Land vehicles – Wheeled – Attachment
Reexamination Certificate
2000-08-16
2003-02-18
Dickson, Paul N. (Department: 3619)
Land vehicles
Wheeled
Attachment
C297S452270, C297S452550
Reexamination Certificate
active
06520541
ABSTRACT:
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates generally to vehicle safety equipment, and, in particular, to safety equipment protecting occupants of a vehicle from injury during a wheels-first crash.
The purpose of occupant restraint systems in motor vehicles is the protection of occupants to increase their survival probability during crash impact of the vehicles. Occupant restraint systems perform three basic functions in order to achieve this: the prevention of occupant ejection from the vehicle, the prevention or minimization of the effects of secondary collisions such as impacts with interior vehicular structures and the control of the crash forces applied to the occupant. Known occupant restraint devices such as three-point lap and shoulder harnesses which perform these functions have been widely researched and improved over the years, thereby significantly increasing automotive safety.
However, attention to the seating portion of automotive restraint systems has not been as extensive. One concern in the area of the seating portion of these systems is that the design of many contemporary automotive seat bottoms have compliant characteristics during vertical loading, +Gz, wherein +Gz is understood to be the upward spinal loading for human occupants of the seats of the type which may occur when an automobile becomes airborne and then lands wheels first. Compliant seating characteristics tend to produce excessive occupant displacements during impulsive loading thereby exposing the occupant to structural strike hazards and offering little management of the crash impact energy.
Hodgson, V. R., Vissner, H. R. and Patrick, I. M., “Response of the Seated Human Cadaver to Acceleration and Jerk With and Without Seat Cushions”, The Journal of the Human Factors Society, 1963, disclosed a study with human cadavers during vertical loading. The study concluded that the dynamic load factor, or dynamic overshoot, was increased by all types of cushions used in the tests. The report also concluded that the use of a soft cushion which bottoms during an impulsive force causes more overshoot than the use of no cushion at all. However, soft cushions continue to be used because of perceived occupant comfort in prior art automotive seat cushion technology.
Military technologists have expended considerable effort researching the problem of +Gz exposure, both in the ejection seat and crash-resistant seat areas. This +Gz force vector is an important factor in many occupant survival considerations in military vehicles. For example, helicopter occupants experience significant +Gz acceleration during crashes and hard landings. Ejection seat occupants also experience significant +Gz accelerations as the seat is rapidly propelled from the aircraft.
Military experiments on ejection and helicopter seats have demonstrated that a contoured non-compressible seat pan covered with a rate-dependent foam cushion provides reasonable occupant response by minimizing displacement of the occupant under load. Displacement controlling seat bottoms define occupant kinematics in a predictable manner. This enables designers to identify potential structural strike hazards and to protect the seat occupant from them. This type of seat bottom prevents occupant response from exhibiting excessive dynamic overshoot but may lack the comfort typically required in automobile applications.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,553,924 to Cantor, et al. disclosed a Vehicle Safety Seat System where a metal seat bottom is covered with a comfort foam layer. A rate-dependent foam layer is then disposed above the comfort foam layer. Although this design provided injury protection for the occupant, the design lacked the comfort required in automobile applications.
Human tolerance to +Gz loading may be expressed in terms of both amplitude and time duration. This loading data is commonly reported as Eiband Curves. Using this method of characterization a level of 23 G over approximately a time duration of 5.5 milliseconds has been identified as a critical transition point for the threshold injury region for the human spine. See, for example, Eiband, A. Martin, 1959, Human Tolerance to Rapidly Applied Accelerations: A Summary of the Literature, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Washington. Subsequent investigation by military researchers in the development of ejection seat designs essentially substantiated the data published by Eiband.
However, it is generally accepted that these tolerance values are based on healthy young males who are ideally positioned with the mid-axillary line of the spine parallel to the acceleration vector. Researchers agree that departure from ideal prepositioning or ideal physiology of the seated occupant tends to lower the ability of the spine to tolerate +Gz loading without serious injury.
Consequently, occupant characteristics such as age, sex, bone strength, and initial position all in influence occupant response to impulsive acceleration loading. These factors may increase the likelihood of serious spinal injury even at force levels substantially below the 23 G level set forth by Eiband. As a result of these variables researchers have attempted to define a risk regime of +Gz exposures where extreme caution must be taken to avoid spinal injuries.
Standard military protocol for testing human subjects to +Gz generally permits initial exposure at a safe level of 6 G for training and indoctrination purposes. Acceleration is then gradually increased in 1 G to 2 G increments, using the 8 G through 10 G levels to study kinematic motions. Higher levels, for example, 12 G and beyond, define the risk range. In this protocol, exposure to this risk range is undertaken only after careful analysis of occupant response to accelerations in the safe range
The close relationship between the safe range and the risk range on the +Gz axis has necessitated careful control of dynamic overshoot within military seating systems in order to prevent avoidable and unnecessary increase of exposure in the risk range. This principle is directly applicable to all vehicles that experience a +Gz acceleration.
Automobile seat designers typically use several different seat bottom design approaches which are very different from the military approach. Some automobile seats contain varied thicknesses of padding material integrated with an array of springs and positioned over an open space within a seat cushion frame. Other designs use thick layers of similar padding material mounted within a rigid seat bottom structure. Still other designs use a hybrid of cushion foams and structures in forming the automotive seat.
It is well known in the field of vehicle safety to provide seat belt restraints for occupants of automobile seats. It is also well known to provide pretensioner devices for eliminating slack in seat belt restraint in order to ideally position occupants including coupling the occupants of the seats with the seat cushions. Conventional pretensioners operate by using well known sensing devices which sense a crash using crash sensors.
It is an object of the present invention to provide a vehicle safety seat system that protects an occupant from upward force along the spinal column during a wheels-first crash and affords the occupant substantial comfort during normal operation of the vehicle.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The present invention comprises an automobile safety seat system which has been designed to provide both protection from upward force along the spinal column of an occupant of the seat and comfort to the occupant. This kind of force that the seat protects against is that which is applied to an occupant in a wheels-first automobile crash such as a crash into a ditch. The seat bottom of the safety seat system includes an angled metal seat bottom.
The seat bottom of the present invention provides an angled metal undersurface which is covered with rate-dependent energy absorbing foam. The angled metal undersurface includes a definitive anti-submarining ramp for reaction of the
Dickson Paul N.
Penn State Research Foundation
Reed Smith LLP
To Toan C
LandOfFree
Vehicle safety seat system does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Vehicle safety seat system, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Vehicle safety seat system will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3173852