Vibratory transducer

Measuring and testing – Volume or rate of flow – Mass flow by imparting angular or transverse momentum to the...

Reexamination Certificate

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

Reexamination Certificate

active

06666098

ABSTRACT:

FIELD OF THE IINVENTION
This invention relates to a vibratory transducer which is particularly suited for use in a Coriolis mass flowmeter.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
To determine the mass flow rate of a fluid flowing in a pipe and particularly of a liquid, use is frequently made of measuring devices which induce Coriolis forces in the fluid and derive therefrom a measurement signal representative of mass flow rate by means of a vibratory transducer and control and evaluation electronics connected thereto.
Such transducers and particularly their use in Coriolis mass flow meters have been known and in industrial use for a long time. U.S. Pat. No. 5,549,009, for example, discloses a Coriolis mass flowmeter incorporating a vibratory transducer which responds to the mass flow rate of a fluid flowing in a pipe and comprises:
a curved flow tube for conducting the fluid which vibrates in operation and communicates with the pipe via an inlet-side tube section and an outlet-side tube section.
an antivibrator which extends essentially parallel to and oscillates in a phase opposition to the flow tube and is mechanically connected with the flow tube
by means of at least a first coupler on the inlet side and
by means of at least a second coupler on the outlet side;
an excitation system for driving the flow tube and the antivibrator at an excitation frequency; and
a sensor system for sensing inlet-side and outlet-side vibrations of the flow tube,
wherein a torsional rigidity of the inlet-side tube section and a torsional rigidity of the outlet-side tube section are adapted to one another and to an internal system supported by the two tube sections and formed by at least the flow tube, the antivibrator, the excitation system, and the sensor system such that the internal system is suspended essentially “torsionally soft”, i.e., in a torsionally nonrigid manner.
As is well known, vibrating flow tubes, for example U-, V-, or &OHgr;-shaped tubes, if excited into cantilever vibrations in a first natural mode, can cause Coriolis forces in the fluid passing therethrough. In such transducers, the first natural vibration mode chosen for the flow tube is usually the mode in which the flow tube oscillates about a longitudinal axis of the transducer at a lowest natural resonance frequency.
The Coriolis forces thus produced in the fluid result in cantilever vibrations of an at least second natural mode being superimposed on the excited, pendulum-like cantilever vibrations of the so-called useful mode, the vibrations of the second mode being equal in frequency to those of the useful mode. In transducers of the kind described, these cantilever vibrations forced by Coriolis forces, the so-called Coriolis mode, commonly correspond to the natural mode in which the flow tube also performs torsional vibrations about a vertical axis that is perpendicular to the longitudinal axis. As a result of the superposition of the useful and Coriolis modes, the flow tube vibrations sensed on the inlet and outlet sides of the tube by means of the sensor system have a measurable phase difference, which is also dependent on mass flow rate.
Frequently, the flow tubes of such transducers, which are used in Coriolis mass flowmeters, for example, are excited in operation at an instantaneous resonance frequency of the first natural mode, particularly with the vibration amplitude maintained constant. As this resonance frequency is also dependent on the instantaneous density of the fluid in particular, commercially available Coriolis mass flowmeters can also be used to measure the density of moving fluids.
One advantage of a curved tube shape is that thermally induced expansion, particularly in flow tubes with a high expansion coefficient, produce virtually no or only very slight mechanical stresses in the flow tube itself and/or in the connected pipe. Another advantage of curved flow tubes is that the flow tube can be made relatively long, so that high sensitivity of the transducer to the mass flow rate to be measured can be achieved with a relatively short mounting length and relatively low excitation energy. These circumstances permit the flow tube to be made from materials having a high expansion coefficient and/or a high modulus of elasticity, such as special steel.
In vibratory transducers with a straight flow tube, the latter is commonly made from a material having at least a lower expansion coefficient and possibly a lower modulus of elasticity than special steel in order to avoid axial stresses and achieve sufficient measuring sensitivity. Therefore, such straight flow tubes are preferably made of titanium or zirconium, but because of the higher material cost and the generally higher machining cost, such tubes are far more expensive than those made of special steel.
Transducers of the kind disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,549,009, i.e., transducers with a single curved flow tube and with an antivibrator, particularly one extending parallel to the flow tube, have proved especially effective in applications where the fluid to be measured has an essentially constant or only very slightly varying density. For such applications, it is readily possible by means of the antivibrator oscillating in operation at the same frequency as, but in phase opposition to, the flow tube to nearly completely neutralize those transverse forces which were induced in the transducer as a result of alternating lateral motions of the oscillating flow tube, thus virtually keeping such transverse forces away from the connected pipe.
If used for fluids with widely varying densities, such a transducer has practically the same disadvantage as a transducer without an antivibrator, particularly as compared to transducers with two parallel flow tubes.
It turned out that the aforementioned forces produced in the transducer cannot be completely balanced with such an antivibrator. As a result, the above-mentioned internal system, oscillating as a whole about the transducer's longitudinal axis, may also start to vibrate laterally. Accordingly, these lateral vibrations of the internal system force an additional elastic deformation of the inlet-side and outlet-side tube sections and consequently may cause flexural vibrations in the connected pipe. In addition, such lateral vibrations may cause cantilever vibrations very similar to, and thus practically indistinguishable from, the Coriolis mode to be excited in the empty flow tube, and this, in turn, would render the measurement signal that ought to represent the mass flow rate of the fluid unusable.
On the other hand, as is well known, a significant advantage of a single flow tube transducer over a transducer having two parallel flow tubes is that no manifolds are necessary to connect the flow tubes with the pipe. Such manifolds, on the one hand, are expensive to make and, on the other hand, represent flow bodies with a strong tendency to sedimentation or clogging.
One way of reducing density-dependent transverse forces is described, for example, in U.S. Pat. No. 5,287,754 or in U.S. Pat. No. 5,705,754. In the transducers disclosed therein, the transverse forces produced by the vibrating single flow tube, which oscillate at medium or high frequencies, are kept away from the pipe by means of an antivibrator that is heavy compared to the flow tube, and by coupling the flow tube to the pipe relatively loosely, i.e., practically by means of a mechanical low-pass filter. Unfortunately, however, this causes the antivibrator mass required to achieve sufficient damping of the transverse forces to increase disproportionately with the nominal diameter of the flow tube.
This represents a big disadvantage for such transducers, since the use of such massive components always entails both increased assembly costs during manufacture and increased costs during installation of the measuring device in the pipe. In addition, it is difficult to ensure that the lowest natural frequency of the transducer, which decreases with increasing mass, is still far from the likewise rather low natural frequencies of the connected pipe. Thus, us

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Vibratory transducer does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Vibratory transducer, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Vibratory transducer will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3112669

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.