Surgery – Diagnostic testing – Touch or pain response of skin
Reexamination Certificate
2000-01-28
2001-05-22
O'Connor, Cary (Department: 3736)
Surgery
Diagnostic testing
Touch or pain response of skin
C600S587000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06234977
ABSTRACT:
TECHNICAL FIELD OF INVENTION
The present invention relates to a monofilament sensory device which is capable of delivering several pre-calibrated forces and to methods of making and using same. More particularly, the present invention relates to a new and improved sensory cutaneous nerve function evaluation device and to methods for testing the peripheral nerve sensory function. The device includes a filament which is pressed against the body surface of a subject at various preselected and calibrated pressures and measures the sensory nerve function of that subject by the subject's perceived recognition of the pressure applied by the filament.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to a device designed to test the sensory nerve function of a patient who is suspected of having or has had sensory nerve damage and to compare the results to data obtained from normal, healthy subjects. Such sensory dysfunction is known to occur due to (1) trauma affecting the continuity of nerve fibers, (2) disease processes including leprosy, diabetes, multiple sclerosis, and (3) other diseases resulting in diminished nerve conductivity; and nerve compression syndromes. The data gained from evaluation with said monofilaments provides an indication of the degree to which nerve damage has progressed and/or the degree to which recovery has occurred. Data thus obtained can be used to determine appropriate medical and/or surgical treatments to alleviate nerve compression or other causes of interference. Data can also be utilized in assessing the success of therapies and therapeutic modalities directed towards aiding in the restoration of nerve function or adaptation to nerve dysfunction. The readings provide an indication of the degree of damage to the patient's sensory nerves and/or a measure of recovery from damage to the patient's sensory nerves.
Filament testing has long been used as a sensitive monitoring means for evaluation peripheral nerve function of a patient. In the 1800's, the focus of peripheral nerve testing of the hands was carried out in a study of normal physiology using horse hairs as the filaments. In the late 1950's, it was determined that a broader range of filament forces were needed than those available with horse hairs to refine the filament method for peripheral nerve testing. Thus, J. Semmes and S. Weinstein developed and published results of testing cutaneous sensory perception using nylon monofilament rods of varied diameters and consistent tips and further published methods of using those rods to apply force. The nylon filaments were affixed to plastic rods (or “filament handles”) which were cut to the approximate length of a pencil for ease of handling and comfortable fit in the therapist's hand. The devices were known as “aesthiometers”. The advantage of these new filaments, when affixed to a plastic rod, was their ease of handling and their ability to create a range of testing values by varying the diameter of the filament affixed to a rod. These monofilaments attached to plastic rods with glue, came to be know as “Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments” and became the standard means for repeatable testing and measurement of the threshold of cutaneous sensory perception.
The standard Semmes-Weinstein approach suffered from the fact that it required a set of twenty (20) different monofilament rods of varied diameters in order to provide an effective diagnostic technique. Each nylon monofilament was about 38 mm in length and had diameters selected to correspond to Log (10×force in mg) of forces ranging from 4 mg (the lowest) to 447 grams (the highest). Furthermore, virtually all Semmes-Weinstein devices employed nylon monofilaments and, nylon was found to suffer from certain drawbacks which reduced the overall efficiency of the cutaneous sensory perception-measuring device.
The proper force for determining the patient's sensory perception is obtained at the moment the monofilament bends. The fragile nature of the nylon filament requires that it be carefully handled and stored. If the monofilament is misused or mishandled, a non-elastic deformation or kink can occur. Once such a kink occurs, the standard predictable moment of force required to form a uniform bend in order to make a peripheral nerve function determination is lost. Also, properties of nylon are subject to change with climatic changes which further reduces the predictability of the force required to cause the nylon monofilament to bend. Still another impediment, as stated above, is that the diagnostician, in order to perform a complete diagnosis, using the Semmes-Weinstein approach, had to carry twenty (20) monofilaments of varying diameters at all times.
A variety of handle designs have been considered the past decades in an attempt to provide a more convenient evaluation device. These designs include a single handle having five (5) monofilaments attached thereto and radiating therefrom and which rotate on the handle by means of a screw which tightens and loosens the monofilament rack on the handle (See: U.S. Pat. No. 5,381,806, Weinstein, et al.) This design was awkward to use when attempting to apply force against those areas of skin which may be difficult to reach such as the palm of a hand when that hand is held in a fist position or any other body parts that may be contracted in abnormal postures because, in attempting to contact the skin with only one point of a single filament, contact is often made by the non-selected filaments with adjacent body parts thereby negating the single stimulus response of the patient. These multi-filament handles also used nylon filaments which have the disadvantages noted above and additionally, requires that the entire set be replaced when even a single monofilament becomes unusable because of deformation or failure.
More recently, the use of alternative filament materials such as steel, were employed in the belief that they would enhance the accuracy of pressure aesthiometers by providing a force which is consistent over time and which is capable of providing a consistent footprint of area of stimulus. The steel wire pressure aesthesiometer presented by Kanatani in U.S. Pat. No. 4,313,446 provided an instrument purportedly capable of delivering such variable forces but had the distinct disadvantage of utilizing an exposed filament which was subject to deformation if not properly stored, and which required the interchange of filaments of varying diameters to provide for a full range of testing. Furthermore, steel has limited elastic properties and therefore is subject to inelastic bending. In such cases, the accuracy of force delivery is compromised resulting in a deviation from known clinical protocols.
The Kanatani design further required a deflection gauge upon which the diagnostician had to rely in order to achieve the desired range of filament deflection required to apply a promised force in grams of pressures. From the table given in
FIG. 9
of the Kanatani patent (U.S. Pat. No. 4,313,446), it can be seen that in the smaller diameter filaments, a variance in deflection as small as 2.5 mm results in a 175% increase in the stress applied as measured in grams per square millimeter and a deflection variance of 10 mm will result in a 235% increase in the stress applied as measured in grams per square millimeter.
Thus, a major clinical disadvantage of the design proposed by Kanatani is that an evaluator must be ever alert to the area being tested and to the graph attached to the instrument indicating the degree of deflection. Tests of cutaneous sensory perception require care and precision to perform accurately and attention to the area of applied force is required particularly with persons who have known sensory dysfunction. Alteration of sympathetic function including sudomotor, vasomotor and pilomotor function, often result in trophic changes in affected areas. The result of these trophic changes may include loss of sweat patterns and skin dryness due to loss of the normal nutritive process of the skin. Skin may be
Marmor II Charles
O'Connor Cary
Wittenberg Malcolm B.
LandOfFree
Variable-force monofilament sensory device and methods of... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Variable-force monofilament sensory device and methods of..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Variable-force monofilament sensory device and methods of... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2438043