Surgery – Means for introducing or removing material from body for... – Treating material introduced into or removed from body...
Patent
1995-06-02
1997-12-16
Mendez, Manuel
Surgery
Means for introducing or removing material from body for...
Treating material introduced into or removed from body...
606 34, A61M 3700
Patent
active
056979096
DESCRIPTION:
BRIEF SUMMARY
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates generally to the field of electrosurgery and, more particularly, to surgical devices and methods which employ very high frequency electrodes comprising an array of individual, isolated electrode terminals.
The field of electrosurgery includes a number of loosely related surgical techniques which have in common the application of electrical energy to modify the structure or integrity of patient tissue. Electrosurgical procedures usually operate through the application of very high frequency currents to cut or ablate tissue structures, where the operation can be monopolar or bipolar. Monopolar techniques rely on external grounding of the patient, where the surgical device defines only a single electrode pole. Bipolar devices comprise both electrodes for the application of current between their surfaces.
Electrosurgical procedures and techniques are particularly advantageous since they generally reduce patient bleeding and trauma associated with cutting operations. Additionally, electrosurgical ablation procedures, where tissue surfaces and volume may be reshaped, cannot be duplicated through other treatment modalities.
The use of electrosurgical procedures in electrically conductive environments, however, can be problematic. For example, many arthroscopic procedures require flushing of the region to be treated with isotonic saline (also referred to as normal saline), both to maintain an isotonic environment and to keep the field of viewing clear. The presence of saline, which is a highly conductive electrolyte, can cause shorting of the electrosurgical electrode in both monopolar and bipolar modes. Such shorting causes unnecessary heating in the treatment environment and can further cause non-specific tissue destruction.
Present electrosurgical techniques used for tissue ablation also suffer from an inability to control the depth of necrosis in the tissue being treated. Most electrosurgical devices rely on creation of an electric arc between the treating electrode and the tissue being cut or ablated to cause the desired localized heating. Such arcs, however, often create very high temperatures causing a depth of necrosis greater than 500 .mu.m, frequently greater than 800 .mu.m, and sometimes as great as 1700 .mu.m. The inability to control such depth of necrosis is a significant disadvantage in using electrosurgical techniques for tissue ablation, particularly in arthroscopic procedures for ablating and/or reshaping fibrocartilage, articular cartilage, meniscal tissue, and the like.
In an effort to overcome at least some of these limitations of electrosurgery, laser apparatus have been developed for use in arthroscopic and other procedures. Lasers do not suffer from electrical shorting in conductive environments, and certain types of lasers allow for very controlled cutting with limited depth of necrosis. Despite these advantages, laser devices suffer from their own set of deficiencies. In the first place, laser equipment can be very expensive because of the costs associated with the laser light sources. Moreover, those lasers which permit acceptable depths of necrosis (such as excimer lasers, erbium:YAG lasers, and the like) provide a very low volumetric ablation rate, which is a particular disadvantage in cutting and ablation of fibrocartilage, articular cartilage, and meniscal tissue. The holmium:YAG and Nd:YAG lasers provide much higher volumetric ablation rates, but are much less able to control depth of necrosis than are the slower laser devices. The CO.sub.2 lasers provide high rate of ablation and low depth of tissue necrosis, but cannot operate in a liquid-filled cavity.
For these reasons, it would be desirable to provide improved apparatus and methods for efficiently cutting and ablating tissue, particularly fibrocartilage, articular cartilage, meniscal tissue, and the like in arthroscopic and other procedures. Such apparatus and methods should be able to selectively cut and ablate tissue and other body structures
REFERENCES:
patent: 2050904 (1936-08-01), Trice
patent: 4033351 (1977-07-01), Hetzel
patent: 4043342 (1977-08-01), Morrison, Jr.
patent: 4202337 (1980-05-01), Hren et al.
patent: 4228800 (1980-10-01), Degler, Jr. et al.
patent: 4240441 (1980-12-01), Khalil
patent: 4326529 (1982-04-01), Doss
patent: 4381007 (1983-04-01), Doss
patent: 4476862 (1984-10-01), Pao
patent: 4532924 (1985-08-01), Auth et al.
patent: 4567890 (1986-02-01), Ohta et al.
patent: 4593691 (1986-06-01), Lindstrom et al.
patent: 4658817 (1987-04-01), Hardy
patent: 4674499 (1987-06-01), Pao
patent: 4709698 (1987-12-01), Johnston et al.
patent: 4736743 (1988-04-01), Daikuzono
patent: 4737678 (1988-04-01), Hasegawa
patent: 4762128 (1988-08-01), Rosenbluth
patent: 4765331 (1988-08-01), Petruzzi et al.
patent: 4785806 (1988-11-01), Deckelbaum
patent: 4813429 (1989-03-01), Eshel et al.
patent: 4931047 (1990-06-01), Broadwin et al.
patent: 4936301 (1990-06-01), Rexroth et al.
patent: 4943290 (1990-07-01), Rexroth et al.
patent: 4955377 (1990-09-01), Lennox et al.
patent: 4967765 (1990-11-01), Turner et al.
patent: 4968314 (1990-11-01), Michaels
patent: 4976711 (1990-12-01), Parins et al.
patent: 4979948 (1990-12-01), Geddes et al.
patent: 4998933 (1991-03-01), Eggers et al.
patent: 5007437 (1991-04-01), Sterzer
patent: 5009656 (1991-04-01), Reimels
patent: 5037421 (1991-08-01), Boutacoff et al.
patent: 5057105 (1991-10-01), Malone et al.
patent: 5061266 (1991-10-01), Hakky
patent: 5078717 (1992-01-01), Parins et al.
patent: 5080660 (1992-01-01), Buelna
patent: 5083565 (1992-01-01), Parins
patent: 5102410 (1992-04-01), Dressel
patent: 5108391 (1992-04-01), Flachenecker et al.
patent: 5112330 (1992-05-01), Nishigaki et al.
patent: 5125928 (1992-06-01), Parins et al.
patent: 5147354 (1992-09-01), Boutacoff et al.
patent: 5151098 (1992-09-01), Loertscher
patent: 5178620 (1993-01-01), Eggers et al.
patent: 5195959 (1993-03-01), Smith
patent: 5217455 (1993-06-01), Tan
patent: 5249585 (1993-10-01), Turner et al.
patent: 5261410 (1993-11-01), Alfano et al.
patent: 5267997 (1993-12-01), Farin et al.
patent: 5277201 (1994-01-01), Stern
patent: 5281216 (1994-01-01), Klicek
patent: 5281218 (1994-01-01), Imran
patent: 5282797 (1994-02-01), Chess
patent: 5290273 (1994-03-01), Tan
patent: 5290282 (1994-03-01), Casscells
patent: 5300099 (1994-04-01), Rudie
patent: 5301687 (1994-04-01), Wong et al.
patent: 5304170 (1994-04-01), Green
patent: 5312395 (1994-05-01), Tan et al.
patent: 5322507 (1994-06-01), Costello et al.
patent: 5326343 (1994-07-01), Rudie et al.
patent: 5330518 (1994-07-01), Neilson et al.
patent: 5336217 (1994-08-01), Buys et al.
patent: 5366443 (1994-11-01), Eggers et al.
patent: 5370642 (1994-12-01), Keller
patent: 5370675 (1994-12-01), Edwards et al.
patent: 5380316 (1995-01-01), Aita et al.
patent: 5383917 (1995-01-01), Desai et al.
patent: 5389096 (1995-02-01), Aita et al.
patent: 5419767 (1995-05-01), Eggers et al.
patent: 5423803 (1995-06-01), Tankovich
patent: 5445634 (1995-08-01), Keller
patent: 5454809 (1995-10-01), Janssen
patent: 5569242 (1996-10-01), Lax et al.
Rand, J. A. et al. "Effect of Electrocautery on Fresh Human Articular Cartilage," (1985) Arthroscopy, The Journal of Arthrocopic and Related Surgery, pp. 242-246.
Buchelt, M. et al. "Excimer Laser Ablation of Fibrocartilage: An In Vitro and In Vivo Study," (1991) Lasers in Surgery and Medicine 11:271-279.
Costello, A. J. et al. "Nd:YAG Laser Ablation of the Prostate as a Treatment of Benign Prostatic Hypertrophy," (1992) Lasers in Surger and Medicine 12:121-124.
P. C. Nardella (1989) SPIE 1068:42-49 Radio Frequency Energy and Impedance Feedback.
Rand et al. (1985) J. Arthro. Surg. 1:242-246 Effect of Electrocautery on Fresh Human Articular Cartilage.
Eggers Philip E.
Thapliyal Hira V.
ArthroCare Corporation
Mendez Manuel
LandOfFree
Methods and apparatus for surgical cutting does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Methods and apparatus for surgical cutting, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Methods and apparatus for surgical cutting will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-201474