Surgery – Diagnostic testing – Structure of body-contacting electrode or electrode inserted...
Reexamination Certificate
1999-12-14
2002-06-04
Cohen, Lee (Department: 3739)
Surgery
Diagnostic testing
Structure of body-contacting electrode or electrode inserted...
C600S391000, C600S393000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06400977
ABSTRACT:
RELATED APPLICATIONS
U.S. patent application Ser. No. 08/508,928, filed Jul. 28, 1995, for a Disposable Electro-Dermal Device, now abandoned.
U.S. patent application Ser. No. 08/783,721, filed Jan. 16, 1997, for an Electrode Equipped Electro-Dermal Device, now U.S. Pat. No. 3,916,159.
U.S. patent application Ser. No. 08/783,912, filed Jan. 16, 1997, for a Disposable Electrodeless Electro-Dermal Device, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,066,093.
U.S. patent application Ser. No. 08/783,904, filed Jan. 16, 1997, for a Disposable Electro-Dermal Device, now U.S. Pat. No. 3,865,741.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to a multiple electrical sensor positioning device. More particularly, it relates to a universal sensor mask and its method of use with diagnostic medical equipment. More particularly still, the present invention relates to a disposable dermal chest mask for assistance in establishing physical attachment of sensors from electrocardiograph machines to a human chest.
2. Description of the Prior Art
Prior art electrodes for contacting a specific area of the human body for use with diagnostic medical equipment are generally a combination of elements. A signal wire from the analytical apparatus is usually attached to a metallic or otherwise conductive body contact electrode which is attached to the patient's skin at the desired point of contact. The wire and electrode combination are generally referred to as a “lead.” Electrical current generated by the heart in a person's chest flows to the surface and at the skin produces differences in electrical voltage which can be measured between pairs of electrodes placed at two points on the skin. One of the most common tests performed requiring electrode attachment to a patient's body is an electrocardiogram, sometimes alternatively referred to as an ECG. A twelve-lead electrocardiograph provides the most accurate signals for recognizing ischemic electrocardiographic changes.
To administer a resting twelve-lead ECG, it is necessary to apply ten electrodes to various points on the torso and limbs of a patient to measure and analyze cardiac data. Twelve recordings for the ECG are made from nine active lead positions with the tenth being used as a ground. An electrode portion of a lead may in fact consist of an alternative form of sensor, and the terms “electrode” or “sensor” for purposes of this disclosure are interchangeable. A lead wire connecting a sensor to the diagnostic equipment could possibly in fact consist of a radio or an optical signal. Six of the ten electrodes are applied to the patient's chest over prescribed anatomical landmarks. The remaining four electrodes are applied to each of the patient's limbs. The chest electrodes are known as the precordial leads and the limb electrodes are called limb leads. The precordial leads are designated V
1
, V
2
, V
3
, V
4
, V
5
, and V
6
. The limb leads are designated LA, RA, LL, and RL (ground).
It is generally acknowledged that it is critically important to place the precordial leads with precision in order to obtain accurate and repeatable recordings. However, accurate placement and attachment of a large number of leads can be difficult and time consuming and requires knowledge, skill, and diligence on the part of the person attaching the electrodes or sensors. Mechanical problems in attaching multiple leads to a patient range from tangling of lead wires and excessive time consumed in pairing lead wires with the appropriate electrodes, to difficulty in locating anatomical landmarks on a patient with precision.
Problems occur if the leads are not properly placed and are located higher or lower than optimal. The position of the precordial leads is determined by the anatomical features of the patient's chest and not by the position of the heart itself. Research reported in the electrocardiography literature indicates that precordial leads placed one inch or more from their true anatomical landmarks can result in misinterpretation of the patient's ECG. This may result in or contribute to diagnosis errors, false hospital admissions, sending sick people home, or have other negative impacts on diagnosis or treatment. The placement problem is compounded when serial comparisons are made between two or more ECGs taken over time. For example, if V
4
was placed one inch too high for one test and one inch too low for another, the difference of two inches may produce what appears to be a significant difference between the two ECGs when in fact there was no physiological change in the patient's heart condition.
To place the precordial leads accurately requires training in using both visual and palpatory cues to find the anatomical landmarks on each patient. Placement accuracy is also affected by the time and diligence dedicated to placing the precordial electrodes. An experienced and conscientious electrocardiologist may require and devote ten minutes to palpation and ascertaining the exact precordial landmarks. However, in busy clinical environments or emergency situations, medical personnel are often so rushed they may not even palpate the patient. Under those conditions, precordial leads are commonly placed with inadequate palpation and with little attention to a patient's particular anatomy. As a consequence, individual leads are often misplaced by two and as much as three inches from their true anatomical landmarks. In addition, training and maintaining the necessary skill for proper placement of individual leads is time and resource consuming and often not adequate. With six precordial leads, there are six chances to misplace electrodes. Research shows that V
1
and V
2
electrodes are typically placed high and wide of their targets—the fourth intercostal space on each side of the sternum. Likewise, precordial electrodes V
4
, V
5
, and V
6
are most often misplaced low and wide. Electrode V
3
is most often misplaced too low. The most obvious conclusion to be drawn is that lead placement is often not accurate.
After the individual electrodes are positioned on a patient, it is necessary to attach the ten lead wires. Each lead wire is labeled to correspond to one of the anatomical landmarks, i.e., V
1
, V
2
. . . V
6
. . . RL. Should lead wires be crossed, interpretative ECG monitors can detect and alert the operator of a possible crossed lead wire situation, but that requires additional time to check connections and to take corrective action. This is a time consuming operation which increases the risk in an emergency situation. Crossed lead wires are a more significant problem when the ECG monitor does not provide interpretation of the recordings and cannot alert the operator of this possibility. In such a case, the ECG signals for each of the twelve leads are recorded on hard copy to be read at a later time. The physician or technician reading the ECG recordings may recognize the error but by that time the patient has usually been disconnected from the monitor. The present invention reduces or eliminates the chances of either of these situations from occurring.
Periodic electrocardiograms are important for providing a cardiographic profile of a patient for early detection and diagnosis of cardiovascular diseases. In order to provide an accurate profile, it is important not only that the electrocardiogram be taken with sensors affixed accurately, but that the sensors be placed at the same location on the patient in the subsequent exam as for the previous examination. The efficacy and the repeatability of the tests is critical so that a series of ECG results can be compared to provide a continuing profile of a patient's medical history for diagnosis and treatment of heart disease.
In urgent situations, including those electrocardiograms taken with the current standard electrode lead wire system, during an acute symptomatic episode there may only be time to attach two to four individual electrodes to the patient. Therefore, it is desirable to have a device which enables more electrodes or sensors to
Kelly Robert J.
Wenger William K.
Bruce & McCoy
Cohen Lee
McCoy Ernest H.
Unilead International Inc.
LandOfFree
Universal electrocardiogram sensor positioning device and... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Universal electrocardiogram sensor positioning device and..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Universal electrocardiogram sensor positioning device and... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2961096