Data processing: financial – business practice – management – or co – Automated electrical financial or business practice or...
Reexamination Certificate
1998-03-20
2001-04-24
Trammell, James P. (Department: 2162)
Data processing: financial, business practice, management, or co
Automated electrical financial or business practice or...
C705S014270, C705S016000, C705S014270, C705S023000, C705S026640, C902S022000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06223163
ABSTRACT:
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to point-of-sale terminals, and, more specifically, to methods and apparatus for controlling offers that are provided at point-of-sale terminals.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Point-of-sale (“POS”) terminals, such as cash registers, are used in a wide variety of businesses for performing such processes as calculating the total price of a purchase (goods or services) and calculating the amount of change due to a customer. In addition, POS terminals may also be used with an offering system in order to provide offers to customers. Such offering systems may be intended to increase sales, and thereby increase the average profit gained per transaction.
One type of offering system is described in the parent application of the present application, patent application Ser. No. 08/920,116, entitled METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR PROCESSING SUPPLEMENTARY PRODUCT SALES AT A POINT-OF-SALE TERMINAL, filed on Aug. 26, 1997. As described therein, a customer at a POS terminal is offered an “upsell” in exchange for an amount of change he is due. The POS terminal determines an upsell in dependence on a purchase of the customer, and also determines an upsell price (the amount of change due) based on the purchase. For example, a customer purchasing a first product for $1.74 and tendering $2.00 may be offered a second product in lieu of the $0.26 change due. The upsell price, $0.26, thus depends on the purchase price $1.74. Another type of offering system is a computer-determined “suggestive sell”. U.S. Pat. No. 5,353,219 describes a system for suggesting items for a customer to purchase at conventional item prices.
In an offering system, there are many possible offers which may be provided to customers. For example, in the above-described upsell offer, many different upsells may be offered to a customer in exchange for the particular amount of change due. An offer to a customer at a fast-food restaurant may include a soda, large French fries, or a dessert. Precisely which upsell to offer may be chosen according to a predetermined program at random, or manually by a manager or other operator.
Unfortunately, random or manual selection of an offer does not necessarily assure that the “best” (highest performing) offers will be provided to customers. What constitutes the “best” offer may be evaluated with respect to one or more criteria, yielding corresponding “performance rates” for the various offers. For example, the acceptance rate of an offer is a performance rate that may be used to evaluate the offer, since some offers may be less likely to be accepted by customers than other offers. In addition, the profit derived from an accepted offer is another performance rate that may be used to evaluate the offer.
It may be difficult or impossible for a manager or other operator to identify the “best” offers (the offers with the highest performance rates). A manager is unlikely to have knowledge of the true performance rates of a group of offers. A manager is also unlikely to have the time to analyze historical trends to identify the best offers. In addition, at different times of the day or days of the week, certain offers may be more attractive to customers than others. Unanticipated events, such as a high state lottery jackpot or a good article in a magazine, may also make certain offers more attractive. Such circumstances impede attempts by a manager to identify the best offers. Accordingly, a need exists for controlling offers that are provided at a point-of-sale terminal.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
It is an object of the present invention to control offers that are provided at a point-of-sale terminal.
In accordance with the present invention, a POS terminal or other computing device provides a plurality of offers to customers, and then measures a performance rate of each offer. For example, the acceptance rate or the profit rate of the offers may be measured. Based on the performance rates, a subset of offers is selected. In one embodiment, the highest performing offers are selected. In another embodiment, those offers having performance rates above a predetermined threshold are selected. The selected subset of offers is then provided, while the remaining, less desirable offers are discontinued.
REFERENCES:
patent: Re. 34915 (1995-04-01), Nichtberger et al.
patent: 3573747 (1971-04-01), Adams et al.
patent: 4108361 (1978-08-01), Krause
patent: 4323770 (1982-04-01), Dieulot et al.
patent: 4494197 (1985-01-01), Troy et al.
patent: 4500880 (1985-02-01), Gomersall et al.
patent: 4669730 (1987-06-01), Small
patent: 4677553 (1987-06-01), Roberts et al.
patent: 4689742 (1987-08-01), Troy et al.
patent: 4723212 (1988-02-01), Mindrum et al.
patent: 4760247 (1988-07-01), Keane et al.
patent: 4815741 (1989-03-01), Small
patent: 4825045 (1989-04-01), Humble
patent: 4839507 (1989-06-01), May
patent: 4854590 (1989-08-01), Jolliff et al.
patent: 4859838 (1989-08-01), Okiharu
patent: 4882473 (1989-11-01), Bergeron et al.
patent: 4908761 (1990-03-01), Tai
patent: 4910672 (1990-03-01), Off et al.
patent: 4922522 (1990-05-01), Scanlon
patent: 4937853 (1990-06-01), Brule et al.
patent: 4973952 (1990-11-01), Malec et al.
patent: 4982337 (1991-01-01), Burr et al.
patent: 4993714 (1991-02-01), Golightly
patent: 5056019 (1991-10-01), Schultz et al.
patent: 5119295 (1992-06-01), Kapur
patent: 5128862 (1992-07-01), Mueller
patent: 5132914 (1992-07-01), Cahlander et al.
patent: 5172328 (1992-12-01), Cahlander et al.
patent: 5173851 (1992-12-01), Off et al.
patent: 5177342 (1993-01-01), Adams
patent: 5192854 (1993-03-01), Counts
patent: 5201010 (1993-04-01), Deaton et al.
patent: 5216595 (1993-06-01), Protheroe
patent: 5223698 (1993-06-01), Kapur
patent: 5231569 (1993-07-01), Myatt et al.
patent: 5239165 (1993-08-01), Novak
patent: 5243515 (1993-09-01), Lee
patent: 5245533 (1993-09-01), Marshall
patent: 5262941 (1993-11-01), Saladin et al.
patent: 5274547 (1993-12-01), Zoffel et al.
patent: 5283731 (1994-02-01), Lalonde et al.
patent: 5287268 (1994-02-01), McCarthy
patent: 5297031 (1994-03-01), Gutterman et al.
patent: 5302811 (1994-04-01), Fukatsu
patent: 5309355 (1994-05-01), Lockwood
patent: 5353218 (1994-10-01), DeLapa et al.
patent: 5353219 (1994-10-01), Mueller et al.
patent: 5380991 (1995-01-01), Valencia et al.
patent: 5420606 (1995-05-01), Begum et al.
patent: 5459306 (1995-10-01), Stein et al.
patent: 5481094 (1996-01-01), Suda
patent: 5504475 (1996-04-01), Houdou et al.
patent: 5510979 (1996-04-01), Moderi et al.
patent: 5572653 (1996-11-01), DeTemple et al.
patent: 5581064 (1996-12-01), Riley et al.
patent: 5592375 (1997-01-01), Salmon et al.
patent: 5592376 (1997-01-01), Hodroff
patent: 5602377 (1997-02-01), Beller et al.
patent: 5611052 (1997-03-01), Dykstra et al.
patent: 5612868 (1997-03-01), Off et al.
patent: 5615269 (1997-03-01), Micali
patent: 5620079 (1997-04-01), Molbak
patent: 5621201 (1997-04-01), Langhans et al.
patent: 5621640 (1997-04-01), Burke
patent: 5632010 (1997-05-01), Briechle et al.
patent: 5664115 (1997-09-01), Fraser
patent: 5665953 (1997-09-01), Mazzamuto et al.
patent: 5717866 (1998-02-01), Naftzger
patent: 5724886 (1998-03-01), Ewald et al.
patent: 5822735 (1998-10-01), De Lapa et al.
patent: 6055513 (2000-04-01), Katz et al.
patent: 6064987 (2000-05-01), Wallier et al.
patent: 6085164 (2000-07-01), Smith et al.
patent: 512413 (1992-11-01), None
patent: 780788 (1997-06-01), None
patent: 5242363 (1993-09-01), None
patent: WO 9735441 (1997-09-01), None
patent: WO 97/46961 (1997-12-01), None
patent: WO 97/50064 (1997-12-01), None
Kennedy Doug, Train front desk staff in sales, pp. 1-2, Mar. 1997.*
Debby Garbato, Cook's Warehouse offers, pp. 1-2, Aug. 1994.*
Rodwin Marc A, Consumer protection and managed care, pp. 1-7, Sep. 1996.*
Goodstein Ronald C, UPC Scanner pricingsystems pp. 1-6, Mar. 1997.*
“Cape Town”, Reuters, Nov. 8, 1979, Thursday PM Cylce.
“Save The Mark”, Financial Times (London), Feb. 1, 1983, Section I: Men & Matters at p. 12.
Greene, Jan, “Farm bills please assns; National Grocers Association”, Supermarket News, Dec. 23, 1985, vo
Alderucci Dean P.
Tesfamariam Mussie
Trammell James P.
Walker Digital, LLC
LandOfFree
Method and apparatus for controlling offers that are... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Method and apparatus for controlling offers that are..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Method and apparatus for controlling offers that are... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2517445