Wells – Processes – With indicating – testing – measuring or locating
Reexamination Certificate
2002-06-06
2004-07-27
Neuder, William (Department: 3672)
Wells
Processes
With indicating, testing, measuring or locating
C340S856200, C340S856300, C073S152460
Reexamination Certificate
active
06766854
ABSTRACT:
BACKGROUND OF INVENTION
1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates generally to the discovery and production of hydrocarbons, and more particularly, to the monitoring of downhole formation properties during drilling and production.
2. Background Art
Wells for the production of hydrocarbons such as oil and natural gas must be carefully monitored to prevent catastrophic mishaps that are not only potentially dangerous but also that have severe environmental impacts. In general, the control of the production of oil and gas wells includes many competing issues and interests including economic efficiency, recapture of investment, safety and environmental preservation.
On one hand, to drill and establish a working well at a drill site involves significant cost. Given that many “dry holes” are drilled, the wells that produce must pay for the exploration and digging costs for the dry holes and the producing wells. Accordingly, there is a strong desire to produce at a maximum rate to recoup investment costs.
On the other hand, the production of a producing well must be monitored and controlled to maximize the production over time. Production levels depend on reservoir formation characteristics such as pressure, porosity, permeability, temperature and physical layout of the reservoir and also the nature of the hydrocarbon (or other material) extracted from the formation. Additional characteristics of a producing formation must also be considered, such characteristics include the hydrocarbon/water interface, the hydrocarbon/gas interface and/or oil-water interface, among others.
Producing hydrocarbons too quickly from one well in a producing formation relative to other wells in the producing formation (of a single reservoir) may result in stranding hydrocarbons in the formation. For example, improper production may separate an oil pool into multiple portions. In such cases, additional wells must be drilled to produce the oil from the separate pools. Unfortunately, either legal restrictions or economic considerations may not allow another well to be dug thereby stranding the pool of oil and, economically wasting its potential for revenue.
Besides monitoring certain field and production parameters to prevent economic waste of an oilfield, an oilfield's production efficiencies may be maximized by monitoring the production parameters of multiple wells for a given field. For example, if field pressure is dropping for one well in an oil field more quickly than for other wells, the production rate of that one well might be reduced. Alternatively, the production rate of the other wells might be increased. The manner of controlling production rates for different wells for one field is generally known. At issue, however, is obtaining the oil field parameters while the well is being formed and also while it is producing.
In general, control of production of oil wells is a significant concern in the petroleum industry due to the enormous expense involved. As drilling techniques become more sophisticated, monitoring and controlling production even from a specified zone or depth within a zone is an important part of modern production processes.
Consequently, sophisticated computerized controllers have been positioned at the surface of production wells for control of uphole and downhole devices such as motor valves and hydro-mechanical safety valves. Typically, microprocessor (localized) control systems are used to control production from the zones of a well. For example, these controllers are used to actuate sliding sleeves or packers by the transmission of a command from the surface to downhole electronics (e.g., microprocessor controllers) or even to electromechanical control devices placed downhole.
While it is recognized that producing wells will have increased production efficiencies and lower operating costs if surface computer based controllers or downhole microprocessor based controllers are used, their ability to control production from wells and from the zones served by multilateral wells is limited to the ability to obtain and to assimilate the oilfield parameters. For example, there is a great need for realtime oilfield parameters while an oil well is producing. Unfortunately, current systems for reliably providing realtime oilfield parameters during production are not readily available.
Moreover, many prior art systems may require a surface platform at each well for monitoring and controlling the production at a well. The associated equipment, however, is expensive. The combined costs of the equipment and the surface platform often discourage oil field producers from installing a system to monitor and control production properly. Additionally, current technologies often fail to reliably producing real time data. Often, production of a well must be interrupted so that a tool may be deployed into the well to take the desired measurements. Accordingly, the data obtained is expensive in that it has high opportunity costs because of the cessation of production. It also suffers from the fact that the data is not true realtime data.
Some prior art systems measure the electrical resistivity of the ground in a known manner to estimate the characteristics of the reservoir. Because the resistivity of hydrocarbons is higher than water, the measured resistivity in various locations can be of assistance in mapping out the reservoir. For example, the resistivity of hydrocarbons to water may be about 100 to 1 because the formation water contains salt and, generally, is much more conductive.
Systems that map out reservoir parameters by measuring resistivity of the reservoir for a given location are not always reliable, however, because they depend upon the assumption that any present water has a salinity level that renders it more conductive that the hydrocarbons. In those situations where the salinity of the water is low, systems that measure resistivity are not as reliable indicators of hydrocarbons.
Some prior art systems for measuring resistivity include placing an antenna within the ground for generating relatively high power signals that are transmitted through the formation to antennas at the earth surface. The amount of the received current serves to provide an indication of ground resistivity and therefore a suggestion of the formation characteristics in the path formed from the transmitting to the receiving antennas.
Other prior art systems include placing a sensor at the bottom of the well in which the sensor is electrically connected through cabling to equipment on the surface. For example, a pressure sensor may be placed within the well at the bottom to attempt to measure reservoir pressure. One shortfall of this approach, however, is that the sensor does not read reservoir pressure that is unaffected by drilling equipment and formations since the sensor is placed within the well itself.
Other prior art systems include hardwired sensors placed next to or within the well casing in an attempt to reduce the effect that the well equipment has on the reservoir pressure. While such systems perhaps provide better pressure information than those in which the sensor is placed within the well itself, they may not provide accurate pressure information that is unaffected by the well or its equipment.
Alternatives to the above systems include sensors deployed temporarily in a wireline tool system. In some prior art systems, a wireline tool is lowered to a specified location (depth), secured, and deploys a probe into engagement with the formation to obtain samples from which formation parameters may be estimated. One problem with using such wireline tools, however, is that drilling and/or production must be stopped while the wireline tool is deployed and while samples are being taken or while tests are being performed. While such wireline tools provide valuable information, significant expense results from “tripping” the well, if during drilling, or stopping production.
Various techniques have been developed to obtain information concerning downhole conditions using sensors positioned abo
Bryant Ian
Ciglenec Reinhart
Fields Troy
Havlinek Kenneth
Liberman Arthur
Jeffrey Brigitte L.
Neuder William
Ryberg John
Salazar J. L. Jennie
LandOfFree
Well-bore sensor apparatus and method does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Well-bore sensor apparatus and method, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Well-bore sensor apparatus and method will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3249681