Umbilical cord blood collection

Surgery – Means and methods for collecting body fluids or waste material – Receptacle attached to or inserted within body to receive...

Reexamination Certificate

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

C604S400000, C604S408000, C128S854000, C600S573000

Reexamination Certificate

active

06179819

ABSTRACT:

FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to devices and methods for the collection of umbilical cord blood.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Recently, umbilical cord blood—the blood left in the umbilical cord and placenta after birth—has been recognized as a life-saving substance. The reason is that umbilical cord blood, like bone marrow, contains regenerative “stem” cells. Stem cells are the primitive cells from which other blood cells—white cells, red cells, and platelets—develop. Thus, they are the building blocks of the immune and blood cell systems. Cord blood stem cells are unique in that they are immature “naive” immune cells. When they are used in transplantation, they have reduced reactivity and are less likely to recognize the recipient as foreign. When transplanted into a sick person, even a single stem cell has the ability to regenerate the person's blood system. For this reason, stem cells are vital when a person's immune system has been weakened by radiation or chemotherapy, or by diseases that attack the immune system. Stem cells are highly effective against many diseases.
Since the potential of the stem cells in bone marrow has been recognized, about four thousand deaths per year are being prevented by bone marrow transplants. However, bone marrow is in short supply; the shortage of bone marrow amounts to 10,000-15,000 transplants per year that cannot be performed. As cord blood also contains regenerative “stem” cells, it is being used as an alternative to bone marrow. The number of cord blood transplants increased tenfold between 1994 and 1995. Many lives could be saved if umbilical cord blood were routinely banked and its additional stem cells became available for transplants.
Moreover, cord blood is much more effective than bone marrow for several reasons:
(1) It is less likely to trigger an adverse reaction when transplanted. The incidence of GVHD (Graft versus Host Disease) is about five times lower with cord blood as compared to bone marrow when the donor and recipient are unrelated (up to 90% GVHD for marrow, less than 20% with cord blood). When the donor and recipient are siblings, the rate of GVHD is ten times lower (2% for cord blood as compared to 20% for marrow). The engraftment rate for cord blood transplants is 85% overall.
(2) Cord blood stem cells are 8 to 11 times more “prolific” than bone marrow cells, and so better regenerate the body's blood system.
(3) Cord blood stem cells are better for gene herapies.
(4) No invasive procedures are needed to obtain ord blood.
(5) Cord blood is less likely to contain viruses than is bone marrow from adult donors, who have had a lifetime to acquire diseases.
Adults as well as children have been successfully treated with cord blood, and cord blood can be cryo-preserved in liquid nitrogen and remain usable for years. If a child's cord blood is preserved in this way, the grown individual can use his or her own stem cells later in life to fight various serious diseases. After age two, an individual's own cord blood is the most effective transplant material since it is less likely to be rejected than another individuals.
Cord blood is effective against numerous genetic and blood diseases and has the potential to become a valuable treatment for many others. Diseases which are now treatable with cord blood include: malignancies (leukemia, myeloma, and neuroblastoma); aplastic anemia; XKP; SCIDS; Wiskott-Aldrich Syndrome; thalessemia; Fanconi anemia; plasma cell disorders and inherited erythrocyte abnormities. At present, the majority of cord blood transplants are used to treat leukemia. Research is now under way on using cord blood to combat rheumatoid arthritis, AIDS, multiple sclerosis, sickle cell anemia, cancer of the lung and colon, and Hodgkin's lymphoma.
The International Cord Blood Foundation is promoting conservation and banking of cord blood. It is expected that greater awareness by physicians and expectant parents will increase the amount of retrieved cord blood and the number of lives saved. The National Institutes of Health, too, is spending millions of dollars to promote cord blood use.
However, the technology for extracting cord blood presents obstacles and obstructs the rapid acceptance of routinely banking all cord blood. The main problems are in (1) the convenience of collecting the blood and (2) obtaining an adequate amount of blood for both testing and banking.
Because there are so many uses for banked cord blood, because some therapies require large amounts, and because the cost of transporting and storing larger amounts as compared to smaller amounts is minimal, it is clear that the maximum possible amount of cord blood should be collected and stored. However, as will be seen from the discussion below, the present methods do not get all the available blood out of the umbilical cord.
The present standard delivery room protocol includes collecting and sending a small sample of umbilical cord blood to the laboratory shortly after delivery of the fetus for a variety of tests, including, but not limited to, hemoglobin, hematocrit, blood type and Rh factor, and antibody tests. Other laboratory studies on the cord blood specimen that could be performed include blood chemistries, blood cultures, HIV testing, testing for use of illegal drugs, such as cocaine, by the mother, lactate levels, blood gases such as oxygen and arbon dioxide saturation levels, and other studies.
Historically, this has been accomplished by attempting to direct a cord blood stream into opened laboratory test tubes and then capping the test tubes. Usually, spillage of cord blood occurs during this procedure, which is difficult for one person to perform.
The blood spillage is doubly bad because it not only wastes the precious blood but also increases the health workers' exposure to a potential HIV hazard. To decrease the amount of spilled blood, a funnel might be provided. However, to support a funnel and a test tube having a stopper while dripping blood would be even more awkward than merely filling a test tube. The used funnel would be another piece of contaminated trash. The test tube also ends up as contaminated trash and, if made of glass, it presents a puncture hazard in the event of breakage.
After a test tube or test tubes are filled with the desired amounts of blood and taken away, the attending pediatricians frequently call for a laboratory technician to come to the delivery room or newborn nursery soon after the birth to perform additional venipunctures or heel sticks on the newborn infant to obtain more blood samples for base line studies about the condition of the infant. These additional intrusions could of course be avoided by performing the same tests on cord blood, if more were available. However, the test tubes are gone by that time.
To collect larger amounts of cord blood for later tests or for long term preservation, the primitive and messy method of dripping blood into test tubes is too inefficient. At the present time bulk umbilical cord blood collection is performed mainly by using 50 cc syringes that contain a heparinized solution. The syringes are sent to pregnant women in the form of a kit. The expectant mother or parents are then responsible for bringing the kit to their delivery. The syringes, with needles attached, are given to the delivering doctor.
After delivery of the infant and cutting and clamping the cord the physician inserts the needle into the distal umbilical cord vein and slowly aspirates all available cord blood into the syringes. These syringes are then labeled for identification, needles are removed, the ends are capped, and they are placed into a zipper-locking plastic bag or bags. The bag is placed into an insulated mailing box, and they are mailed to a central processing laboratory. The syringes must be kept at room temperature through these steps.
This method requires a long time (about five minutes) and a substantial amount of effort. Three or four syringes are used (each being capped, labeled, etc.) and the needles must be inserted at num

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Umbilical cord blood collection does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Umbilical cord blood collection, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Umbilical cord blood collection will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2557116

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.