Package making – Methods – Conforming by stretching or shrinking of cover over contents
Patent
1998-05-26
1999-12-28
Moon, Daniel B.
Package making
Methods
Conforming by stretching or shrinking of cover over contents
53556, 533894, B65B 5300
Patent
active
060064986
DESCRIPTION:
BRIEF SUMMARY
TECHNICAL FIELD
This invention relates to packaging processes in which an object to be packaged (which may be a single article or a plural assembly of articles) is wrapped in pre-stretched plastics film. More particularly, the invention relates to the mechanism used to stretch the film immediately before it is applied to the object. Such processes are frequently referred to as stretch wrapping processes and such mechanisms are frequently referred to as pre-stretching mechanisms.
BACKGROUND ART
Stretch wrapping utilises film having the property known as "memory", that is to say a tendency to recover its former shape or size, after having been strained beyond its elastic limit, some short while after the straining force has been relaxed.
Plastics wrapping film is normally provided to the user as a feed roll of unstretched film. Film is customarily drawn from the roll and applied to the object by securing an end of the film to the object, and then either rotating the object or orbiting the feed roll around the object. A number of types of pre-stretching mechanisms have been proposed hitherto whereby the web of film extending from the feed roll to the object is stretched as it is drawn from the roll before being applied to the object.
Such pre-stretching of the film is advantageous for a number of reasons, for example; lay-up tension, as the subsequent contraction of the film ensures a desirably tight wrap (this is particularly advantageous when an assemblage of relatively small or lightweight articles is to be wrapped, because it reduces the likelihood of the articles being displaced by the wrapping process), properties of the film, and effectively more wrapping material.
The simplest and least desirable prior known pre-stretching apparatus merely applies a brake to the roll of film. Such apparatus is disclosed, for example, in U.S. Pat. No. 3,867,806 (Lancaster) and U.S. Pat. No. 4,077,179 (Lancaster). In these and other instances wherein a brake is applied to the feed roll, the stretching is induced by using a high lay-up tension. This suffers from the disadvantages inherent in the use of a high lay-up tension indicated above. Furthermore, stretching occurs throughout the whole length of the flight of web extending from the feed roll to the object, so that the overall increase in length is large, and becomes unmanageable unless the rate of pre-stretch is limited to undesirably low values. Furthermore, stretching over a long length of film causes excessive contraction in the width direction of the film.
An improvement on simple brake devices is disclosed in Australian patent No. 536099 (Lancaster), wherein the web of film is trained around two rollers interposed between the feed roll and the object to be wrapped. Those rollers are connected by drive transmission means such that they necessarily rotate at different speeds or in different directions. This results in the stretching of the short length of web between the rollers.
Another prior art proposal is disclosed in Australian patent No. 589065 (Underhaug), wherein a braking roller in contact with the feed roll is connected to a stretching roller in contact with the drawn-off web by drive transmission means ensuring that the surface speed of the stretching roller is greater than that of the braking roller, so that a small and relatively constant length of web extending from the feed roll to the stretching roller is pre-stretched.
The braking and stretching rollers of the Underhaug device are mounted on a swinging lever whereby the web tension acting on the stretching roller is effective to load the braking roller against the feed roll. This ensures that braking contact between the braking roller and the feed roll is maintained as the feed roll diminishes in size. The lever introduces a mechanical advantage and ensures high pressure braking contact, indeed this is described as an advantage of the Underhaug device over its prior art.
In most respects the Underhaug device performs well when used in wrapping apparatus wherein the object to be wrapped rotat
REFERENCES:
patent: 3669370 (1972-06-01), Mason
patent: 3936007 (1976-02-01), Butz
patent: 4387552 (1983-06-01), Lancaster et al.
patent: 4418510 (1983-12-01), Lancaster, III et al.
patent: 4676048 (1987-06-01), Lancaster et al.
patent: 4829753 (1989-05-01), Briemont
patent: 4841716 (1989-06-01), Roymberg
patent: 5282347 (1994-02-01), Cleine et al.
patent: 5365723 (1994-11-01), Ramos
patent: 5408808 (1995-04-01), Masuda et al.
BHP Steel (JLA) Pty. Ltd.
K.C. Metal Products Pty. Ltd.
Moon Daniel B.
LandOfFree
Wrapping apparatus including a shuttle orbital movement around a does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Wrapping apparatus including a shuttle orbital movement around a, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Wrapping apparatus including a shuttle orbital movement around a will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2374470