Video coding method for a plasma display panel

Computer graphics processing and selective visual display system – Plural physical display element control system – Display elements arranged in matrix

Reexamination Certificate

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

C315S169400, C345S690000

Reexamination Certificate

active

06765548

ABSTRACT:

The invention relates to a method of coding video for a plasma display panel. More particularly, the invention relates to the coding of the grey levels of a type of panel with separate addressing and sustaining.
Plasma display panels, called hereafter PDPs, are flat-type display screens. There are two large families of PDPs, namely PDPs whose operation is of the DC type and those whose operation is of the AC type. In general, PDPs comprise two insulating tiles (or substrates), each carrying one or more arrays of electrodes and defining between them a space filled with gas. The tiles are joined together so as to define intersections between the electrodes of the said arrays. Each electrode intersection defines an elementary cell to which a gas space corresponds, which gas space is partially bounded by barriers and in which an electrical discharge occurs when the cell is activated. The electrical discharge causes an emission of UV rays in the elementary cell. Phosphors (red, green or blue) deposited on the walls of the cell convert the UV rays into visible light.
In the case of AC-type PDPs, there are two types of cell architecture, one called a matrix architecture and the other called a coplanar architecture. Although these structures are different, the operation of an elementary cell is substantially the same. Each cell may be in the ignited or “on” state or in the extinguished or “off” state. A cell may be maintained in one of these states by sending a succession of pulses, called sustain pulses, throughout the duration over which it is desired to maintain this state. A cell is turned on, or addressed, by sending a larger pulse, usually called an address pulse. A cell is turned off, or erased, by nullifying the charges within the cell using a damped discharge. To obtain various grey levels, use is made of the eye's integration phenomenon by modulating the durations of the on and off states using subscans, or subframes, over the duration of display of an image.
In order to be able to achieve temporal ignition modulation of each elementary cell, two so-called “addressing modes” are mainly used. A first addressing mode, called “addressing while displaying”, consists in addressing each row of cells while sustaining the other rows of cells, the addressing taking place row by row in a shifted manner. A second addressing mode, called “addressing and display separation”, consists in addressing, sustaining and erasing all of the cells of the panel during three separate periods. For more details concerning these two addressing modes, a person skilled in the art may, for example, refer to U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,420,602 and 5,446,344.
FIG. 1
shows the basic time division of the “addressing and display separation” mode for displaying an image. The total display time Ttot of the image is 16.6 or 20 ms, depending on the country. During the display time, eight subscans SC
1
to SC
8
are effected so as to allow 256 grey levels per cell, each subscan making it possible for an elementary cell to be “on” or “off” for an illumination time Tec which is a multiple of a value To. Hereafter, reference will be made to an illumination weight p, where p corresponds to an integer such that Tec=p*To. The total duration of a subscan comprises an erasure time Tef, an address time Ta and the illumination time Tec specific to each subscan. The address time Ta can also be decomposed into n times an elementary time Tae, which corresponds to the addressing of one row. Since the sum of the illumination times Tec needed for a maximum grey level is equal to the maximum illumination time Tmax, we have the following equation: Ttot=m*(Tef+n*Tae)+Tmax, in which m represents the number of subscans.
FIG. 1
corresponds to a binary decomposition of the illumination time. This binary representation has numerous drawbacks. A problem of false contours (or “contouring”) has been identified for quite some time.
The problem of false contours stems from the proximity of two areas whose grey levels are very close but whose illumination instants are decorrelated. The worst case corresponds to a transition between the levels
127
and
128
. This is because the grey level
127
corresponds to an illumination for the first seven subscans SC
1
to SC
7
, while the level
128
corresponds to the illumination of the eighth subscan SC
8
. Two areas of the screen placed one beside the other, having the levels
127
and
128
, are never illuminated at the same time. When the image is static and the observer's eyes do not move over the screen, temporal integration takes place relatively well (if any flicker effect is ignored) and two areas with relatively close grey levels are seen. On the other hand, when the two areas move over the screen (and/or the observer's eye moves), the integration time slot changes screen area and is shifted from one area to another for a certain number of cells. The shift in the eye's integration time slot from an area of level
127
to an area of level
128
has the effect of integrating so that the cells are off over the period of one frame, which results in the appearance of a dark contour of the area. Conversely, shifting the eye's integration time slot from an area of level
128
to an area of level
127
has the effect of integrating so that the cells are lit over the duration of one frame, which results in the appearance of a light contour of the area. This phenomenon is manifested, when working on pixels consisting of three elementary cells (red, green and blue), as false coloured contours.
The explained phenomenon occurs at all level transitions where the switched illumination weights are totally or almost totally different. Switchings of high weight are more annoying than switchings of low weight because of their magnitude. The resulting effect may be perceptible to a greater or lesser extent depending on the switched weights and on their positions. Thus, the contouring effect may also occur with levels that are quite far apart (for example 63-128), but it is less shocking for the eye as it then corresponds to a very visible level (or colour) transition.
To remedy this problem of contouring, several solutions have been implemented. One solution consists in “breaking up” the high weights, this involving adding extra subscans. Only the total time of display of the image Ttot=m*(Tef+n*Tae)+Tmax remains fixed, thereby resulting in a drop in the time Tmax (since Tef and Tae are incompressible durations) and hence a drop in maximum brightness of the screen. It is possible to use up to 10 subscans while having correct brightness. With 10 subscans, the maximum illumination time Tmax is, currently, 30% of the total time whereas the erasure and address time is of the order of 70%.
FIG. 2
represents an example of addressing using 10 subscans SC
1
to SC
10
in which the high weights are broken up into two.
In order to reduce the considerable transitions and to increase the number of subscans without reducing the brightness of the screen, one technique consists in simultaneously scanning two successive rows for certain illumination values. We then have the following equation Ttot=m
1
*(Tef+n*Tae)+m
2
*(Tef+n/2*Tae)+Tmax. The erasure time Tef being negligible relative to n*Tae, we have the equivalence Ttot≅(m
1
+m
2
/2)*(Tef+n*Tae)+Tmax. These simultaneous subscans halve the address time, and thus make it possible to add extra subscans without reducing Tmax.
FIG. 3
represents an example of addressing with 11 subscans S
1
to S
11
. Subscans S
1
and S
2
corresponding to the lowest illumination times are carried out on two rows at the same time so as to obtain an overall address time for these two subscans which is equal to the address time of a single subscan. If subscans common to two successive rows are performed for the illumination weights
1
,
2
,
4
and
8
, it is possible to obtain 12 subscans so as to eliminate the transitions of weight
64
. The problem with this solution is however the los

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Video coding method for a plasma display panel does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Video coding method for a plasma display panel, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Video coding method for a plasma display panel will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3222700

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.