User-centric consent management system and method

Electrical computers and digital processing systems: multicomput – Computer-to-computer session/connection establishing – Network resources access controlling

Reexamination Certificate

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

C709S225000, C726S004000, C726S028000

Reexamination Certificate

active

07076558

ABSTRACT:
In a network computing environment, a user-centric system and method for controlling access to user-specific information maintained in association with a web-services service. When a web-services client desires access to the user-specific information, the client sends a request. The request identifies the reasons/intentions for accessing the desired information. The request is compared to the user's existing access permissions. If there is no existing access permission, the request is compared to the user's default preferences. If the default preferences permit the requested access, an access rule is created dynamically and the client's request is filled, without interrupting the user. If the default preferences do not permit the request to be filled, a consent user interface may be invoked. The consent user interface presents one or more consent options to a party with authority to grant consent, thereby permitting the user to control whether the client's access will be filled.

REFERENCES:
patent: 5163147 (1992-11-01), Orita
patent: 5414852 (1995-05-01), Kramer et al.
patent: 5708780 (1998-01-01), Levergood et al.
patent: 5889952 (1999-03-01), Hunnicutt et al.
patent: 5941947 (1999-08-01), Brown et al.
patent: 5995972 (1999-11-01), Allgeier
patent: 5999711 (1999-12-01), Misra et al.
patent: 6253203 (2001-06-01), O'Flaherty et al.
patent: 6260148 (2001-07-01), Aggarwal et al.
patent: 6269369 (2001-07-01), Robertson
patent: 6275824 (2001-08-01), O'Flaherty et al.
patent: 6308173 (2001-10-01), Glasser et al.
patent: 6482752 (2002-11-01), Yamazaki et al.
patent: 6631361 (2003-10-01), O'Flaherty et al.
patent: 6820204 (2004-11-01), Desai et al.
patent: 2001/0023421 (2001-09-01), Numao et al.
patent: 2001/0042126 (2001-11-01), Wong et al.
patent: 2001/0049620 (2001-12-01), Blasko
patent: 2002/0019828 (2002-02-01), Mortl
patent: 2002/0026345 (2002-02-01), Juels
patent: 2002/0049907 (2002-04-01), Woods et al.
patent: 2002/0096571 (2002-07-01), Bradee
patent: 2002/0099671 (2002-07-01), Mastin Crosbie et al.
patent: 2002/0112171 (2002-08-01), Ginter et al.
patent: 2002/0188572 (2002-12-01), Bleizeffer et al.
patent: 2003/0046576 (2003-03-01), High et al.
patent: 2003/0081781 (2003-05-01), Erickson et al.
patent: 2003/0196094 (2003-10-01), Hillis et al.
patent: 2005/0240622 (2005-10-01), Cheung
The Role of Graph Model and Conflict of Interest, ACM Transactions on Information and System Security, vol. 2, No. 1, Feb. 1999, pp. 3-33 by Matunda Nyanchama and Sylvia Osborn.
The ARBAC97 Model for Role-Based Administration of Roles, ACM Transactions on Information and System Security, vol. 2, No. 1, Feb. 1999, pp. 105-135 by Ravi Sandhu, Venkata Bhamidipati and Qamar Munawer.
Configuring Role-Based Access Control to Enforce Mandatory and Discretionary Access Control Policies, ACM Transactions on Information and System Security, vol. 3, No. 2, May 2000, pp. 85-106 by Sylvia Osborn, Ravi Sandhu and Qamar Munawer.
Role-Based Authorization Constraints Specification, ACM Transactions on Information and System Security, vol. 3, No. 4, Nov. 2000, pp. 207-226 by Gail-Joon Ahn and Ravi Sandhu.
Why UDDI Will Succeed, Quietly; Two Factors Push Web Services Forward, The Stencil Scope, 7 pgs., Apr. 2001 by Brent Sleeper.
The YGuard Access Control Model: Set-Based Access Control, SACMAT'01, May 3-4, 2001, pp. 75-84 by Ty van den Akker, Quinn O. Snell and Mark J. Clement (ACM Press—ISBN 1-58113-350).
Fine Grained Access Control for SOAP E-Services, WWW10, May 1-5, 2001, pp. 504-513 by Ernesto Damiani, Sabrina deCapitani di Vimercati, Stefano Paraboschi, and Pierangela Samarati (ACM Press—ISBN 1-58113-348).
Web Services: High Stakes Amid the Hype, The Washington Post, Oct. 18, 2001, 4 pgs. by Leslie Walker.
W3C Translations—XML in 10 Points, available at www.w3.org/XML/1999/XML-in-10-points, Copyright 1999-2000, 4 pgs., by Bert Bos.
W3C Initiative—P3P and Privacy on the Web FAQ, available at www.w3.org/P3P/p3pfaq.html, last revised Jun. 22, 2001, 11 pgs.
W3C Initiatve—P3P 1.0: A New Standard in Online Privacy, available at www.w3.org/P3P/brochure.html, Copyright 1997-2000, 6 pgs.
W3C—A P3P Preference Exchange Language 1.0(APPEL 1.0)—W3C Working Draft Feb. 26, 2001, available at www.w3.org/TR/P3P-preferences.html, 50 pgs, by Lorrie Cranor, Marc Langheinrich, and Massimo Marchiori.
Web Services Routing Protocol(WS-Routing), dated Oct. 23, 2001, available at http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/en-us/dnglobspec/html/ws-routing.asp, by Henrik F. Nielsen and Satish Thatte.
Newton, “Newton's Telecom Dictionary,” 19th Edition, CMP Books, Mar. 2003, 3 pages, U.S.A.

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

User-centric consent management system and method does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with User-centric consent management system and method, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and User-centric consent management system and method will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3566955

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.