X-ray or gamma ray systems or devices – Specific application – Diffraction – reflection – or scattering analysis
Reexamination Certificate
2001-12-13
2004-05-04
Glick, Edward J. (Department: 2882)
X-ray or gamma ray systems or devices
Specific application
Diffraction, reflection, or scattering analysis
C378S079000, C378S084000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06731719
ABSTRACT:
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The invention relates to an X-ray diffractometer.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
X-ray diffractometers have been used for many years for analysing perfect, nearly perfect and highly imperfect materials on a routine basis.
An early high resolution diffractometer is the double-crystal diffractometer which is illustrated in FIG.
1
. An X-ray source
1
transmits X-rays to a collimating crystal
3
which directs them onto a sample
5
which can be rotated about an axis
7
. The X-rays are diffracted by the sample
5
onto a detector
9
. The sample is then rotated and the intensity of X-rays reaching the detector is measured as a function of the angle of this rotation. This structure is still widely used, and gives good results especially on perfect and near-perfect samples.
Unfortunately, double crystal diffractometers have a number of disadvantages. Firstly, the Bragg angle of the collimating crystal
3
has to match that of the sample
5
. The matching of the collimating crystal and the sample crystal is very important and the resolution is fixed by the crystals. Accordingly, a different collimating crystal
3
is required for each new sample material.
Secondly, the X-rays in a double crystal diffractometer reach a large and ill-defined region of the sample. Since this ill-defined region is the region analysed, X-ray diffractometers do not give good results for non crystalline materials or materials with defects.
Thirdly, in a double crystal diffractometer a number of different wavelengths are diffracted into the detector simultaneously. This reduces the precision and resolution of the results.
Fourthly, there is a large background level of illumination that reaches the detector from imperfect samples which makes analysis of any results a problem.
Furthermore, the double crystal diffractometer is very sensitive to the alignment and significant changes can be observed with a tilt angle varying by only 0.2°. This makes the double crystal diffractometer difficult to set up.
A number of proposals to alleviate some of these problems have been made.
Bartels describes a diffractometer which removes the inconvenience of having to change the crystal in “Characterization of Thin Layers on Perfect Crystals with a Multipurpose High Resolution X-ray Diffractometer”, Bartels, Journal Vacuum Science and Technology B Volume 1 page 338 (1983). Bartels replaced the collimating crystal of a double crystal diffractometer with two channel-cut monochromators which provide a good monochromator with a very narrow angular divergence. However, this change to the double-crystal diffractometer geometry does not solve many of the problems of the double-crystal diffractometer. In particular, the Bartels diffractometer cannot be used for interpreting complex diffraction patterns from all but the most perfect and flat samples.
Another prior art design is a triple-crystal diffractometer which overcomes the problem of a bent sample and produces a significantly improved diffraction profile. This is illustrated in FIG.
2
. The triple crystal diffractometer differs from the double crystal diffractometer by having a further analysing crystal
4
interposed between the sample
5
and the detector
9
. Each of the crystals is independently rotatable. The analyser acts as a detector with a very narrow angular acceptance.
Unfortunately, away from the position in which all three crystals have the same scattering angle the recorded intensity profile recorded at the detector broadens rapidly. Furthermore, alignment is very difficult and this configuration has accordingly only been used by a few research groups. Moreover, each new sample still requires a new collimating crystal.
The current state of the art commercial instrument is a multiple crystal diffractometer, in which the collimating crystal
3
of the triple crystal diffractometer is replaced by a multiple crystal collimating arrangement.
Commercial diffractometers may be used in particular for quality control. In practice it is the double crystal approach that has traditionally been used, and the very difficult alignment of the triple-axis diffractometer is normally avoided. Although the multiple crystal diffractometer is an excellent research instrument, it has not replaced the simpler double crystal diffractometer for production line control. In view of the disadvantages of the double crystal configuration mentioned above there is a need for an alternative X-ray diffractometer suitable for routine use that addresses these disadvantages.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
According to the invention there is provided an X-ray diffractometer, comprising
a sample stage for mounting a sample, the sample stage being rotatable about an axis,
a double pinhole collimator for directing X-ray radiation to a sample on the sample stage,
a detector for detecting X-rays diffracted by the sample, and
an analyser crystal arranged between the sample stage and the detector to direct X-rays diffracted by the sample onto the detector,
wherein the analyser crystal and detector are rotatable about an axis that is coaxial with the axis of rotation of the sample stage.
The new instrument reverses the crystals of a conventional double crystal arrangement and provides the second crystal after the sample rather than before. This gives greater precision in the measurement of the scattered beam direction which is most crucial for coping with imperfect materials. Moreover, the arrangement removes the need for precise wavelength control of the probing beam, which is why it is possible to replace the collimating crystal of a triple-axis arrangement with a double pinhole collimator.
As will be apparent from experimental results presented later, the diffractometer according to the inventor produces results approaching, possibly in some cases even surpassing, those obtained using a multiple crystal diffractometer. This is in spite of the fact that the diffractometer according to the invention is very much simpler to set up and to use.
The analysed region of the sample is much better defined and smaller in the diffractometer according to the invention than in a conventional double crystal diffractometer. This is because the sample is placed after the pinhole collimator. This produces a spot on a sample mounted on the sample stage with a well-defined central region (the umbra) and very little X-ray intensity in the penumbra (the region surrounding the umbra). To obtain a well defined and small region using a conventional double crystal diffractometer would require either a smaller spot area or alternatively complex focusing optics. These are not required in the diffractometer according to the invention.
A further difference over a conventional double crystal diffractometer is the narrow angular acceptance of the analyser, i.e. the analyser crystal can be nearly perfect and can direct into the detector X-rays only in a narrow angular range around the correct angle of incidence.
A significant advantage of the invention is that the combination of a well defined analysed region of the sample and the narrow angular acceptance of the analyser can greatly reduce the background and diffuse scattering that can easily make analysis a problem using a conventional double crystal diffractometer. Such scatter might frequently in prior art arrangements be X-rays diffracted from imperfect regions of the sample or from X-rays diffracted along paths not of interest to the analysis. Similarly the curvature of the sample will have a smaller influence on the breadth of the recorded intensity profile because of the narrow double pinhole collimator and analyser crystal.
In particular the combination of the well defined small analysed region and the narrow angular acceptance of the analyser crystal and detector greatly improves the performance with imperfect samples. In such imperfect sample small mosaic block sizes, defects, microscopic tilts and curvature can make it very difficult to analysis any data obtained with a conventional double crystal diffractometer. Whilst a triple axis diffractometer can signifi
Andrew Norman L.
Fewster Paul F.
Blakely & Sokoloff, Taylor & Zafman
Glick Edward J.
Ho Allen C.
PANalytical B.V.
LandOfFree
X-ray diffractometer does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with X-ray diffractometer, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and X-ray diffractometer will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3252236