Wells – Processes – Assembling well part
Reexamination Certificate
2007-05-29
2007-05-29
Neuder, William (Department: 3672)
Wells
Processes
Assembling well part
C166S278000, C166S051000
Reexamination Certificate
active
10431284
ABSTRACT:
A well system utilizes a control line system. The control line system is implemented with a completion of the type deployed in a wellbore. The control line system facilitates transmission of monitoring, command or other types of control and telemetry. It is emphasized that this abstract is provided to comply with the rules requiring an abstract which will allow a searcher or other reader to quickly ascertain the subject matter of the technical disclosure. It is submitted with the understanding that it will not be used to interpret or limit the scope or meaning of the claims. 37 CFR 1.72(b).
REFERENCES:
patent: 3864970 (1975-02-01), Bell
patent: 4375164 (1983-03-01), Dodge et al.
patent: 4783995 (1988-11-01), Michel et al.
patent: 4945991 (1990-08-01), Jones
patent: 4976142 (1990-12-01), Perales
patent: 5163321 (1992-11-01), Perales
patent: 5186255 (1993-02-01), Corey
patent: 5350018 (1994-09-01), Sorem et al.
patent: 5485745 (1996-01-01), Rademaker et al.
patent: 5515915 (1996-05-01), Jones et al.
patent: 5517593 (1996-05-01), Nenniger et al.
patent: 5579842 (1996-12-01), Riley
patent: 5690171 (1997-11-01), Winch et al.
patent: 5844927 (1998-12-01), Kringlebotn
patent: 5890533 (1999-04-01), Jones
patent: 5925879 (1999-07-01), Hay
patent: 5938925 (1999-08-01), Hamid et al.
patent: 6041860 (2000-03-01), Nazzal et al.
patent: 6065535 (2000-05-01), Ross
patent: 6065538 (2000-05-01), Reimers et al.
patent: 6125933 (2000-10-01), Ross
patent: 6173788 (2001-01-01), Lembcke et al.
patent: 6186229 (2001-02-01), Martin et al.
patent: 6192983 (2001-02-01), Neuroth et al.
patent: 6209640 (2001-04-01), Reimers et al.
patent: 6220353 (2001-04-01), Foster et al.
patent: 6253856 (2001-07-01), Ingram et al.
patent: 6279392 (2001-08-01), Shahin, Jr. et al.
patent: 6281489 (2001-08-01), Tubel et al.
patent: 6292066 (2001-09-01), Shibuya et al.
patent: 6296056 (2001-10-01), Ward
patent: 6302204 (2001-10-01), Reimers et al.
patent: 6325146 (2001-12-01), Ringgenberg et al.
patent: 6343651 (2002-02-01), Bixenman
patent: 6359569 (2002-03-01), Beck et al.
patent: 6446729 (2002-09-01), Bixenman et al.
patent: 6505682 (2003-01-01), Brockman
patent: 6513599 (2003-02-01), Bixenman et al.
patent: 2001/0020675 (2001-09-01), Tubel et al.
patent: 2002/0007948 (2002-01-01), Bayne et al.
patent: 2003/0196820 (2003-10-01), Patel
patent: 2005/0044690 (2005-03-01), Gillespie et al.
patent: 2355740 (2001-02-01), None
patent: WO 98/50673 (1998-11-01), None
patent: WO 98/50680 (1998-11-01), None
patent: WO99/45235 (1999-09-01), None
patent: WO 01/33032 (2001-05-01), None
patent: WO 01/65067 (2001-09-01), None
patent: WO01/92680 (2001-12-01), None
patent: WO02/06593 (2002-01-01), None
patent: WO02/06625 (2002-01-01), None
Hamid, Syed, Lester, G. Scott and Adkins, Darrell W.; A Fiber-Optic Inspection System for Prepacked Screens; Society of Petroleum Engineers Inc.; pp. 1-12.
Docket Sheet forMemry Corporationv.Kentucky Oil Technology, N.V., Case No. H-04-1959 (S.D. Tex.) (PACER Jun. 2, 2005) (5 pages).
Docket Sheet forMemry Corporationv.Kentucky Oil Technology, N.V., Case No. C-04-03843, (N.D. Cal.) (PACER Aug. 11, 2005) (13 pages).
Communication from United States District Court Transferring Case,Memry Corporationv.Kentucky Oil Technology, N.V., Case No. H-04-1959 (S.D. Tex.), dated Sep. 7, 2004 (1 page).
Plaintiffs' Original Complaint,Memry Corporationv.Kentucky Oil Technology, N.V., Case No. H-04-1959, (S.D. Tex.), filed May 14, 2004 (20 pages).
Defendants' Motions (1) to Dismiss the Complaint for Insufficiency of Process and Lack of Personal Jurisdiction, (2) to Dismiss Counts I-III of the Complaint for Failure to State a Claim, and (3) in the Alternative, to Transfer This Action to the Federal District Court for the Northern District of California,Memry Corporationv.Kentucky Oil Technology, N.V., Case No. H-04-1959, (S.D. Tex.), filed Jul. 7, 2004 (49 pages).
Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint,Memry Corporationv.Kentucky Oil Technology, N.V., Case No. C-04-03843, (N.D. Cal.), filed Aug. 19, 2004 (20 pages).
Answer of Defendants and Counterclaims of Kentucky Oil Technology N.V. Against Memry Corporation and Schlumberger Technology Corporation,Memry Corporationv.Kentucky Oil Technology, N.V., Case No. C-04-03843, (N.D. Cal.) filed Nov. 2, 2004 (20 pages).
Plaintiff and Counterdefendant Memry Corporation's Answer to Kentucky Oil Technology N.V.'s Counterclaims and Demand for Jury Trial,Memry Corporationv.Kentucky Oil Technology, N.V., Case No. C-04-03843, (N.D. Cal.), filed Dec. 3, 2004 (10 pages).
Schlumberger Technology Corporation's Notice of Motion and Motion to Dismiss Kentucky Oil Technology's Third, Fourth, Fifth, and Sixth Counterclaims; and Memorandum of Points and Authorities,Memry Corporationv.Kentucky Oil Technology, N.V., Case No. C-04-03843, (N.D. Cal.), filed Jan. 24, 2005 (32 pages).
[Proposed]Order Granting Schlumberger Technology Corporation's Motion to Dismiss Kentucky Oil Technology's Third, Fourth, Fifth, and Sixth Counterclaims,Memry Corporation, v.Kentucky Oil Technology, N.V., Case No. C-04-03843, (N.D. Cal.), filed Jan. 24, 2005 (3 pages).
First Amended Counterclaims of Kentucky Oil Technology N.V. Against Memry Corporation and Schlumberger Technology Corporation,Memry Corporationv.Kentucky Oil Technology, N.V., Case No. C-04-03843, (N.D. Cal.), filed Feb. 9, 2005 (16 pages).
Schlumberger Technology Corporation's Notice of Motion and Motion to Dismiss Kentucky Oil Technology's First Amended Third, Fourth, Fifth, and Sixth Counterclaims; and Memorandum of Points and Authorities,Memry Corporationv.Kentucky Oil Technology, N.V., Case No. C-04-03843, (N.D. Cal.), filed Feb. 24, 2005 (32 pages).
Request for Judicial Notice in Support of Schlumberger Technology Corporation's Motion to Dismiss Kentucky Oil Technology's First Amended Third, Fourth, Fifth, and Sixth Counterclaims,Memry Corporationv.Kentucky Oil Technology, N.V., Case No. C-04-03843, (N.D. Cal.), filed Feb. 24, 2005 (3 pages).
[Proposed] Order Granting Schlumberger Technology Corporation's Motion to Dismiss Kentucky Oil Technology's First Amended Third, Fourth, Fifth, and Sixth Counterclaims,Memry Corporationv.Kentucky Oil Technology, N.V., Case No. C-04-03843, (N.D. Cal.), filed Feb. 24, 2005 (3 pages).
Plaintiff and Counterdefendant Memry Corporation's Notice of Motion and Motion to Dismiss Kentucky Oil Technology's Third, Fourth, Fifth, and Sixth Counterclaims; and Memorandum of Points and Authorities,Memry Corporationv.Kentucky Oil Technology, N.V., Case No. C-04-03843, (N.D. Cal.), filed Feb. 25, 2005 (29 pages).
Request for Judicial Notice in Support of Memry Corporation's Motion to Dismiss Kentucky Oil Technology's Third, Fourth, Fifth, and Sixth Counterclaims,Memry Corporationv.Kentucky Oil Technology, N.V., Case No. C-04-03843, (N.D. Cal.), filed Feb. 25, 2005 (3 pages).
[Proposed] Order Granting Memry Corporation's Motion to Dismiss Kentucky Oil Technology's Third Fourth, Fifth, and Sixth Counterclaims,Memry Corporationv.Kentucky Oil Technology, N.V., Case No. C-04-03843, (N.D. Cal.), filed Feb. 25, 2005 (3 pages).
Opposition of Kentucky Oil to Motions of Memry Corporation and Schlumberger Technology Corporation to Dismiss First Amended Counterclaims,Memry Corporationv.Kentucky Oil Technology, N.V., Case No. C-04-03843, (N.D. Cal.), filed Mar. 11, 2005 (29 pages).
Kentucky Oil's Opposition to Counterdefendants' Requests for Judicial Notice in Support of Their Motions to Dismiss Kentucky Oil Technology's First Amended Third, Fourth, Fifth, and Sixth Counterclaims,Memry Corporationv.Kentucky Oil Technology, N.V., Case No. C-04-03843, (N.D. Cal.), filed Mar. 11, 2005 (3 pages).
Plaintiff and Counterdefendant Memry Corporation's Reply in Support of Motion to Dismiss Kentucky Oil Technology's Third, Fourth, Fifth, and Sixth Counterclaims,Memry Corporationv.Kentucky Oil Technology, N.V., Case No. C-04-03843, (N.D. Cal.), filed Mar. 18, 2005 (9 pages).
Plaintiff and Counterdefendant Memry Corporation's Reply in Support of Request for Judicial Notice,Memry Corporationv.Kentucky Oil Technology, N.V., Case No. C-04-03843, (N.D. Cal.),
Bixenman Patrick W.
Howard Peter V.
Patel Dinesh R.
Wetzel Rodney J.
Castano Jaime A.
McEnaney Kevin P.
Neuder William
Schlumberger Technology Corporation
Van Someren, P.C.
LandOfFree
Well communication system does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Well communication system, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Well communication system will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3802931