Electrophotography – Internal machine environment
Reexamination Certificate
2000-12-22
2002-10-22
Royer, William J. (Department: 2852)
Electrophotography
Internal machine environment
C399S159000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06470158
ABSTRACT:
TECHNICAL FIELD
The invention relates to an image forming apparatus, and particularly to photosensitive drums in which an insert is provided for reducing noise and/or vibration.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Discussion of Background
Image forming apparatuses, such as printers or photocopiers, include a photosensitive member, typically in the form of a photosensitive drum. The performance of the photosensitive drum is of critical importance, since the image being produced (or reproduced) is formed and developed on the drum surface. The developed image is then transferred from the drum to, for example, a sheet of paper. Typically, the drum is formed of metal, such as aluminum, and the metal is anodized or coated with a thin dielectric layer. Normally, the drum is then coated with photogeneration and photoconduction layers over the dielectric layer.
In forming an image, the drum is rotated, and a given location on the outer surface of the drum is thereby rotated past a charging device, an exposure location, a developing location (at which toner is applied), a transfer location (at which the toner image is transferred from the drum to paper), and a cleaning location at which a cleaning blade removes excess toner from the drum so that the process can be repeated. During an image forming operation, as a result of the rotation of the photosensitive drum and its interaction with the various other components of the image forming apparatus, noise and vibration can occur. This is particularly true since the photosensitive drum is a thin-walled metal drum, and thus has a characteristic harmonic sound spectrum which is easily driven by any mechanical resonance.
For example, vibration (and associated noise) can occur from the rotation of the drum, and any imperfections of the drum, the gear flanges attached to the drum, and/or the drive which interacts with the gear flanges of the drum. Further, an alternating current (AC) electric field is applied to the charge roller, and the alternating current can also cause noise and/or vibration of the drum or between the drum and other components. In addition, as the drum rotates past the cleaning blade (which is in contact with the drum), noise is often generated, particularly if the drum surface is roughened by use. This interaction between the drum and cleaning blade is also known as chatter vibration or “stick-slip” vibration. (See, e.g., Chatter Vibration of a Cleaner Blade in Electrophotography, by Kawamoto, in the January/February 1996 issue of Journal of Imaging Science and Technology.) The noise and vibration associated with operation of a photosensitive drum not only presents an annoyance to workers using (or in the vicinity of the image forming apparatus, but also, the noise/vibration can lead to image deterioration or damage to the apparatus. In particular, the vibration can result in poor performance or interaction between the photosensitive drum and one or more of the components with which the drum interacts, including the cleaning blade, the charge roller, the developer device and the like.
Vibration may also cause image blurring especially with the current trend to higher resolution devices (evolution from 300 to greater than 1200 dots per inch). For example, if the cleaning blade does not properly remove residual toner, undesirable resolution of character images can occur in subsequent images. Further, if the drum is not charged or developed properly, the resulting image can have white spaces where the image has not been properly formed, developed or transferred, or black spots where undesired toner has been transferred to the sheet of paper. Noise problems can also occur as a result of the generation of gases (ozone) which occurs during an image forming operation, however this noise is typically relatively small.
To eliminate noise and/or vibration, the physical characteristics of the drum can be modified, for example, by increasing the thickness of the drum. Thus, the drum can be designed so that its natural frequency differs from that of other components of the apparatus and/or that of the process cartridge (the unit within which the drum is disposed). As a result, the vibrations are eliminated or reduced, or the frequency of the noise which might occur can be shifted so that it is outside of the audible range. However, increasing the thickness of the drum can make the drum more expensive to manufacture, particularly if the tooling utilized to manufacture a drum must be replaced. Moreover, when photosensitive drums are manufactured as replacement parts, they will often be inserted into process cartridges of another manufacturer. The process cartridge could be refurbished or a newly manufactured replacement process cartridge of a different manufacturer than that of the photosensitive drum, and the manufacturer/refurbisher of the process cartridge could change (or the design of a given manufacturer/refurbisher could change). Thus, it can be difficult to simply select a thickness of the drum which will be suitable for avoiding noise problems, since even if a thickness is selected for a certain process cartridge, that thickness could be unsuitable for another process cartridge. As a result, noise problems can be particularly problematic with photosensitive drums manufactured as replacement parts.
A further difficultly which can arise with photosensitive drums is that the roundness or circularity of the drum can vary over time, which can also lead to image deterioration. The roundness or circularity of the drum can more rapidly deteriorate if the drum is vibrating and contacting other components disposed about the drum. This problem can also be reduced by providing a thicker drum, however as discussed above, increasing the thickness of the drum can increase the cost, from a materials standpoint and/or the requirement for new tooling.
An alternate solution which has been utilized in the past for solving noise and/or vibration problems has been to insert plugs within the photosensitive drum. U.S. Pat. No. 5,488,459 to Tsuda et al. discloses an example of such an approach. With this solution, a disk or cylindrical object is inserted into the drum, and the insert provides additional weighting to the drum to alter the mass/frequency characteristics of the drum. However, the use of plug-type inserts is undesirable for a number of reasons. First, the plug is often required to be positioned at a precise location within the drum, which can complicate the manufacturing process. Further, the plug must be secured in place, which can require the use of an adhesive, thus further complicating the manufacture/assembly process. Further, the plug must be precisely manufactured. If it is too large, it could cause deformation of the drum, or require a high insertion force, which complicates the assembly process.
For example, it is ideal to use expanding chucks to hold a photosensitive drum by its inner surface during certain manufacturing processes, since damage to the outer surface of the drum is prevented. However, expanding chucks have limited holding ability. Therefore, if a high insertion force is required to insert a plug into a photosensitive drum, it may not be possible to use an expanding chuck to hold the drum during insertion without distorting the shape of the drum. On the other hand, if the plug is too small, it can be difficult to position the plug within the drum and secure the plug in place. Thus, the use of a plug or weight which is inserted inside of the drum has been less than optimal.
Another problem that has arisen with respect to inserts that are bonded to the inside of a photosensitive drum, is that in recycling such equipment, dissimilar materials must be separated from each other. For example, photosensitive drums are typically made from aluminum, while inserts are typically made of rubbers, plastics or foams. Therefore, in order to recycle the drum, the drum must be separated from the insert. If, however, the insert has been bonded to the inside of the photosensitive drum with an adhesive, extreme measures must be taken to remove
Fritz Richard
Russell Laurie A.
Zogg Jon
Mitsubishi Chemical America, Inc.
Royer William J.
LandOfFree
Weighted noise reducing device for photosensitive drum of an... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Weighted noise reducing device for photosensitive drum of an..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Weighted noise reducing device for photosensitive drum of an... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2996269