Baths – closets – sinks – and spittoons – Debris catcher for a flush closet or clean out plug
Reexamination Certificate
2000-11-10
2003-12-30
Phillips, Charles E. (Department: 3751)
Baths, closets, sinks, and spittoons
Debris catcher for a flush closet or clean out plug
C004S255010
Reexamination Certificate
active
06668389
ABSTRACT:
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
The invention relates to a vacuum toilet, as is used, for example, in aircraft and in railway carriages, having a toilet bowl and a vacuum pipeline which opens out into said toilet bowl.
During operation of such vacuum toilets, it is often the case that passengers drop foreign bodies, such as powder compacts, cosmetics articles, combs, spectacles, and the like, into the toilet bowl. Once the vacuum flushing has been initiated, these objects are carried away by suction and may result in blockages in the toilet pipe system, which may adversely affect, or prevent altogether, the continued operation of the vacuum flushing. Such an operational breakdown can often only be rectified by the pipeline system being removed in part in order for the foreign body to be found. This is time-consuming and costly and usually cannot be carried out during the flight or journey, which may result in lengthy and thus disruptive breakdown times. The blockage of the vacuum system by foreign bodies is often all the more serious since it is usually the case that a number of toilets are connected to a single vacuum system, for which reason a number of toilets are put out of action at the same time by a single foreign body.
BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
An object of the invention is to avoid long-term blockages of such a vacuum system by foreign bodies. This object is achieved in that, in the region of the opening of the vacuum pipeline into the toilet bowl, the vacuum pipeline has a cross-sectional narrowing in the form of a foreign-body barrier which projects radially into the line interior. An alternative embodiment of the invention provides an insert pipe part which can be inserted into the vacuum pipeline in the region of the opening, the insert part having a cross-sectional narrowing in the form of a foreign-body barrier which projects radially into the pipe interior.
First of all, the following will better explain and define some of the terms which are essential to an understanding of the invention. The term “pipeline” or “pipe part”, rather than being restricted to lines of round cross section, covers all conceivable shapes and cross sections (e.g., oval or elliptical) and also covers pipeline arrangements which have different shaping and different dimensions in certain areas. The radial direction is the direction predetermined by the gradient of the flow speed. It is thus oriented perpendicularly to the flow direction and in the direction of the geometrical pipe central axis.
The term “flow” relates, in this context, to the flushing fluid which is carried away by suction. The alignment of the foreign-body barrier in the radially inward direction also covers those embodiments which, in addition to the radial component, also have a component in the flow direction or a cross-sectionally tangential component, and which are thus oriented axially or laterally obliquely in the inward direction.
The term “cross-sectional narrowing” relates to the diameter of cylindrical bodies which can still just pass freely through the pipeline. For example, with a line diameter of 50 mm, a cross-sectional narrowing of 20% means that cylindrical elements with a diameter of 40 mm can still pass the foreign-body barrier freely, while those with diameters larger than 40 mm remain caught on the foreign-body barrier. The cross-sectional narrowing should be distinguished from a reduction in the cross-sectional area of the pipeline. In the example mentioned, the 20% cross-sectional narrowing could be brought about by a thin inwardly projecting bar of 10 mm in length, although this would barely reduce the free cross-sectional area.
As a result of the cross-sectional narrowing according to the invention, any foreign bodies which have passed into the toilet bowl and, on account of their dimensions, would be sucked into the vacuum system without obstruction, if there were no foreign-body barrier, remain caught on the foreign-body barrier. The foreign-body barrier has to be sufficiently rigid in order to be able to withstand impact and contact pressure exerted by foreign bodies. Arranging the foreign-body barrier in the region of the opening of the vacuum line into the toilet bowl ensures that the foreign bodies are intercepted directly in the region of the opening and, in any case, only a single toilet is affected. Furthermore, this region is easily accessible from the outside, with the result that a foreign body remaining caught on the foreign-body barrier can be removed again very quickly, as a result of which lengthy breakdown times are avoided.
By virtue of a foreign-body barrier which projects radially into the line interior, correct normal operation of the vacuum toilet, in contrast, for example, to a lattice-like barrier, is not obstructed since the feces material is compressible and is carried away past the foreign-body barrier by suction-possibly being compressed in the process. Should, in exceptional cases, the foreign-body barrier be blocked by feces, then, by virtue of the foreign-body barrier being arranged in the region of the opening of the vacuum pipeline, the blockage, in any case, is easily accessible and can be released quickly, for example with the aid of a customarily provided cleaning brush.
Within the context of the invention, the foreign-body barrier is arranged in the region of the opening of the vacuum pipeline, whereby a foreign body which remains caught on the barrier can be removed again, by way of the opening of the vacuum pipeline in the toilet bowl, without the pipeline system having to be dismantled for this purpose. If appropriate, it is also possible for the insert pipe part to be removed, together with the foreign body held fast therein, cleaned and reinserted.
An insert pipe part according to the invention, which is insertable into the vacuum pipeline and has a cross-sectional narrowing in the form of a foreign-body barrier projecting radially into the pipe interior, makes it possible for existing vacuum toilets in aircraft and railway carriages to be retrofitted without additional structural changes to the toilets themselves. In this case, the foreign-body barrier is arranged in the tubular insert part, which can be inserted into the vacuum pipeline in the region of the opening of the same into the toilet bowl. If appropriate, locking may be provided between the insert pipe part and vacuum line.
The foreign-body barrier is preferably configured such that the cross-sectional narrowing brought about by it is more than 10%, preferably more than 20%, more preferably approximately 30%, of the line diameter. The preferred radial narrowing of 30% of the line diameter is based on the fact, on the one hand, that the narrowing has to be of a sufficient size in order to be as effective as possible in keeping out foreign bodies of different sizes and, on the other hand, that the foreign-body barrier must not project radially inwards to too great an extent, since otherwise the risk of blockage during correct operation increases.
In a preferred embodiment, the cross-sectional narrowing which is brought about by the foreign-body barrier is adapted approximately to the smallest clear cross section of the rest of the pipeline system. If there are narrowed locations in the rest of the pipeline system (for example upstream of the feces tank) which could be blocked by cylindrical bodies with a cross-sectional diameter greater than d, then the maximum radial narrowing of the foreign-body barrier is to be accordingly dimensioned such that it cannot have cylinders with diameter d passing it any longer. This means, on the one hand, that objects which can pass the foreign-body barrier can also pass reliably through the rest of the pipeline system; at the same time, the maximum radial narrowing is no larger than necessary, in order for correct operation not to be threatened by blockages. This embodiment is preferred, in particular, when the internal diameter of the vacuum lines decreases, for example in the direction of the feces tank, rather than being constant over the entire pipeline s
Dittmar Thomas
Steinmetz Uwe-Michael
Steinmüller Karlheinz
Zang Steffen
Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld L.L.P.
Lufthansa Technik AG
Phillips Charles E.
LandOfFree
Vacuum toilet does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Vacuum toilet, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Vacuum toilet will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3097064