobile accidents occur each year due to broken irrigation system risers.
While valves exist in the prior art for control of fluid flow in general, many such valves are inappropriate for restricting the flow of irrigation water through broken risers. Additionally, high volume farm irrigation systems introduce special needs for flow control. Prior valves are overly complicated and expensive for application to farm irrigation systems, which utilize hundreds of riser-mounted sprinklers. Some devices which have been implemented for stanching the unrestricted flow of irrigation water have proven unreliable, often failing to stop or even slow the rate of water flow when a riser breaks or other failure occurs. Other prior devices are too sensitive, shutting down water flow to undamaged risers.
In addition, when prior devices do function to stop the flow of water through a broken riser, the broken sprinkler often remains undetected for days, leaving the area surrounding the broken sprinkler unwatered. This danger is especially true of farm irrigation, where a single broken riser in a large field with many sprinklers could easily escape notice for many days, damaging crops in the vicinity.
Further deficiencies in prior devices include an inability of these devices to cope with transient flow conditions. For instance, the prior devices may prematurely shut off the valve in response to the combination of air and water in the system that often occurs when the system is first turned on. In addition, prior devices often include improperly restrained components which vibrate and wear under normal flow conditions.
Prior devices also have close fitting parts which are subject to corrosion. As a result, the small space between the parts cannot be maintained as corrosion, scale, debris, etc., often fill the space between the closely fit parts, and the device is likely to malfunction. For example, in a prior valve, a disc or poppet is shaped and sized to have a close fit with the valve seat in order to arrest fluid flow under abnormal flow conditions. Upon corrosion, however, the disc or poppet will not properly seal the valve seat, thereby allowing fluid flow within the valve. Under some conditions, such corrosion, scale formation, or like collected debris will prevent the valve disc or poppet from moving at all.
A need therefore exists for a simple, inexpensive yet reliable irrigation control valve which allows water to flow to an operational sprinkler, but restricts the water flow through a broken riser. Ideally, such a valve should allow detection of the broken riser, even when the flow is essentially shut off.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The present fluid flow control valve is simply structured yet reacts only to the presence of an abnormal flow condition through the system which is indicative of a mechanical system failure (e.g., an open pipe, a removed or stolen sprinkler head, a broken riser, etc.). Under normal flow conditions, the valve remains open. This is true for both steady-state and transient flow conditions. Thus, during transient flow, which occurs when the system is initiated, the valve stays open even though the flow rate through the valve may momentarily exceed a flow rate which is indicative of an abnormal condition. The valve does not prematurely close.
In one mode, the fluid flow control device includes a valve seat defining the passageway therethrough and a movable stopper that selectively cooperates with the valve seat to at least substantially close the passageway. A rod is positioned at least in part between the stopper and the valve seat, and is movable relative to the stopper. The rod prevents the stopper from seating against the valve during both steady-state and transient normal flow conditions. Therefore, even during transient normal flow conditions, the rod prevents the stopper from seating against the valve seat.
The fluid flow control valve does not have any close fitting parts, thereby reducing the likelihood of valve malfunction. In addition, fluid can flow through the support to spin or agitate the stopper. Agitation of the stopper prevents build up beneath the stopper of sediment and debris.
In accordance with another aspect of the present invention, a fluid flow control device includes a housing having a first portion adapted to cooperate with a fitting of a fluid delivery system and a second portion adapted to cooperate with a branch section of the fluid delivery system. A valve seat is located within the first portion of the housing. A stopper, which is positioned a distance away from the valve seat, is movable between a first position, in which the stopper is located a distance away from the valve seat, and a second position, in which the stopper seats against the valve seat. Because the valve seat is located within the first portion of the housing, the fluid flow control valve of this design can continue to function even if the housing is severed between the first and second portions.
An additional aspect of the present invention involves a fluid flow control valve that includes a fitting having an influent port and an effluent port. A main passageway extends from the influent port and a branch passageway extends from the effluent port. In one embodiment, the main passageway and branch passageway may be normal to one another. In other embodiments, the main and branch passageways may intersect at other angles. In addition, the main passageway can terminate at the intersection between the main and branch passageways, such as an elbow fitting, or it may continue past the intersection such as a T-fitting.
A support is fixed to a housing having a valve
Brown Joseph P.
Gyben Christopher J.
Norum Edward M.
Knobbe Martens Olson & Bear LLP
Rivell John
Schoenfeld Meredith M
Whetstone Group International, Inc.
LandOfFree
Fluid flow control valve does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Fluid flow control valve, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Fluid flow control valve will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2559636