Interference free biosensor

Electrolysis: processes – compositions used therein – and methods – Electrolytic analysis or testing – Of biological material

Reexamination Certificate

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

C204S403060, 26, 26, 26, 26, C435S817000

Reexamination Certificate

active

06261440

ABSTRACT:

FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The present disclosure is in the field of biosensors for the analysis of body fluids.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
One method for measuring the concentration of glucose in blood is to cause a reaction between the glucose and the enzyme glucose oxidase. The reaction produces hydrogen peroxide, which can be electrochemically oxidized at positive potentials. The current produced by the oxidation of peroxide is measured and is proportional to the glucose concentration in the blood. A similar scheme may be used to measure other analytes of interest by selecting the appropriate enzyme that will produce hydrogen peroxide in proportion to the concentration of the analyte, e.g., lactate may be similarly measured using the enzyme lactate oxidase.
A long standing problem with these measurement techniques is that of interference from other substances. Blood may contain other components which can oxidize at the same potential as hydrogen peroxide; prevalent among these are urate and acetaminophen. As these or other interfering substances oxidize, the current resulting from their oxidation is added to and indistinguishable from the current resulting from the oxidation of the hydrogen peroxide. An error therefore results in the quantification of the peroxide and consequently the blood analyte.
Many methods have been tried to reduce or eliminate these interferences. Acetaminophen has been particularly difficult to eliminate because, unlike urate, acetaminophen is not charged. One methodology disclosed in the art (see, e.g., Sittampalam, G., and Wilson, G. S., Analytical Chemistry, 55:1608-1610, 1983, and Geise, R. J., et al, Biosensors and Bioelectronics, 6:151-160, 1991) has been to use one or more selectively permeable membranes to prevent the interfering substances from contacting the electrode, although this method is not effective at fully preventing interference.
An alternate method for preventing interference is disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,225,064 and 5,334,296. This method decreases the electrical potential of the reaction to a state where urate and acetaminophen are not oxidized. This may be accomplished by employing an enzyme that will reduce hydrogen peroxide, such as a form of peroxidase, in the electrode. In this type of system, the hydrogen peroxide reacts with the peroxidase, in which reaction the hydrogen peroxide is reduced and the peroxidase oxidizes. If the peroxidase is in intimate contact with an electrode's surface, the peroxidase can be reduced at the electrode by imposing an electrical potential. The magnitude of the current required to reduce the peroxidase is proportional to the concentration of the hydrogen peroxide and hence proportional to the concentration of glucose or other analyte of interest. Moreover, the reactions occur at potentials at which urate and acetaminophen do not oxidize and therefore do not interfere.
The art recognizes the use of horseradish peroxidase or fungal peroxidase physically adsorbed to a gold or carbon surface in attempts to prevent interference (see, e.g., U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,225,064 and 5,334,296; Ho, W. O., et al, J. Electroanal. Chem., 351:187-197, 1993; Wollenberger, U., et al, Bioelectrochemistry and Bioenergetics, 26:287-296, 1991; Csoregi, E., et al, Anal. Chem. 66:3604-3610, 1994). However these reports indicate that such use has yielded unsatisfactory results as the magnitude of the electric currents forming the signals in these applications are quite small and the linearity is poor at high peroxide concentrations.
There is great utility, therefore, in the development of an electrode system in which hydrogen peroxide reacts in a measurable way, generating signal currents of usable magnitudes and that are linear to high concentrations, yet which are not subject to interference caused by the oxidation of interfering substances such as urate and acetaminophen.


REFERENCES:
patent: 5173165 (1992-12-01), Schmid et al.
patent: 5202261 (1993-04-01), Musho et al.
patent: 5225064 (1993-07-01), Henkens et al.
patent: 5273896 (1993-12-01), Pedersen et al.
patent: 5700770 (1997-12-01), Damhus et al.
patent: 5755953 (1998-05-01), Henning et al.
patent: 0078990 (1983-05-01), None
patent: 2276724 (1994-10-01), None
patent: 9323748 (1993-11-01), None
patent: 9606947 (1996-03-01), None
patent: 9722715 (1997-06-01), None
Wang et al. (“Metal-Dispersed Carbon Paste Electrodes”, Anal. Chem. month unknown 1992, 64, 1285-188).*
Johansson et al. (“A reagentless amperometric biosensr for alcohol detection in column liquid chromatography based on co-immobilized peroxidase and alcohol oxidase in carbon paste”, Journal of Biotechnology, 31 (month unknown 1993) 301-316).*
Kacaniklic et al. (“Amperometric Biosensors for Detection of L-and D-Amino Acids Based on Coimmobilized Peroxidase and L- and D-Amino Acid Oxidases in Carbon Paste Electrodes”, Electroanalysis, 6(month unknown 1994) 391-390).*
E. Csöregi, et al., “Carbon fibres as electrode materials for the construction of peroxidase-modified amperometric biosensors.”, Analytica Chimica Acta, vol. 273, No. 1-2, 1993, pp. 59-70.
G. Jönsson-Pettersson, “Reagentless hydrogen peroxide and glucose sensors based on peroxidase immobilized on graphite electrodes.”, Electroanalysis, vol. 3, No. 8, Oct. 1991, pp. 741-750.
Marko-Varga, et al., Enzyme-based biosensor as a selective detection unit in column liquid chromatography, Journal of Chromatography A, 660 (1994) pp 153-167 month unknown.
Cardosi, Hydrogen Peroxide-Sensitive Electrode Based on Horseradish Perioxidase-Modified Platinized Carbon, Electroanalysis 6 (1994) pp 89-96 month unknown.
Cardosi, et al.,Screen printed glucose electrodes based on platinised carbon particles and glucose oxidase, Analytica Chimica Acta, 276 (1993) pp 69-74 month unknown.
Cardosi et al. (“Screen printed glucose electrodes based on platinized carbon particles and glucose oxidase”, Analytica chimica Acta, 276(month unknown 1993) 69-74).*
Marko-Varga et al. (“Enzyme-based biosensor as a selective dection unit in column liquid chromatography”, J. Chromatography A, 660 (month unknown 1994) 153-167).*
Cardosi et al. (“Hydrogen peroxide-sensitive electrode based on Horseradish peroxidase-modified platinized carbon”, electroanalysis, 6 (month unknown 1994) 89-96).

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Interference free biosensor does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Interference free biosensor, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Interference free biosensor will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2440779

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.