Vehicle sensing based pre-crash threat assessment system

Data processing: vehicles – navigation – and relative location – Vehicle control – guidance – operation – or indication – Vehicle subsystem or accessory control

Reexamination Certificate

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

C701S301000, C340S903000, C280S735000, C180S274000

Reexamination Certificate

active

06819991

ABSTRACT:

RELATED APPLICATIONS
This application relates to application file number 201-0259 entitled “Remote Sensing Based Pre-Crash Threat Assessment System,” which is filed simultaneously herewith and incorporated by reference herein.
TECHNICAL FIELD
The present invention relates generally to crash detection systems for automotive vehicles, and more particularly to a pre-crash threat assessment system for a crash detection system.
BACKGROUND ART
Due to the current density of traffic on the roads, motor vehicle operators are flooded with information. Consequently, operating a motor vehicle is a complex procedure in which various situations arise where the operator has limited, little, or no time to react or to manually engage safety measures.
Many previously known crash detection systems have incorporated crash detection algorithms based on sensed data. The application of remote sensing systems using radar, lidar, and vision based technologies for object detection, tracking, alarm processing, and potential safety countermeasure activation is well known in the art.
Based on range and bearing information provided by radar, lidar or vision based sensing systems and additional information obtained from the host vehicle sensors, various algorithms have been used to track the paths of host and target vehicles. Algorithms have also been incorporated to estimate the future position of obstacles or vehicles in the host vehicle path.
Safety systems, such as airbags and safety belt pre-tensioners, activate after physical contact occurs between two vehicles. A typical accident occurs within 90 ms, whereas a typical airbag deploys within approximately 70 ms. A typical motorized belt pretensioner requires about 200 ms to reduce the slack in the belt system. Through accident prediction, additional time for safety system activation is generated.
Currently, accident prediction algorithms are employed primarily for accident warning and avoidance and therefore typically cover ranges up to a few hundred meters ahead of the host vehicle. However, in unavoidable collision situations, the range under consideration is substantially short. Therefore, damage minimization techniques must predict an unavoidable collision and deploy safety measures within a short time.
The limitations associated with current accident damage minimization techniques have made it apparent that a new technique to minimize collision damage is needed. The new technique should predict a target vehicle position with respect to a host vehicle and should also substantially minimize the time between an anticipated unavoidable collision detection and subsequent activation of safety devices. The present invention is directed to these ends.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The present invention provides a remote, non-contact sensing based pre-crash threat assessment system. The present invention also provides a non-contact sensor-based pre-crash threat assessment system for an automobile.
In accordance with the present invention, a pre-crash assessment system, which includes a host vehicle in motion, is disclosed. A remote sensor (or sensing system), that detects a first target object dynamics, is coupled to the host object. Status monitoring sensors, that detect host object dynamics, are also coupled to the host object. A first safety device actuator, also coupled to the host object, activates a first safety device when a potential for crash is established such that a crash between the host object and the first target object is unavoidable. A first threshold for the first safety device actuator is defined by first safety device actuation criteria.
A safety device controller, which is coupled to the host object, generates tracking signals based on the host object dynamics and the first target object dynamics. The controller also estimates future positions of the host object and the first target object. The controller further estimates whether the potential for crash between the host object and the first target object is within the first threshold for the first safety device actuator. The safety device controller further controls the first safety device actuator based on the first threshold criteria and other safety device specific actuation criteria.
Advantages of the current invention are that remote sensing position and bearing information of a target object in the near vicinity of the host vehicle are used and threat assessment is made through a fast, robust and reliable algorithm. Fast algorithms allow more decision making time on the part of vehicle controllers and more deployment time for safety devices and are therefore preferable.
Additional advantages and features of the present invention will become apparent from the description that follows and may be realized by the instrumentalities and combinations particularly pointed out in the appended claims, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.


REFERENCES:
patent: 3514610 (1970-05-01), Huston et al.
patent: 4257703 (1981-03-01), Goodrich
patent: 4381829 (1983-05-01), Montaron
patent: 4623966 (1986-11-01), O'Sullivan
patent: 4638289 (1987-01-01), Zottnik
patent: 4673937 (1987-06-01), Davis
patent: 4833469 (1989-05-01), David
patent: 4916450 (1990-04-01), Davis
patent: 4969103 (1990-11-01), Maekawa
patent: 4992943 (1991-02-01), McCracken
patent: 4994972 (1991-02-01), Diller
patent: 5040118 (1991-08-01), Diller
patent: 5063603 (1991-11-01), Burt
patent: 5091726 (1992-02-01), Shyu
patent: 5162794 (1992-11-01), Seith
patent: 5166881 (1992-11-01), Akasu
patent: 5173859 (1992-12-01), Deering
patent: 5182459 (1993-01-01), Okano et al.
patent: 5230400 (1993-07-01), Kakinami et al.
patent: 5234071 (1993-08-01), Kajiwara
patent: 5249157 (1993-09-01), Taylor
patent: 5307136 (1994-04-01), Saniyoshi
patent: 5314037 (1994-05-01), Shaw et al.
patent: 5430432 (1995-07-01), Camhi et al.
patent: 5467283 (1995-11-01), Butsuen et al.
patent: 5479173 (1995-12-01), Yoshioka et al.
patent: 5502432 (1996-03-01), Ohmamyuda et al.
patent: 5521580 (1996-05-01), Kaneko et al.
patent: 5526269 (1996-06-01), Ishibashi et al.
patent: 5534870 (1996-07-01), Avignon et al.
patent: 5541590 (1996-07-01), Nishio
patent: 5552986 (1996-09-01), Omura et al.
patent: 5572428 (1996-11-01), Ishida et al.
patent: 5574463 (1996-11-01), Shirai et al.
patent: 5594414 (1997-01-01), Namngani
patent: 5602760 (1997-02-01), Chacon et al.
patent: 5604683 (1997-02-01), Roecker
patent: 5629847 (1997-05-01), Shirakawa et al.
patent: 5635922 (1997-06-01), Cho et al.
patent: 5646612 (1997-07-01), Byon
patent: 5680097 (1997-10-01), Uemura et al.
patent: 5684474 (1997-11-01), Gilon et al.
patent: 5689264 (1997-11-01), Ishikawa et al.
patent: 5699040 (1997-12-01), Matsuda
patent: 5699057 (1997-12-01), Ikeda et al.
patent: 5710565 (1998-01-01), Shirai et al.
patent: 5745870 (1998-04-01), Yamamoto et al.
patent: 5748477 (1998-05-01), Katoh
patent: 5749426 (1998-05-01), Gilling
patent: 5751211 (1998-05-01), Shirai et al.
patent: 5751836 (1998-05-01), Wildes et al.
patent: 5754099 (1998-05-01), Nishimura et al.
patent: 5771481 (1998-06-01), Gilling
patent: 5779264 (1998-07-01), Demesseman et al.
patent: 5808561 (1998-09-01), Kinoshita et al.
patent: 5815093 (1998-09-01), Kikinis
patent: 5835007 (1998-11-01), Kosiak
patent: 5835873 (1998-11-01), Darby et al.
patent: 5838228 (1998-11-01), Clark
patent: 5847472 (1998-12-01), Byon
patent: 5847755 (1998-12-01), Wixson et al.
patent: 5872536 (1999-02-01), Lyons et al.
patent: 5905457 (1999-05-01), Rashid
patent: 5906393 (1999-05-01), Mazur et al.
patent: 5920345 (1999-07-01), Sauer
patent: 5926126 (1999-07-01), Engelman
patent: 5936549 (1999-08-01), Tsuchiya
patent: 5938714 (1999-08-01), Satonaka
patent: 5948026 (1999-09-01), Beemer, II. et al.
patent: 5949366 (1999-09-01), Herrmann
patent: 5949918 (1999-09-01), McCaffrey
patent: 5955967 (1999-09-01), Yamada
patent: 5959552 (1999-09-01), Cho
patent: 5963272 (1999-10-01), Wixson
patent: 5964822 (1999-10-01), Alland et al.
patent: 5983161 (1999-11-01), Lemelson et al.
patent: 5995037 (1999-11-01), Matsuda et al.
patent: 5999117 (1999-12-01), Engel
pat

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Vehicle sensing based pre-crash threat assessment system does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Vehicle sensing based pre-crash threat assessment system, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Vehicle sensing based pre-crash threat assessment system will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3343290

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.