Ships – Displacement-type hull
Reexamination Certificate
2002-10-01
2003-11-18
Avila, Stephen (Department: 3617)
Ships
Displacement-type hull
C114S312000, C440S038000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06647909
ABSTRACT:
BACKGROUND
1. Field of the Invention
The invention relates to hull shapes for ships and submarines that substantially eliminate waves caused by movement in or on the water.
2. Description of the Related Art
A traditional hull that is found in the prior art has a pointed end at the bow, and a blunt transom at the stern. When moving forward through the water, the bow generates a bow wave and the stern generates a stern wave and a transverse wave. The vessel also generates pressure waves directed downward. Transverse waves are generated by both sharp and blunt-end sterns.
Generating these waves requires displacing large masses of water, does not assist with the efficiency or the seaworthiness of the vessel, and wastes a great deal of energy. These waves also present a hazard to other vessels, and can be a source of danger or discomfort to their crews and passengers. One example is an accident that occurred in August, 1999, in the Cape Cod Canal. The admiralty court found that the accident was caused by the large waves generated by a passing ship. The accident caused $1.3 million in damage. Large waves also greatly contribute to bank and channel erosion, and weaken bridge and pier supports. It is apparent that a vessel hull that reduces or eliminates bow, stern, and transverse waves would be very beneficial.
Others have attempted to modify the hull design to reduce or eliminate waves. One of them is U.S. Pat. No. 6,112,687 (the '687 patent), which is not admitted to being prior art by its mention in this Background section. In this patent, a “displacement body” is disposed on the underside of the hull and shaped to cancel the waves the hull would otherwise make. This hull does not take pressure waves generated in the downward direction into account at all, and would only be efficient at its rated hull speed.
Another example is disclosed in the U.S. Pat. No. 5,954,009 (the '009 patent), which teaches the application of a “wake reflector system” disposed about a traditional hull shape to contain the bow, stern, and transverse waves. The specification claims that the system is applicable to both surface vessels and submarines. Like the '687 patent, this patent does not take waves generated in the downward direction into account, and it does not attempt to reduce the formation of the waves themselves. The waves are only contained until the vessel has traveled clear of the zone of their immediate effect.
What is needed, therefore, is a vessel hull that does not create bow, stern, or transverse waves when moving through the water.
SUMMARY
REFERENCES:
patent: 2997013 (1961-08-01), Rice
patent: 4767370 (1988-08-01), Campbell
patent: 5088433 (1992-02-01), Osawa et al.
patent: 5178085 (1993-01-01), Hsu
patent: 5333444 (1994-08-01), Meng
patent: 5402743 (1995-04-01), Holderman
patent: 5438947 (1995-08-01), Tam
patent: 5497722 (1996-03-01), English
patent: 5503100 (1996-04-01), Shaw
patent: 5544610 (1996-08-01), Harding
patent: 5592895 (1997-01-01), Schmidt
patent: 5954009 (1999-09-01), Esmiol
patent: RE36879 (2000-09-01), Schoell
patent: 6112687 (2000-09-01), Eder
patent: 6167829 (2001-01-01), Lang
patent: 6250245 (2001-06-01), Robinson et al.
patent: 6250246 (2001-06-01), Hubley
patent: 6314903 (2001-11-01), Robinson et al.
patent: 6345584 (2002-02-01), Mascellaro
patent: 6526903 (2003-03-01), Robinson et al.
Avila Stephen
Decker Phillip E.
LandOfFree
Waveless hull does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Waveless hull, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Waveless hull will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3143886