Vessel evaluation methods, apparatus, computer-readable...

Data processing: measuring – calibrating – or testing – Measurement system – Performance or efficiency evaluation

Reexamination Certificate

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

C702S183000, C600S454000, C600S504000, C600S506000, C600S513000

Reexamination Certificate

active

10383574

ABSTRACT:
Methods, apparatuses, media and signals for evaluating a vessel. One method includes receiving at least one measurement of a physical dimension of the vessel, and producing an indication of abnormality in the vessel, in response to the at least one received measurement and at least one population-based parameter for the vessel. Producing may include producing an indication of stenosis of the vessel, in response to the physical dimension measurement and a population-based reference dimension for the vessel. This may include producing a population-based percent stenosis value in response to a ratio of the physical dimension measurement to the population-based reference dimension. Producing may further include identifying a shape characteristic of the vessel, which may include producing a tapering comparison value in response to the tapering of the vessel and a population-based average tapering value. The vessel may include a coronary artery segment, for example.

REFERENCES:
patent: 4103679 (1978-08-01), Aronson
patent: 4391148 (1983-07-01), Sainz et al.
patent: 5146414 (1992-09-01), McKown et al.
patent: 5150292 (1992-09-01), Hoffmann et al.
patent: 5275169 (1994-01-01), Afromowitz et al.
patent: 5280787 (1994-01-01), Wilson et al.
patent: 5505204 (1996-04-01), Picot et al.
patent: 5792660 (1998-08-01), Spillert et al.
patent: 6071242 (2000-06-01), Lin
patent: 6088488 (2000-07-01), Hardy et al.
patent: 6258032 (2001-07-01), Hammesfahr
patent: 6299583 (2001-10-01), Eggers et al.
patent: 6322516 (2001-11-01), Masuda et al.
patent: 6503202 (2003-01-01), Hossack et al.
patent: 6615071 (2003-09-01), Casscells et al.
patent: 6656122 (2003-12-01), Davidson et al.
patent: 6692443 (2004-02-01), Crutchfield et al.
patent: 6696040 (2004-02-01), Driehuys
patent: 6740038 (2004-05-01), Davidson et al.
patent: 2002/0037251 (2002-03-01), Driehuys
patent: 2002/0052551 (2002-05-01), Sinclair et al.
patent: 2002/0095087 (2002-07-01), Mourad et al.
patent: 2002/0143369 (2002-10-01), Hill et al.
patent: 2003/0236458 (2003-12-01), Hochman
patent: 2004/0024295 (2004-02-01), Cook et al.
patent: 2004/0059212 (2004-03-01), Abreu
patent: 2004/0223636 (2004-11-01), Edic et al.
patent: 2004/0230131 (2004-11-01), Kassab et al.
M. Zubaid, C. Buller and GB John Mancini, “Normal angiographic tapering of the coronary arteries”, Can J Cardiol, vol. 18, No. 9, Sep. 2002, pp. 973-980.
J. Theodore Dodge Jr., et al., “Lumen Diameter of Normal Human Coronary Arteries”, Circulation, vol. 86, No. 1, Jul. 1992, pp. 232-246.
Rex N. MacAlpin, et al., “Human Coronary Artery Size During Life”, Diagnostic Radiology, vol. 108, Sep. 1973, p. 567-576.
Wing-Hung Leung, et al., “Quantitative Arteriography of Apparently Normal Coronary Segments With Nearby or Distant Disease Suggests Presence of Occult, Nonvisualized Atherosclerosis”, J Am Coll Cardiol 1995, vol. 25, No. 2, Feb. 1995, p. 311-317. (Abstract).
John K-J. Li, et al., “Nonuniform geometric and elastic properties of arteries: local and global characterization”, IEEE 26thAnnual Northeast Bioengineering Conference, 2000, p. 37-38. (Abstract).
M. Jackson, et al., “Development of a microcomputer based system for the quantification of coronary arterial disease”, Journal of Microcomputer Applications, vol. 12, No. 3, p. 233-251. (Abstract).
P.D. Edwards, et al., “CT measurement of main pulmonary artery diameter”, British Journal of Radiology, vol. 71, No. 850, Oct. 1998, p. 1018-20. (Abstract).
P.F. Wankling, et al., “Microcomputer based system for the quantification of artery stenosis”, Third International Conference on Image Processing and its Applications, 1989, p. 329-332. (Abstract).
M.S. Hamid, et al., “Quantitative assessment of the geometry of coronary artery stenoses using a microcomputer system”, Comput Eng 1988 Proc., 1988 p. 61-64. (Abstract).
N. Chapman, et al., “Computer algorithms for the automated measurement of retinal arteriolar diameters”, British Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 85, No. 1, Jan. 2001, p. 74-79. (Abstract).
C.P. Xu et al., “Aneurysmal and occlusive atherosclerosis of the human abdominal aorta”, Journal of Vascular Surgery, vol. 33, No. 1, Jan. 2001, p. 91-96. (Abstract).
A. Murray, et al., “Measurement of angioplasty lumen volume and wall compliance: a laboratory study”, Physiological Measurement, vol. 18, No. 1, Feb. 1997, p. 39-47. (Abstract).
J. Lesperance, et al., “Validation of coronary artery saphenous vein bypass graft diameter measurements using quantitative angiography”, International Journal of Cardiac Imaging, vol. 12, No. 4, Dec. 1996, p. 299-303. (Abstract).
S.M. AbdelRahman, et al., “Transesophageal three-dimensional echocardiographic assessment of normal and stenosed coronary arteries”, Echocardiography-A Journal of Cardiovascular Ultrasound and Allied Techniques, vol. 13, No. 5, Sep. 1996, p. 503-510. (Abstract).
J. Haase, et al., “Experimental Validation of Geometric and Densitometric Coronary Measurements on the New-Generation Cardiovascular Angiography Analysis System (CASS-II)”, Catheterization and Cardiovascular Diagnosis, vol. 30, No. 2, Oct. 1993, p. 104-114. (Abstract).
J. Haase, et al., “Can the Same Edge-Detection Algorithm be Applied to Online and Off-line Analysis Systems—Validation of a New Cinefilm-Based Geometric Coronary Measurement Software”, American Heart Journal, vol. 126, No. 2, Aug. 1993, p. 312-321. (Abstract).
F.G. St Goar, et al., “Intravascular Ultrasound Imaging of Angiographically Normal Coronary-Arteries-An Invivo Comparison with Quantitative Angiography”, Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 18, No. 4, Oct. 1991, p. 952-958. (Abstract).
T. Pohl, et al., “Frequency distribution of collateral flow and factors influencing collateral channel development—Functional collateral channel measurement in 450 patients with coronary artery disease”, Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 38, No. 7, Dec. 2001, p. 1872-1878. (Abstract).
H. Teragawa, “Usefulness of flow-mediated dilation of the brachial artery and/or the intima-media thickness of the carotid artery in predicting coronary narrowing in patients suspected of having coronary artery disease”, American Jouranl of Cardiology, vol. 88, No. 10, Nov. 15, 2001, p. 1147-1151. (Abstract).
R.H. Selzer, et al., “Improved common carotid elasticity and intima-media thickness measurements from computer analysis of sequential ultrasound frames”, Atherosclerosis, vol. 154, No. 1, Jan. 2001, p. 185-193. (Abstract).
S.J. Chen et al., “3-D reconstruction of coronary arterial tree to optimize angiographic visualization”, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, vol. 19, No. 4, Apr. 2000, p. 318-336. (Abstract).
G.B. John Mancini et al., “A comparison of quantitative coronary angiography systems using a unique set of in vivo coronary stenosis images”, Can J Cardiol, vol. 17, No. 7, Jul. 2001, pp. 785-791.
Press Release, “Quinton Instrument Company and ScImage, Inc. Announce New Partnership”, Sep. 21, 2000, Bothell, WA.
McPherson DD, Hiratzka LF, Lamberth WC et al. “Delineation of the extent of coronary atherosclerosis by high frequency epicardial echocardiography”, N Eng J Med 1987; 316:304-9.
Arnett EN, Isner JM, Redwood DR et al. “Coronary artery narrowing in coronary heart disease: Comparison of cineangiographic and necropsy findings”, Ann Intern Med 1979; 91:350-6.
Vlodaver Z, Frech R, Van Tassel RA, Edwards JE. “Correlation of the antemortem coronary arteriogram and the postmortem specimen”, Circulation 1973; 47:162-9.
Schwartz JN, Kong Y, Hackel DB, Bartel AG. “Comparison of angiographic and postmortem findings in patients with coronary artery disease”, Am J Cardiol 1975; 36:174-8.
Grondin CM, Dyrda I, Pasternac A, Campeau L, Bourassa MG, Lesperance J. 

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Vessel evaluation methods, apparatus, computer-readable... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Vessel evaluation methods, apparatus, computer-readable..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Vessel evaluation methods, apparatus, computer-readable... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3753802

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.