Television – Format conversion
Reexamination Certificate
2000-08-15
2002-12-03
Miller, John (Department: 2614)
Television
Format conversion
C348S445000, C348S458000, C348S556000, C348S446000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06489997
ABSTRACT:
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The present invention is directed towards versatile video transformation device and adaptive image processing methodology thereof to digitally scan convert, that is, reformat TV raster scan video and particularly high definition (HD) and/or digital DTV video data and associated synchronizing signals, for the purpose of making present standard television sets compatible at low cost with the latest advancements in free HD whilst allowing a multitude of other DTV programs and ancillary data to fill to a greater extent the remaining channel allocations by FCC to TV broadcasters.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Present TV sets are not capable of using HDTV, but rather are limited to a fixed-format and are incompatible with different TV raster formats such as that provided by HDTV. While an amount of versatility (and energy-efficiency) has been provided by U.S. Pat. No. 4,361,785, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein, it is desirable to improve and expand it, particularly, with regard to standard TV sets.
The inexpensive utility of versatility for single frequency standard TV is especially desirable now because of the availability of HDTV and DTV.
In the past, when color TV broadcasts became available, existing monochrome “black & white” TV sets, at the time, could not display the added dimension of color. Viewers could, however, still see in monochrome sets new programs broadcast in color because the novel chrominace signals conveying the hue and saturation (color purity) attributes were rationalized and compressed into the then existing video bandwidth without substantial interaction with the luminance. While the present invention is not directed towards improving the TV set circuitry per se, in so far as DTV system eliminates many visual impairments eg. interline flicker, sync jitter, moire, raster line structure, multipath ghosts, chrominace distortions etc. the picture quality of such TV sets should be markedly improved. This will be accomplished while, most importantly, addressing the broadcaster's desire to allocate, as much as possible, other programs and data communications within the channel assigned to it by the FCC.
In this regard, the FCC has allocated the traditional broadcasters a new channel for DTV which can include “multicasting” several simultaneous programs with conditional access for a nominal fee that would offset the costs of new equipment needed to broadcast DTV and free HDTV and also provide better competition with costly cable TV and satellite TV.
Ironically, the effective expansion of TV channel bandwidth capacity wrought by removal of redundancy in video compression techniques for HDTV appears directed towards the of viewers' desire to receive more channels due to the quality of programming, or lack thereof. The improved quality of higher resolution pictures—that are not really discernible at present distance between set and viewer, is desirable and possibly only equally important to the viewer than the ability to receive additional channels. Accordingly, it appears that a need exists to provide a higher quality picture as that now made available by HDTV while allowing the broadcaster to utilize to the greater extent, the remaining portion of the channel allocation for additional programming or “data casting”.
As to the first objective, which, if addressed properly, allows the second objective to be met, the history of TV evolution reveals the perennial problems needing solution to meet the resolution revolution that now requires brighter, smarter picture processing to live up to HDTV promises of 35 mm quality.
Naturally, the periphery of the picture is blurred by TV cameras that pan, tilt and track to keep in the center of TV moving images that are center of attraction such as an ice skater or player with the football, basketball, puck etc. From empirical human factors data obtained from TV trackers and “moving window” scan converters (Rand Corp., RCA Corp., Fairchild Camera et al.) a target should move through the standard TV field of view in 4 seconds or more but definitely no faster than one second. One second equals time for refreshing 60 fields and also 3.4 fixations of 5×5 degrees at 0.3 second assuming 480 scan lines each subtend arc minute defined as 20/20 vision.
Thus those conclusions that an object ought not to move more than 1-to-4 scan line in {fraction (1/60)}th second field is consistent with video compression ratios of 30-120 since 1.7%-0.42% or less is changed in either or both axes.
The prior art of monochrome video scan conversion was considered to be a linear system using analog and later digital means with predictable performance. One of the earliest scan converters involved a TV camera scanning a radar PPI plan position indictor whereby the video values at “rho-theta” (range and angle) polar coordinates driving an oscilloscope display with long persistence phosphor were transformed to the x,y Cartesian coordinates of the horizontal and vertical deflection in TV camera feeding a synchronized TV display. It and subsequent scan converters also used to convert diagnostic ultrasound and sonar signals to TV images mechanized the coordinate transformation matrix called the Jacobian in Calculus texts.
Generally, when higher resolution ultrasound or radar indicators or TV rasters eg. 1225 lines EIA-RS-343 are scan converted to standard 525 lines EIA-RS-170, 330 severe Moire patterns form by the beat-frequency between the horizontal line frequencies if the readout beam was not sufficiently defocussed to span several input scan lines. Preferably an anti-Moire digital filter or dither analogous to analog “wobble” signal can modulate the scan converter input PPI deflection as a function of rho, theta to widen the spokes as it were near the rim when nearly parallel to horizontal scan lines readout.
A patent in the early 1970's granted to Don Dudley of Dataplex Inc. explained how 1225 line HDTV could be broadcast in place of redundant fields via standard 525 line TV. In principle, that is what HDTV does today in transmitting the differences between fields with more robust algorithms for removal of redundancy subject to acceptable rates of distortion and the empirical 70% Kell factor or actually 2/pi=64% modulation transfer function (MTF) at Nyquist sample limit.
Another early scan converter involved the simplistic reduction of 625 TV lines 25 frames/second in Europe to 525 TV lines 30 frames/second in USA by cropping off 100 lines, including at times the forehead of the televised person. Subsequently, instead of cropping 50 lines from the top and bottom, 4 of every 25 lines were dropped out or “decimated” since 625/525=25/21. Preferably, as DTV FSC demonstrated in 1985, for each and every one of 21 readout lines falling between 2 of 25 lines weighting factors proportional to their separations enabled the interpolation of video values between the 625 lines and smoother decimation to 525 than simplistic drop outs. Likewise for example, 720p*2/3=1080i*4/9=480.
In addition to spatial artifacts of aliasing from subsampling and of contouring from quantization in digital scan conversion, the different frame rates created temporal problems with moving images analogous to the stroboscopic effect of backward wagon wheels in sampling 25-30 frames/second. The modern solution by Silicon Graphics et al. is known as “morphing” is disadvantageous since its temporal interpolation/decimation between fields would require brute-force RAM or excessive software “bloatware” for MPEG-2 decoding.
Before digital random access memories (RAM) became inexpensive and commonplace, instead of a TV camera tube scanning one CRT picture and driving another CRT, Texas Instruments, Tektronix, Hughes Image Devices and other companies produced scan converter tubes with electronic input (write) and output (read) video whose associated horizontal and vertical deflection coils were independent in so called “double-ended” tubes simultaneous read and write. They were time-shared in cheaper “single-ended” tubes as
Desir Jean W.
Gottlieb Rackman & Reisman P.C.
LandOfFree
Versatile video transformation device does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Versatile video transformation device, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Versatile video transformation device will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2933354