Surgery: light – thermal – and electrical application – Light – thermal – and electrical application – Electrical therapeutic systems
Reexamination Certificate
2007-05-25
2011-10-04
Rayno, Carl H. (Department: 3766)
Surgery: light, thermal, and electrical application
Light, thermal, and electrical application
Electrical therapeutic systems
C607S008000, C607S028000
Reexamination Certificate
active
08032213
ABSTRACT:
Systems and methods are provided for estimating a patient's ventricular defibrillation threshold (VDFT). Stimulation pulses, which are of at least three different energy levels up to 2 Joules, are delivered to the patient's right ventricle during a window defined between an R-wave and a vulnerable period that follows the R-wave. Voltage potentials, induced in response to the delivered RV stimulation pulses, are measured at a location of the patient's left ventricle (LV) where it is predicted that potential gradients induced in response to RV stimulation pulses will be lowest. Potential gradients are computed using the measured voltage potentials. The patient's VDFT can then be estimated by estimating, based on the computed potential gradients, the RV stimulation energy level that would be required to achieve a minimum acceptable potential gradient at the location of the patient's LV where it is predicted that potential gradients induced in response to RV stimulation pulses will be lowest.
REFERENCES:
patent: 5851220 (1998-12-01), Murphy
patent: 6415179 (2002-07-01), Pendekanti et al.
patent: 6859664 (2005-02-01), Daum et al.
patent: 6889077 (2005-05-01), Bornzin et al.
patent: 6904314 (2005-06-01), Brewer et al.
patent: 2002/0133206 (2002-09-01), Daum et al.
patent: 2008/0249581 (2008-10-01), Wei
Zhou et al., “Epicardial mapping of ventricular defibrillation with monophasic and biphasic shocks in dogs,” Circ Res vol. 72, No. 1, Jan. 1993, pp. 145-160.
Idriss et al., “Predicting the potential gradient field in ventricular fibrillation from shocks delivered in paced rhythm,” Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 268, 1995, pp. H2336-H2344.
Russo et al., “Defibrillation threshold testing: Is it really necessary at the time of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator insertion?” Heart Rhythm, vol. 2, No. 5, May 2005, pp. 456-461.
Chen et al., “the potential gradient field crated by epicardial defibrillation electrodes in dogs,” Circulation, vol. 34, No. 3, Sep. 1986, pp. 626-636.
Macanu et al., “A comparison of biventricular and conventional transvenous defibrillation: A computation study using patient derived models,” Pace, vol. 27, May 2004, pp. 586-593.
Pires et al., “intraoperative testing of the implantable cardioverter-defibrillator: How much is enough?,” J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, vol. 17, No. 2, Feb. 2006, pp. 140-145.
Sun et al., “DFT test via pacing measurements without VF induction and shocking,” Abstract, Pace, vol. 23, p. 611.
Farazi Taraneh Ghaffari
Qu Fujian
Heller Tammie K
Mitchell Steven M.
Pacesetter Inc.
Rayno Carl H.
LandOfFree
Ventricular defibrillation threshold estimation does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Ventricular defibrillation threshold estimation, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Ventricular defibrillation threshold estimation will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-4287339