Coating processes – Spraying
Reexamination Certificate
1998-10-02
2001-01-09
Dudash, Diana (Department: 1762)
Coating processes
Spraying
C118S326000, C239S120000, C454S050000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06171656
ABSTRACT:
BACKGROUND
Millions of gallons of paint are sprayed every year worldwide, thereby generating airborne pollution from the paint overspray. Outdoor spray painting of large structures (e.g. bridges, water towers, railroad cars, buildings, and ships) faces stringent discharge regulations limiting the emission of airborne pollutants. Failure to meet such discharge regulations can lead to notices of violation, fines, negative publicity, increased operating costs and delays in work completion. Also, overspray from spray painting often contains toxic particulates and volatile organic compounds which are very difficult to prevent from dispersing into the atmosphere.
In fluid dynamic terms, the three categories of spray painting are airblast atomization, pressure atomization, or some combination of the two. The first category is termed “conventional airspray” in the industry, while the second is known as “airless” paint spraying. Hybrid approaches make up the third category. Transfer efficiency for spray painting is known as the percentage of the total paint sprayed which eventually adheres to the work surface. The paint which does not adhere to the work surface and escapes to the environment is the overspray. Conventional airspray has a transfer efficiency typically in the range of only 20-30%, which has become environmentally unacceptable. Airless spray, on the other hand, has a transfer efficiency often above 50% or better, but with considerable room for improvement. Professional spray-painting equipment is classified by the method of paint atomization (e.g. airspray, airless, air-assisted airless, etc.). In essentially all cases, the spray from a spray gun is shaped in the form of an elongated spray ellipse or “fan” to ease the application of a uniform coating. Whether hand-held or manipulated robotically, the spray gun is traversed in the direction of the short axis of this ellipse, while held perpendicular to the work surface at a fixed spraying distance usually of about twelve (12) inches.
Current industrial spray painting practice involves the use of large temporary containment enclosures to prevent the escape of overspray. These temporary containment enclosures are usually clumsy and ineffective, as they take a brute-force approach rather than invoking aerodynamics of the process to capture the overspray near its source. Such containment enclosures are also labor-intensive to use, have questionable effectiveness and are very costly. No real solution has been presented for painting large outdoor structures or objects. Most of the prior art deals with overspray during the coating of small to moderate-sized indoor objects which are enclosed in a spray booth. An improved technical solution to the problem of spray painting large outdoor objects or structures is seriously needed to meet today's overspray containment standards.
An object of the present invention is to provide an apparatus and method to manage and capture overspray from a spraying device during coating operations of a surface.
Another object of the present invention is to provide an apparatus and method for capturing overspray while coating large outdoor surfaces and structures.
Another object of the present invention is to provide an apparatus for capturing overspray, whereby the apparatus moves with the spraying device during the coating process.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The present invention is an overspray collector for collecting overspray. The overspray collector includes a shroud, at least one spray device enclosed by the shroud, at least one overspray removal outlet for removing the overspray and at least one air inlet slot for allowing inlet air to enter the shroud and balance the removal of air associated with the removal of the overspray. The shroud includes a back, two sides, and two end caps. The shroud also includes at least one baffle between the air inlet slots and the overspray removal outlets, for separation of the inlet air from the overspray stream being removed. The overspray collector also includes a suction device and ducting leading from the overspray removal outlets to the suction device for inducing the overspray stream from the shroud.
The present invention is also a method of collecting overspray when spraying a coating of spray onto a work surface from at least one spray device mounted within a shroud. The air within the shroud
14
is entrained into the spray to produce a co-flowing stream directed towards the work surface. The co-flowing stream impinges on the work surface, wherein larger particles of the spray are applied to the work surface and finer particles of the spray remain with the co-flowing stream to form an overspray stream which turns and flows laterally along the work surface. The overspray stream is intercepted with the shroud which forces the overspray stream to separate from the work surface due to an imposed adverse pressure gradient. The intercepted overspray stream is directed to at least one outlet of the shroud for removal of the overspray stream from the shroud. Whereby, a suction force is applied to the outlets to induce the overspray stream through the outlets and out of the shroud.
REFERENCES:
patent: 3842798 (1974-10-01), Gerlovich
patent: 3861594 (1975-01-01), Wendling
patent: 4069974 (1978-01-01), Zawacki
patent: 4643082 (1987-02-01), Lynham et al.
patent: 5352257 (1994-10-01), Powers
patent: 5360165 (1994-11-01), Singhal
patent: 5393345 (1995-02-01), Smith
patent: 5489234 (1996-02-01), Hockett
patent: 5536315 (1996-07-01), Guzowski et al.
patent: 5688323 (1997-11-01), Kane et al.
Kwok, K.C,., “How Atomization Affects Transfer Efficiency,” Industrial Finishing, pp. 28, 30, 32, (May 24, 1992).
Hicks, P.G., “Simulation of Paint Transfer in an Air Spray Process,” Fluid Mechanics and Heat Transfer in Sprays, ASME, pp. 145-154, (Dec. 24, 1993).
Settles, G.S., “A Flow Visualization Study of Airless Spray Painting,” Proceedings of 10th Ann. Conf. on liquid Atomization and Spray Syst., ILASS-Americans'97 (Canada), pp. 145-149, (May 18, 1997).
Settles, G.S., “An Overflow of Planar Laser Scattering for the Visualization of High-Speed Airflows,” Flow Visualization VI, Springer-Verlag, pp. 628-633, (Dec. 24, 1992).
Lefebvre, A.H., “Atomization and Sprays,” Hemisphere Pub. Corp. (NY), pp. 59-78, (Dec. 24, 1989).
Dexter, R.W., “Measurement of Extensional Viscosity of Ploymer Solutions and its Effects on Atomization from a Spray Nozzle,” Atomizationa and Sprays, Begell House, Inc, pp. 167-191, (Dec. 24, 1996).
Mansour, A., “Air-blast Atomization of Non-Newtonian Liquids,” Jornal of Non-Newtonian fluid Mechanics, Elsevier, pp. 161-194, (Dec. 24, 1995).
Viscoelastic Breakup in a High Velocity Airstream, “Matta, J.E.,” J. of Applied Polymer Science, John Wiley & Sons, pp. 397-405, (Dec. 24, 1982).
Macgregor, S.A., “Air Entrainment in Spray Jets,” Int. J. Heat and Fluid Flow, 3rd ed., Butterworth-Heinermann, vol. 12 (No. 3), pp. 279-283, (Sep. 24, 1991).
Wen, F., “Particle Dispersion By Vortex Structures in Plane Mixing Layers,” J. of Fluids Engineering, pp. 657-666, (Dec. 24, 1992).
Glauert, M.B., “The Wall Jet,” J. of Fluid Mechanics, pp. 625-643, (Dec. 24, 1956).
Daws, L.F., “Movement of Airstreams Indoors,” J. Inst. Heating & Ventilation Engrs., pp. 241-253, (Dec. 24, 1970).
Calcagni Jennifer
Dudash Diana
Monahan Thomas J.
The Penn State Research Foundation
LandOfFree
Method and apparatus for collecting overspray does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Method and apparatus for collecting overspray, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Method and apparatus for collecting overspray will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2557427