Drug – bio-affecting and body treating compositions – Lymphokine – Interleukin
Reexamination Certificate
1998-10-08
2004-04-06
Caputa, Anthony C. (Department: 1642)
Drug, bio-affecting and body treating compositions
Lymphokine
Interleukin
C424S085100, C424S093700, C424S093710, C424S184100, C424S185100, C424S204100, C424S265100, C424S277100, C424S278100, C514S002600, C530S351000, C530S300000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06716422
ABSTRACT:
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates generally to the fields of immunotherapy, oncology and infectious disease control. More particularly, it concerns novel methods of treating infectious diseases and cancers, in particular melanomas, with a combinatorial adjuvant or adjuvants in such a manner that an unexpectedly strong immune response directed against the diseases or melanomas is induced without the deleterious side effects that have been previously observed with standard chemotherapy.
2. Description of Related Art
Melanoma is a cancer of the pigmented cell of the skin, the melanocyte. Patients with metastatic (Stage IV) malignant melanoma have a median survival of approximately one year (Balch et al., 1993; Koh, 1991). Current standard treatment consists of combination chemotherapy with agents such as cisplatin, DTIC, and BCNU, with or without cytokines such as interleukin-2 (IL-2) or interferon-&agr; (IFN-&agr;) (Balch et al., 1993; Koh, 1991; Legha and Buzaid, 1993). Response rates to chemotherapy have been reported to be as high as 60%, yet only approximately 5% of patients experience long term survival, regardless of the therapeutic regimen employed. Clearly, new approaches to the treatment of metastatic melanoma are needed.
Conventional chemotherapy aims to control the growth of cancer by targeting rapidly growing cells. However, this function is not specific, as many normal cells, such as those of the bone marrow and the intestinal epithelium, also have a basal level of proliferation. Therefore, many normal cells of the body also are susceptible to the toxic effects of chemotherapy, and conventional chemotherapy can impart a substantial degree of morbidity to the patient.
The attractiveness of immunotherapy is its specificity. If antigens were expressed on the tumor cells that were not expressed by normal cells of the host, then specific cytolytic T lymphocytes (CTL) could theoretically be activated to selectively kill the tumor cells while sparing the normal tissues of the patient. To this end, considerable effort has been made in the last decade to identify such tumor-specific antigens which may serve as targets for specific tumor cell killing (Boon et al., 1994; Boon et al., 1995).
Initial approaches to the immunotherapy of cancer have met with limited success. Vaccinations with irradiated tumor cells, with or without adjuvants, have generated response rates of 10-20% (Berd et al., 1990). Non-specific immune potentiators such as Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) also have given low but detectable response rates (Eilber et al., 1976). Treatment of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma with the T cell growth factor IL-2 has resulted in response rates of 15-20%, with several percent of patients experiencing a significant long-term survival (Hawkins, 1996). Similarly, the addition of IL-2 to standard chemotherapy for metastatic melanoma may result in increased response rates (Eilber et al., 1976). Collectively, these observations support the concept that immune manipulation has the potential to benefit patients with certain types of cancer, but clearly indicate that the current approaches are suboptimal. One hypothesis to explain the low overall response rates to these therapies is that the approaches up to now have aimed to amplify an immune response that has already been initiated by the host. In fact, the fundamental problem may be that most patients do not appropriately initiate an anti-tumor immune response at all. Further, tumor antigen-specific immunization will require induction of cytolytic T cell activity, and little is known regarding the optimal method of achieving this goal.
The molecular characterization of antigens specifically expressed on tumor cells but not on most normal cells of host origin has opened the possibility of tumor-specific vaccination in the immunotherapy of cancer. The last several years have witnessed a rapid expansion in the identification of human tumor antigens and their genes, chiefly in melanoma cell lines, that comprise several distinct categories: 1) point mutations in normal cellular genes; 2) differentiation antigens restricted to the melanocyte lineage; 3) intron sequences that become included in the coding region of a gene; 4) viral gene products; 5) underglycosylated normal gene products; and 6) developmentally regulated, non-mutated genes that. are not normally expressed in most adult tissues (Chen et al., 1993). Immune recognition of these antigens occurs via specific CD8
+
CTL that interact with antigenic peptides bound to a groove in class I MHC (HLA) molecules. Class II MHC-binding epitopes recognized by CD4
−
T cells also have been described.
Under optimal circumstances, initiation of an immune response is triggered by peptide/MHC complexes expressed by host antigen-presenting cells (APC), and additionally requires multiple cofactors provided by APC. Several cell types appear to be capable of serving as “professional” APC, including dendritic cells (DC), activated B cells, and activated macrophages. After initial activation, CTL induced by APC interactions are thought to migrate throughout the host, recognize the same MHC/peptide complex on the tumor cells, and are triggered to kill them. This antigen-specific cytolysis is mediated largely via induction of apoptosis. It is hypothesized that one or several steps along this pathway of T cell activation and target cell recognition may be defective in tumor-bearing individuals.
MAGE-1 was the first human tumor antigen gene to be cloned and characterized (Van der Bruggen et al., 1991). It is expressed by several melanoma cell lines but not by any adult tissues except the testis. Therefore, it falls into category 6 listed above, being a normal gene that is abnormally expressed. MAGE-1 belongs to a family of at least 12 related genes, many of which also are expressed in various tumor cell types (De Plaen et al., 1994). One of these, MAGE-3, has been found to be expressed in approximately two-thirds of all melanoma samples tested. Peptides derived from the MAGE-3 protein have been identified that bind to the grooves of HLA-A1, HLA-A2, and HLA-B44 MHC molecules (Van der Bruggen et al., 1991; Van Pel et al., 1995; Van der Bruggen et al., 1994), and CTL recognizing each of these peptide/HLA combinations also have been observed. HLA-A2 is the most frequently expressed HLA allele in humans, present in about 50% of individuals.
Recently, 12 patients with MAGE-3
+
metastatic melanoma were injected in Europe at monthly intervals with the MAGE-3 peptide that binds to HLA-A1 (Marchand et al., 1995). Either 100 or 300 &mgr;g of peptide was injected in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) at 2 subcutaneous sites distant from any tumor location. There were no major toxicities, and 3 patients experienced mild discomfort from inflammation at tumor locations or lymph nodes. Six patients were well enough to complete 3 monthly injections. Rather surprisingly, 3 of those 6 demonstrated major partial responses, giving an overall response rate of 25%.
Since the identification of the MAGE family, several additional melanoma antigens have been characterized including Melan-A, gp100 and tyrosinase (Old et al., 1996). One of these, Melan-A, is expressed by nearly all melanoma cell lines tested (Coulie et al., 1994), as well as in normal melanocytes. It therefore falls into category 2 above, encoding a melanocyte differentiation antigen. A peptide encoded by Melan-A has been defined that binds to HLA-A2.
Eighteen HLA-A2
+
patients with metastatic melanoma were immunized with a peptide derived from Melan-A emulsified in incomplete Freund's adjuvant (Cormier et al., 1997). No major toxicities were observed, and evidence of immunization was demonstrated in 12 patients. However, no tumor regression responses were seen, indicating that this rather straightforward vaccination strategy was not sufficient to generate a therapeutic effect. Collectively, these results support the general safety of tumor antigen peptides in humans, esp
Fallarino Francesca
Gajewski Thomas F.
ARCH Development Corporation
Caputa Anthony C.
Fulbright & Jaworski L.L.P.
Holleran Anne L.
LandOfFree
Vaccine adjuvants for immunotherapy of melanoma does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Vaccine adjuvants for immunotherapy of melanoma, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Vaccine adjuvants for immunotherapy of melanoma will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3190737