Underlay structure for increased crown stiffening

Resilient tires and wheels – Tires – resilient – Pneumatic tire or inner tube

Reexamination Certificate

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

C152S527000, C152S532000, C152S533000, C152SDIG001

Reexamination Certificate

active

06792986

ABSTRACT:

TECHNICAL FIELD
The present invention relates to a pneumatic radial ply tire and to the problem of crown lift-off (upward buckling of the tread) when a tire is inflated, underinflated or in the case of runflat tires, uninflated. More specifically, the present invention relates to tread underlays that serve to stiffen the tread and improve handling behavior, in both non-runflat tires, as well as runflat tires during inflated, underinflated or uninflated operation.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
A typical driver can usually feel when the handling of an automobile or light truck deteriorates when one or more tires (non-runflat as well as runflat tires) is underpressurized or underinflated. During underpressurized operation, the area of contact between the road and the tire tread changes in undesirable ways. Most specifically, the central region of the ground-contacting portion of the tread tends to lift off of the ground, or to buckle upwards, thereby reducing the tread's area of contact with the ground, which affects vehicle handling.
An additional problem associated with underinflated operation is cyclical flexure of the region of the ground-contacting portion of the tire's crown and sidewalls which, especially during high speed operation, can lead to heating and to fatigue failure of the tire components and structure such that the result can be crown failure of the tire.
The problem of crown lift-off is especially relevant to the design of runflat tires, also known as Extended Mobility Tires (EMTs), which are designed to provide continued operation service when underinflated or even when uninflated.
It is believed that the problem of tread lift-off is also relevant to the design of non-EMTs which can also suffer handling problems when operating in an underinflated mode, especially during high-speed operation when the problem of flexure and flexure-induced heating is greatest.
Therefore the goals of tire design include various structural designs that minimize the upward buckling of the central portion of the ground-contacting portion of the tread so as to enhance vehicle handling in all circumstances including, when the tire is at normal operating pressure, if the tire loses part of its pneumatic pressure or, in the case of EMTs, if the tire looses all of its inflated pressure.
In general, the term “runflat,” when applied to an EMT, means that the tire structure alone has sufficient strength to support the vehicle load when the tire is operated in the uninflated condition. That is, the sidewall and internal surfaces of the tire do not collapse or buckle onto themselves in the extreme manner associated with conventional tires that are uninflated. Current EMT design is directed toward providing rigid sidewalls and crown structures, rather than to the incorporation of internal supporting structures and devices to prevent the tire from collapsing. However, design consideration is also often given to the strengthening of the crown region.
Thus, among the goals of improving tire design, both of EMTs and non-EMTs, is that of stiffening the crown region against undesirable flexure during low-pressure or no-pressure operation. Among the ways to stiffen the crown is that of incorporating an underlay beneath the tread, radially inward of the belts and radially outward of the ply layers of the carcass.
For example, Cluzel, in U.S. Pat. No. 5,996,662, describes a “heavy vehicle” reinforcement “composed of at least two crossed working plies and at least one ply of circumferential cables arranged above the carcass ply.”
Colom, U.S. Pat. No. 6,082,426 describes the incorporation of a “crown reinforcement having at least two working crown plies made of inextensible cables, crossed from one ply to the other and forming angles of between 10° and 45° with the circumferential direction” and “an additional, axially continuous, ply formed of metallic elements oriented substantially parallel to the circumferential direction . . . place radially between the working plies” and extending laterally to 1.05 times the width of the breaker(s).
Abe, et al., in U.S. Pat. No. 4,506,718, describe an off-road vehicle tire having an extra layer of reinforced crown material designed to resist penetration by sharp objects.
Costa Pereira, et al., in U.S. Pat. No. 6,199,612, describe a “single layer of cushion compound between the cords of the carcass reinforcement that are furthest radially outward in the crown and eh cords of the belting that are furthest radially inward in the crown,” for the purpose of increasing crown rigidity without sacrificing losses to hysteresis; but no reinforcing cords are evident in this design of Pereira, et al.
Southarewsky, in U.S. Pat. No. 5,759,314, shows a crown reinforcement for a biased ply tire in which the reinforcement consists of “a member disposed between a first carcass and an additional carcass in the crown region of the tire for restricting the circumferential growth of the tire. The reinforcement member includes a plurality of cords oriented at zero degrees. The total circumferential strength of the reinforcement member is about 20% to 250% of the circumferential strength of the carcass plies.”
A further goal is to minimize the weight of such crown reinforcements, especially given that, because they are disposed radially distant from the axis of rotation, add to the tire's rotational moment of inertia about its main axis of rotation, which detracts from vehicle acceleration due to both the excess weight and the increased moment of inertia, as well as heat build up due to flexure of the additional material. The ideal crown stiffening invention has minimal weight. In EMT tires, the sidewall reinforcements tend to convey undesirable bending stresses to the crown region during low-pressure and no-pressure operation, which is also to be resisted by the crown reinforcement so as to give improved tire life under less-than-optimal-pressure operation.
With respect to conventional non-EMT tires, it is believed that the benefits of a crown and tread region that is resistant to upward flexure or liftoff during underinflated operation is, of course, improved vehicle handling during the interval until the tire can be reinflated to full pressure or otherwise repaired and reinflated to full design pressure.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to a pneumatic radial ply tire having a tread, a carcass with two sidewalls, two inextensible annular beads, a radial ply structure, a belt structure located between the tread and the radial ply structure, and an air impermeable innerliner. In addition, a crown stiffening underlay structure is disposed radially inward of and adjacent the belt structure and radially outward of and adjacent the radial ply structure. The underlay structure is comprised of a single flat strip of material disposed in a plurality of spaced apart circumferential windings about the tire carcass. The flat strip is comprised of a plurality of high modulus, essentially inextensible cords embedded more or less parallel to one another within an elastomeric matrix. The high modulus, essentially inextensible cords are made of a material selected from a group of materials exemplified by nylon, rayon, polyester, aramid, metal and glass. The overall lateral width of the underlay structure is less than the lateral width of the breaker structure. The plurality of essentially inextensible cords embedded within the elastomeric matrix of the underlay structure may or may not be cut at regular intervals of between about 10 cm and 20 cm, to enable the underlay strip to increase in length to accommodate the increase in circumference as the green tire carcass is blown up into a toroidal carcass shape. The cords are cut if the blow up change in diameter of the underlay strip is greater than the limited extensibility of the cord.
In a second embodiment, the present invention relates to a pneumatic radial ply tire having a tread, a carcass with two sidewalls, two inextensible annular beads, a radial ply structure, a belt structure located between the tread and the

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Underlay structure for increased crown stiffening does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Underlay structure for increased crown stiffening, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Underlay structure for increased crown stiffening will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3234166

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.