Miscellaneous active electrical nonlinear devices – circuits – and – Signal converting – shaping – or generating – Current driver
Reexamination Certificate
1996-03-22
2002-06-18
Tran, Toan (Department: 2816)
Miscellaneous active electrical nonlinear devices, circuits, and
Signal converting, shaping, or generating
Current driver
C327S377000, C327S544000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06407594
ABSTRACT:
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION
This application claims priority from European App'n 93830159.5, filed Apr. 9, 1993, which is hereby incorporated by reference.
BACKGROUND AND SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to output power stages employing a power switch for connecting to a ground node a load and wherein static power consumption within the driving circuit is substantially eliminated.
A circuit for switchingly connecting to ground (low-side driver) an external load employing a power switch has a basic diagram as shown in FIG.
1
.
Commonly the power switch Pw is a transistor, and often an integrated DMOS transistor (which offers definite advantages over a bipolar junction transistor). The integrated transistor structure intrinsically contains a junction (diode) Dr through which, in case of reactive loads, transient currents may recirculate. The power transistor Pw constitutes the output stage and is controlled by a driving circuit which determines a state of conduction or of nonconduction of the transistor, according to a certain “duty cycle” (in most applications).
In this way, an output signal having an amplitude comprised between V
1
=Rdson*Id and Vh=H.V. is produced, where H.V. is the supply voltage to which the external load is connected, Rdson is the saturation resistance of the power transistor Pw, and Id is the current through the load.
In order to ensure a low voltage drop through the power transistor Pw when it is conducting, and therefore a low power dissipation, it is highly desirable to minimize the Rdson value. This is achieved by driving the power transistor with a (gate) voltage that is higher than the voltage that is necessary for switching-on the transistor. Normally, for a DMOS transistor such an overdrive voltage may reach about 10V, i.e. Vgs=10V, that may be equal to the supply voltage Vcc of the control circuit.
Moreover, the output signal (OUT) is often required to have certain slew-rate characteristics (T
f
and T
r
) and delays (T
PHL
and T
PLH
), as referred to the control signal (IN), controlled and equal to each other, as depicted in FIG.
2
.
On the other hand, in order to switch-on the power transistor Pw, it is necessary to charge the capacitance of the driving node (gate node) up to a voltage that is higher than the threshold voltage Vth of the transistor. If, during a switch-on phase, driving is effected through a constant current generator I
1
driven by the switching signal IN (FIG.
1
), the gate voltage will have a diagram versus time as the one depicted in FIG.
3
. Three different zones of operation of the power transistor may be distinguished, as determined by the actual input capacitance that varies from zone to zone.
In a first zone I of the characteristic, the gate voltage rises from Vgs=0V to Vgs=Vth. In this interval of time no current flows through the power transistor which remains in an off condition. The interval t
0
-t
1
is defined as turn-on delay time T
PHL
. After the instant t
1
, the power transistor starts to conduct and the voltage Vds across the power transistor drops from Vh to Vdson=V
1
.
In a zone II of the characteristic, normally referred to as the saturation zone, the ratio &Dgr;Vds/&Dgr;Vgs is high and therefore the Miller effect becomes preponderant in determining the input capacitance as compared with the “physical” gate capacitance of the power transistor. Because of this, the driving current primarily charges the “Miller” capacitance while a negligible portion of it charges the Cgs capacitance between gate and source of the power transistor Pw, thus causing a negligible variation of the Vgs voltage. In fact, the gate voltage rises from the value Vgs=Vth to the value Vgs=Vs (Vs is also referred to as the operative voltage). The interval t
1
-t
2
is defined as the fall time T
f
.
In the zone III of operation, the gate capacitance charges completely to the voltage Vcc and the power transistor is fully on (low internal resistance).
Similarly, for switching-off the power transistor Pw, its gate capacitance is discharged through a constant current generator I
2
, which is functionally connected between the gate node of thee power transistor and ground and which is driven by a switching signal IN, in opposite phase with respect to the switch signal IN driving I
1
. During a “time off” phase phenomena similar to those that occur during the “turn-on” phase takes place, as depicted in FIG.
4
. Also in this phase of operation in fact, the gate capacitance discharges through three distinct phases.
In a first phase or zone I of the characteristic, the gate voltage drops from the value Vgs=Vcc to the operative voltage Vgs=Vs, while the drain voltage remains at Vdson. This interval (t′
0
-t′
1
) is defined as the turn-off delay time T
PLH
.
In a second region II of the characteristic, the voltage Vgs drops from Vs to the threshold voltage Vth and during this phase the power transistor Pw starts to carry less and less current until it switches-off completely. The duration of this interval (t′
1
-t′
2
) during which the drain voltage rises from V
1
to Vh, is defined as the rise time T
r
.
If the currents I
1
and I
2
have the same value, the rise time and the fall time are identical.
In order to have a large charge current (Ic) and a large discharge current (Is) of the gate capacitance of the power transistor Pw for achieving fast switching times, while employing control current generators I
1
and I
2
of relatively low value, a driving circuit as the one depicted in
FIG. 5
is employed. In fact, the relationship that ties the currents Ic and Is to the currents ID
1
and ID
4
is of an exponential kind:
Ic=n*I
D
1 exp
R*I
D1
/Vt
Is=n*I
D
4 exp
R*I
D4
/Vt
If I
D
1
and I
D
4
are equal, the currents Ic and Is will be equal and so also the fall time and the rise time.
In practice, in a circuit as the one depicted in
FIG. 5
, the current I
D
4
is different from I
D
1
. In fact, the MOS M
1
and M
2
operate with a constant Vgs, therefore the current I
D
1
=I, while the MOS M
3
and M
4
operates with a Vgs that varies because their source is not connected to a fixed voltage, but to the gate of the power transistor Pw, the voltage of which drops during a turn-off phase. Therefore, I
D
4
≠I.
Commonly, in order to obviate to this drawback, the sources of M
3
and M
4
are connected to a fixed voltage, for example to the supply voltage Vcc, so that, the current mirror formed by M
3
-M
4
, generates the same current as the current mirror M
1
-M
2
. Such a known solution is depicted in
FIG. 6
, and a functional block diagram may be depicted as in FIG.
7
.
In this circuit, the transistors M
2
and M
4
do not exactly operate under the same conditions. In fact, M
4
operates always in a saturation zone, with Vgs
1
=constant and Vds
1
=constant=Vcc−2Vbe, and the transistor M
2
operates in a saturation zone until Vds
2
=Vgs2-Vth and thereafter operates in a linear zone. When M
2
operates in a linear zone, the gate voltage of the power transistor Pw has already risen, above the operative voltage Vs, therefore the transistor no longer operates in the zone II and therefore the drain of the transistor has already assumed the voltage Vh.
This circuit has a drawback represented by the fact that when the power transistor Pw is off, and therefore its gate voltage is Vgs=0V, a certain current consumption (drawn from the supply line Vcc) occurs and is given by the sum: I
2
+I
D4
.
In integrated circuits where numerous driving stages of this type are present, such a static current consumption may reach intolerable levels.
A main objective of the invention is to provide an improved control circuit for a low-side driver stage that without penalizing speed and precision characteristics has a substantially null static current consumption.
This objective is reached with the driver circuit of the present invention, which is characterized by the
Alzati Angelo
Bontempo Gregorio
Milazzo Patrizia
Allen Dyer Doppelt Milbrath & Gilchrist, P.A.
Englund Terry L.
Jorgenson Lisa K.
SGS--Thomson Microelectronics S.r.l.
Tran Toan
LandOfFree
Zero bias current driver control circuit does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Zero bias current driver control circuit, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Zero bias current driver control circuit will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2957665