Work comfort evaluating device and work comfort evaluating...

Surgery – Diagnostic testing – Detecting muscle electrical signal

Reexamination Certificate

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

C340S576000, C180S313000

Reexamination Certificate

active

07486987

ABSTRACT:
A work comfort evaluating device is a device for evaluating a level of comfort of work by measuring myoelectric potentials of plural muscles when the work is done by antagonistic activities of the muscles. The device has a pair of detecting sensors, an amplifier, a signal processing part, a work-load intensity calculating part, and an evaluation part. The sensors sense myoelectric potentials of the muscles at a time of the work. The signal processing part calculates a synchronous contraction intensity of the muscles by using myoelectric potential waveforms. The work-load intensity calculating part calculates a level of a work load intensity in the work. The evaluation part evaluates a level of comfort of the work by normalizing the synchronous contraction intensity by the level of the work load intensity calculated.

REFERENCES:
patent: 4667513 (1987-05-01), Konno
patent: 5740813 (1998-04-01), Ogata et al.
patent: 5964719 (1999-10-01), Costello et al.
patent: 6004312 (1999-12-01), Finneran et al.
patent: 6061610 (2000-05-01), Boer
patent: 6265978 (2001-07-01), Atlas
patent: 6974414 (2005-12-01), Victor
patent: 2004/0088205 (2004-05-01), Geisler et al.
patent: 2005/0015016 (2005-01-01), Elitok et al.
patent: 2002-214083 (2002-07-01), None
patent: 2002-225585 (2002-08-01), None
patent: 2002-230699 (2002-08-01), None
patent: 2002230699 (2002-08-01), None
patent: 2003 177079 (2003-06-01), None
patent: 2003-1777079 (2003-06-01), None
patent: 2004-049622 (2004-02-01), None
patent: 2004049622 (2004-02-01), None
English machine translation of JP 2004-049622. Obtained Sep. 18, 2008. Japan Patent Office. <http://www.jpo.go.jp>. pp. 1-12.
Jennifer A. Healey, “Wearable and Automotive Systems for Affect Recognition from Physiology”, Submitted to the Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, May 2000.
Helenice Gil Coury, Shrawan Kumar, and Yogesh Narayan, “An Electromyographic study of Upper Limb Adduction Force with Varying Shoulder and Elbow Postures”, Journal of Electromyography and Kineslology, vol. 8, pp. 157-168.
Lehman, G.J., et al., “The Importance of Normalization in the Interpretation of Surface Electromyography: A Proof of Principle,”J. Manip. Physiol. Therapeut. 22:444-46 (1999).
Tanaka, J. et al., “Workload of Using a Driver Assistance System,”IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Conference Proceedingspp. 382-386 (2000).
Yoshikawa, M. et al., “Measurement of Physical and Mental Reactions of Drivers During Driving,” 11thLecture on Measurement and Control Research in Shinshu Area, Collected Papers, Jun. 15, 1998.

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Work comfort evaluating device and work comfort evaluating... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Work comfort evaluating device and work comfort evaluating..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Work comfort evaluating device and work comfort evaluating... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-4101771

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.