Wavelength-slicing architecture for wavelength...

Details Wavelength-slicing architecture for wavelength... Wavelength-slicing architecture for wavelength...

2000-09-21

2003-11-04

Lee, John D. (Department: 2874)

Optical waveguides

With optical coupler

C385S024000, C398S082000

Reexamination Certificate

active

06643421

ABSTRACT:

FIELD OF THE INVENTION
This invention relates to nanophotonic devices, and, more particularly, to optical resonator devices used in demultiplexing devices.
BACKGROUND OF INVENTION
Wave-division multiplexing (WDM), and similarly, dense WDM (DWDM) and ultra-dense WDM (UDWDM), provide the ability to simultaneously transmit multiple signals through a single optical fiber or waveguide, with each signal being transmitted on a separate wavelength or channel and each typically carrying either 2.5 or 10-gigabit-per-second signals.
The International Telecommunications Union (ITU) has set standards for the basic wavelength and channel spacing used in WDM. Light, like radio waves has a wavelength. For light this is measured in nanometers (millionths of a millimeter). The ITU standards set a “window” from 1500 nm to 1535 nm for WDM, subdivided into 43 “channels”, sometimes referred to as “colors”, whose centers are separated by 0.8 nm. This represents a channel bandwidth of about 100 GHz regarded as the current practical limit for manufacturing precision tunable optical transceivers. In future, however, the channel spacing will be halved to provide up to 80 channels per fiber.
In practice, each channel can be treated as an independent optical transmission path and therefore can be modulated at whatever speed is appropriate for an application. A hierarchy of optical fiber transmission speeds has been standardized for the two major optical network systems—Synchronous Optical NETwork (SONET) in the US, and the ITU's standard Synchronous Digital Hierarchy (SDH) in the rest of the world. There are differences between the terminology and the details of hierarchy of speeds but the standards are not completely incompatible.
DWDM combines multiple optical signals so that they can be amplified as a group and transported over a single fiber or waveguide to increase capacity. Each signal carried can be at a different rate (OC-3/12/24, etc.) and in a different format (SONET, ATM, data, etc.) For example, a DWDM network with a mix of SONET signals operating at OC-48 (2.5 Gbps) and OC-192 (10 Gbps) over a DWDM infrastructure can achieve capacities of over 40 Gbps. A system with DWDM can achieve all this gracefully while maintaining the same degree of system performance, reliability, and robustness as current transport systems—or even surpassing it. Future DWDM terminals will carry up to 80 wavelengths of OC-48, a total of 200 Gbps, or up to 40 wavelengths of OC-192, a total of 400 Gbps—which is enough capacity to transmit 90,000 volumes of an encyclopedia in one second.
Micro-ring resonators are known in the prior art, such as that disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,926,496. In addition, it is known in the prior art to use micro-ring resonators as filters, wherein the resonators act to separate desired wavelengths (i.e., channels) of a light signal from a DWDM input light signal. For example,
FIG. 1
depicts a prior art filter arrangement
1
having an input waveguide
2
, with an input port
3
and an output port
4
, and an output waveguide
5
, with an output port
6
. A micro-ring resonator
7
is interposed between the input waveguide
2
and the output waveguide
5
and is tuned to a predetermined wavelength. To understand the operation of the filter
1
, with a DWDM light signal propagating through the input waveguide
2
(in a direction from the input port
3
and towards the output port
4
), part of the light signal (i.e., the wavelength of the input signal that is on-resonance with the resonator
7
) will couple from the input waveguide to the resonator
7
. That wavelength is thus demultiplexed or dropped from the input signal. The resonator
7
, in turn, couples that wavelength to the output waveguide
5
and a light signal having that particular wavelength propagate through the output waveguide
5
towards the output port
6
. The remaining wavelengths of the input signal, i.e., those which are not on-resonance with the resonator
7
, by-pass the resonator
7
and continue propagating through the input waveguide
2
and towards the output port
4
.
Using this basic methodology, full-scale demultiplexing systems have been built for lightwave systems. With reference to
FIG. 2
, a demultiplexing device
10
is shown having a single input waveguide
11
, with an input port
12
and an output port
13
. A series of micro-ring resonators
14
A-D are arranged along the length of the input waveguide
11
. Although not shown in
FIG. 2
, the resonators
14
A-D would generally be each formed with a different radius; with the radius of the resonator determining, at least in part, the resonant wavelength of the resonator. Additionally, an output waveguide
15
A-D is provided for each resonator
14
A-D, with each output waveguide
15
A-D having an output port
16
A-D. The demultiplexing device
10
is referred to as a 1×5 device: the first number (1) signifying a single input, while the second number signifies the number of outputs (5). Other combinations are possible, including 1×8 and 1×16. With the structural arrangement of the device
10
, a DWDM light signal propagating through the input waveguide
11
, in a direction from the input port
12
and towards the output port
13
, will be sequentially demultiplexed (also known as “demuxed”) by the resonators
14
A-D into four different wavelengths, with a remainder signal portion (i.e., those wavelengths that are not demuxed) propagating through the input waveguide
11
. The various wavelengths will respectively propagate towards the output ports
13
and
16
A-D.
With reference to
FIG. 3
, a chart is provided to symbolically represent the coupling of wavelengths of a light signal by a resonator. The arrows along line A′ represent different light signal wavelengths or channels LS. Trapezoidal blocks T on line B′ represents the transfer characteristic of a resonator, such as resonator
7
(FIG.
3
). With the DWM light signal having a plurality of wavelengths or channels propagating through input waveguide
2
, the wavelengths or channels LS that coincide with the trapezoidal blocks T are coupled to the resonator
7
, as represented by coupled wavelengths or channels CLS shown on line C′ in FIG.
3
. Wavelengths that are not coincident with the trapezoidal blocks T by-pass the resonator
7
and continue to propagate through (or are guided by) the input waveguide
2
, as depicted on line D′ and identified as SLS.
The spacing S between the trapezoidal blocks T is a free spectral range (FSR) characteristic of the resonator
7
, whereas, the full-width half-maximum (FWHM) width W of the trapezoidal blocks T is indicative of the linewidth of the resonator
7
. In addition, the finesse F of a resonator is equal to the FSR/linewidth. As can be appreciated, a narrow linewidth will result in a large finesse F, while a large linewidth will result in a small finesse F.
Although effective, the system of
FIG. 2
has limitations. Each of the resonators
14
A-D requires a narrow linewidth to only select a specific wavelength of the input signal. Where a large number of wavelengths are required to be demultiplexed, the finesse of the resonators
14
A-D will be relatively high, thereby requiring relatively stringent tolerances, finer tunability, etc., and high manufacturing standards.
Thus, there exists a need in the art for an optical device that overcomes the above-described shortcomings of the prior art.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The subject invention overcomes the deficiencies of the prior art, wherein a demultiplexing device is provided for selectively demultiplexing wavelengths or channels of a DWDM light signal. The device includes a plurality of resonators, preferably micro-ring, which are arranged to “slice” a signal into wavelengths or channels (those terms being used interchangeably herein), rather than couple desired wavelengths. By “slicing” the signal in sequential steps, the resonators can each be formed with a lower finesse than resonators arranged in a prior art device. Prior art demultiplexing devices using r

Affiliated with

Also associated with

Rating

Wavelength-slicing architecture for wavelength... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Wavelength-slicing architecture for wavelength..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Wavelength-slicing architecture for wavelength... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

Comments { 0 }

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3153344