Data processing: database and file management or data structures – Database design – Data structure types
Reexamination Certificate
1999-05-17
2002-07-02
Breene, John (Department: 2177)
Data processing: database and file management or data structures
Database design
Data structure types
C345S215000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06415304
ABSTRACT:
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
This invention relates generally to automated services, and more particularly to waiting prior to performing such services for enhancement thereof.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Computer applications such as messaging and scheduling applications have become important applications in many computer users' lives. Messaging programs generally allow a user to send and receive electronic mail (e.g., messages) to and from other computer users, for example, over a local- or a wide-area network, or over an intranet, extranet, or the Internet. Scheduling programs generally allow a user to track appointments in a calendar. More sophisticated scheduling programs allow one user to schedule a group meeting with other computer users—checking the latter users' schedule availability, and receiving confirmation from the users upon them accepting or rejecting the group meeting appointment.
Within the prior art, however, messaging and scheduling programs are generally not very well integrated, even if they are components within the same computer program. For example, a user may receive a message from a colleague stating “Looking forward to seeing you at 2 p.m. on Thursday.” Generally, however, the prior art does not provide for automatically directing the scheduling program to make a meeting appointment at 2 p.m. on Thursday. Instead, typically the user who has received the message has to open the scheduling program, access Thursday's calendar, and manually enter an appointment at 2 p.m. on Thursday's calendar. Because of the many steps required to go from reading the message within the messaging program to entering the information into the scheduling program, many users choose not to even use scheduling programs, or to only use them sparingly.
For these and other reasons, there is a need for the present invention.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The invention relates to waiting prior to engaging an automated service, for enhancement thereof. In one embodiment, a computer-implemented method first determines an automated service to be performed. The method waits a predetermined time between a minimum time and a maximum time, before performing the automated service. In one embodiment, the method determines the predetermined time by performing a statistical regression as to the predetermined time that should be waited based on a length of a received text.
The invention includes computer-implemented methods, machine-readable media, computerized systems, and computers of varying scopes. Other aspects, embodiments and advantages of the invention, beyond those described here, will become apparent by reading the detailed description and with reference to the drawings.
REFERENCES:
patent: 5864848 (1999-01-01), Horvitz et al.
patent: 5867822 (1999-02-01), Sankar
patent: 5948058 (1999-09-01), Kudoh et al.
patent: 6182118 (2000-01-01), Finney et al.
patent: 6047260 (2000-04-01), Levinson
patent: 6101480 (2000-08-01), Conmy et al.
patent: 6016478 (2000-12-01), Zhang et al.
patent: 6167567 (2000-12-01), Chiles et al.
patent: 6199102 (2001-03-01), Cobb
patent: 6278996 (2001-08-01), Richardson et al.
Microsoft Press Computer Dictionary, Microsoft Press, Third Edition, p. 403.*
U.S. application No. 09/192,001, filed Nov. 13, 1998.
U.S. application No. 09/455,477, filed Apr. 6, 1998.
U.S. application No. 08/684,003, filed Apr. 6, 1988.
Eric Horvitz, Matthew Bary, Display of Information for Time-Critical Decision-Making, Proceedings of the Eleventh Conference on Uncertainty in Artifical Intelligence, Montreal, Aug. 1995.
Eric Horvitz, Jack Breese, David Heckerman, David Hovel, Koos Rommelse, The Lumiere Project: Bayesian User Modeling for Inferring the Goals and Needs of Software Users, Proceedings of the Fourteenth Conference on Uncertainty in Artifical Intelligence, Madison, WI, Jul. 1998. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, pp. 256-265.
Susan Dumais, John Platt, David Heckerman, Mehran Sahami, Inductive Learning Algorithms and Representations for Text Categorization, Proceedings of ACM-CIKM98, Nov. 1998.
Ben Shneiderman, Pattie Maes, Direct Manipulation vs Interface Agents: Excerpts form debates at IUI 97 and CHI 97, interactions, Nov.-Dec. 1997, pp. 42-61.
M. Sahami, S. Dumais, D. Heckerman, E. Horvitz, A Bayesian Approach to Filtering Junk E-mail, AAAI Workshop on Text Classification, Jul. 1998, Madison, Wisconsin, AAAI Technical Report WW-98-05.
Amin & Turocy LLP
Breene John
Microsoft Corporation
Rayyan Susan
LandOfFree
Waiting prior to engaging in action for enhancement of... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Waiting prior to engaging in action for enhancement of..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Waiting prior to engaging in action for enhancement of... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2878362