Data processing: generic control systems or specific application – Specific application – apparatus or process – Mechanical control system
Reexamination Certificate
1998-02-12
2001-07-24
Grant, William (Department: 2121)
Data processing: generic control systems or specific application
Specific application, apparatus or process
Mechanical control system
C340S628000, C340S690000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06266579
ABSTRACT:
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to a system for controlling the utility connections to a site such as a building. More particularly, it relates to such a system for coping with emergency situations such as earthquakes, fires, and floods.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Natural disasters can strike quickly and without warning. A quick and well-reasoned response to the emergency situation is critical to preserving life and health. Unfortunately, people may have difficulty reacting quickly under such circumstances; it may even be impossible to observe, let alone analyze, all of the environmental factors necessary to take proper action. Such situations suggest technological solutions.
Shutoff devices for coping with specific local events are well known. For example, a fuse or circuit breaker will disconnect electricity in case of an over-current condition. A gas valve may disconnect a gas line in the event of a sudden pressure drop. A water valve may disconnect a water line in case of a rupture or a flood.
Such devices, although possibly helpful, are generally ill adapted to handling the complex interactions found in a disaster event. They shut-off a single utility in response to a simple fault condition in the utility. However, a disaster situation can be quite complicated and a simple response may in fact make matters worse. For example, when an earthquake strikes a modern building, more people are generally killed indirectly by a subsequent fire or flood than directly by falling debris; a device that shuts off water to prevent flooding caused by ruptured pipes might defeat critical fire safety systems. On the other hand, if a particular site is not threatened by fire or explosion, a device that automatically shuts off a gas line in response to an earthquake will leave site users without heat until properly certified emergency personnel can re-establish the gas connection—likely a low priority during a crisis. Similarly, if a particular site is not threatened by fire or explosion, a breached water pipe that is left uncontrolled may cause flooding; the flood water may increase the chance of electric shock injuries in the area and may even cause portions of the structure to collapse under the increased load.
A number of solutions for shutting-off multiple utilities have been proposed. K. H. Kambouris and Orlando Jerez propose a “Universal Earthquake Safety Valve,” in U. S. Pat. No. 5,489,889, granted on Feb. 6, 1996. Alan Y. Flig and Paul Regan propose an “Earthquake Utilities Cut-Off Control System” in U.S. Pat. No. 4,841,287, granted on Jun. 20, 1989. Roderick D. Hogan proposes an “Earthquake Fire Safety System” in U.S. Pat. No. 4,414,994, granted on Nov. 15, 1983. All three solutions are directed to cutting-off multiple utilities to a site in response to a single complex disaster event—for example an earthquake.
The above three proposed solutions arguably protect a site by neutralizing the utility inputs and thereby simplifying the disaster environment so that the utilities cannot exacerbate the disaster. However, such a strategy is regrettably too simple because automatic utility reconnection is not considered.
Automatic utility reconnection might be advantageous in a number of situations. For example, if a particular utility is not a threat to a site, then it might be an important resource in combating the disaster event: water for fire fighting; electricity for lighting; gas for heat.
Also to be considered is that manual utility reconnection is a painstaking process. For a complex site such as an office tower or a condominium complex, manual reconnection can take days. A skilled person must inspect the utility conduit for breaches or other faults. Most often, the person visually examines the conduit and listens for leaks. He may also have to bring test equipment to the site. In contrast, automatic reconnection employing appropriately arranged installed sensors might be better suited to this task.
Some incredibly complicated solutions have also been proposed for protecting a site in the event of a disaster. Paul E. Barbeau proposes a “Fire Crisis Management System” in Canadian patent application No. 2,065,786, filed on Apr. 10, 1992 and claiming priority from U.S. patent application Ser. No. 07/860,888, filed on Mar. 31, 1992. Barbeau suggests that the protected site be modeled so that an expert system can direct appropriate equipment to combat a fire in real time. Unfortunately, this sort of endeavor requires significant modeling effort and computer power and may therefore not be widely practical. It will be noted that Barbeau restricts his teaching to fire disasters and even then is only able to specify a list of general factors to be considered in programming the expert system.
What is needed is an practical system that will in response to a complex disaster stimulus temporarily place all site utility interconnections into a safe state—preferably a shut-off state—in order to stabilize the site, and then proceed to intelligently and safely reconnect the utilities to the site in order to reestablish normalcy.
The present invention is directed to such a system.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
According to one aspect of the invention there is provided a system for affecting the interaction of a set of utilities within the environment of a site, each member of the set of utilities being created externally from the site and being conducted into the site through an input port having at least one access state wherein the input port facilitates access to the site and at least one restriction state wherein the input port restricts access to the site and being conducted out of the site through an output port having at least one egress state wherein the output port facilitates egress from the site and at least one restriction state wherein the output port restricts egress from the site, the system comprising: means for generating a first fault signal in response to a condition that threatens to degrade the environment of the site, and means for ensuring that the input port for each member of the set of utilities is in a predetermined access state or restriction state in response to the first fault signal.
The ensuring means might ensure that the input port for each member of the set of utilities is in a predetermined restriction state in response to the first fault signal. The system might further include an auxiliary source within the site for providing the site with a first member of the set of utilities when the input port for the first member is in a restriction state. The system might further include means for ensuring that the output port for each member of the set of utilities is in a predetermined egress state or restriction state in response to the first fault signal.
The system might further include means for generating a second fault signal in response to a condition that threatens to degrade the environment of the site, and means for changing the port for a second member of the set of utilities from a restriction state to an access state in response to the second fault signal.
Alternatively, the means for generating the first fault signal might include: means for detecting whether each member of the set of utilities, as measured at its input port, is faulty, means for detecting whether each member of the set of utilities, as measured at its output port, is faulty, and means for detecting whether each member of the set of utilities, as measured within the site, is faulty.
In such a system, a member of the set of utilities might be faulty if it exists in the wrong quantity, it is of a wrong quality, or it exists in the wrong quantity or if it is of a wrong quality.
The system might further include means for receiving at predetermined intervals: the results of the input port detection means, the results of the output port detection means, and the results of the within-site detection means, whereby a measurement dataset is formed from the detection results for each member of the set of utilities and the time the results were received. The system might further includ
Christensen O'Connor Johnson & Kindness PLLC
Gain, Jr. Edward F.
Grant William
LandOfFree
System for reducing disaster damage does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with System for reducing disaster damage, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and System for reducing disaster damage will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2518553