Ultrasound-mediated high-speed biological reaction and...

Chemistry: molecular biology and microbiology – Measuring or testing process involving enzymes or... – Involving nucleic acid

Reexamination Certificate

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

C427S002130, C427S004000, C435S001100, C435S001300, C435S040500, C435S040520, C435S325000, C422S020000

Reexamination Certificate

active

06291180

ABSTRACT:

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
The process of fixation forms the foundation for the preparation of tissue sections. It prevents or arrests autolysis and putrefaction, coagulates and stabilizes soluble and structural proteins, fortifies the tissues against the deleterious effects of subsequent processing and facilitates staining. Current methods of fixation rely on chemical agents, the most widely used being formaldehyde. Although autolysis is known to be retarded by cold and almost inhibited by heating to 60° C. (Drury and Wallington, 1980), heat as a form of tissue fixation has not been exploited in the diagnostic laboratory.
The use of routinely fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue sections for immunohistochemistry staining permits localization of a wide variety of antigens while retaining excellent morphologic detail. However, most chemical fixatives produce denaturation or masking of many antigens and degradation of RNA and DNA. In fact for some antigens, treatment of fixed tissue sections with proteases is required for their demonstration (Brandzaeg, 1982; Taylor, 1986). Furthermore, the introduction of antigen retrieval by heating tissue sections in a microwave oven (Shi et al., 1991) or pressure cooker (Norton et al., 1994; Miller et al., 1995) before immunostaining has been a major breakthrough in improving a result of no or weak immunoreactivity, particularly in suboptimally prepared tissue. However, while the optimal time for fixation varies with the chemical agent employed, this generally takes hours, approximately a day, to accomplish.
Fixative type and fixation time are known to influence 1) the preservation of tissue morphology (Baker, 1959), 2) the preservation of protein antigens for IHC (Williams et al., 1997), and 3) the preservation of nucleic acids for ISH (Weiss and Chen, 1991; Nuovo and Richart, 1989) and PCR (Ben-ezra et al., 1991). It is fortunate that formalin was found to be the best fixative for meeting these three criteria, as this is the fixative most commonly used in routine tissue fixation (Weiss and Chen, 1991; Williams et al., 1997; Nuovo and Richart, 1989).
Increasing the speed and reducing the time of fixation have been investigated using treatments of cold, heat, vacuum, microwave, ultrasound, and microwave combined with ultrasound. Tissues have been microwave irradiated for less than 10 seconds in the presence of chemical cross-linking agents (final solution temperature of 45-70° C.) (Login and Dvorak, 1985; Login et al., 1987). These MW fixation methods used heat to Pasteurize the tissue rather than to fix the tissue. The 10 seconds was not enough time to allow even penetration and complete reaction with the tissues. Also, 70° C. is not hot enough to inhibit all enzymes such as RNases (Sambrook et al., 1989). Furthermore, Azumi and Battifora reported that the improvement seen in antigen preservation in MW fixed tissues was not due to the microwave irradiation per se but rather to the graded alcohol dehydration steps in the tissue processor (Azumi et al. 1990). The exact amount of MW energy received by tissue was very difficult to control (Login and Dvorak, 1985; Azumi et al., 1990). Therapeutic ultrasound (800-880 kHz frequency and 1.4-2 W/cm
2
intensity) did not significantly improve the quality and time of fixation (Drakhli, 1967; Botsman and Bobrova, 1968; Obertyshev, 1987; Rozenberg, 1991) even when combined with MW energy (Shmurun, 1992). Cleaning ultrasound (destructive low frequency 40 kHz) was also used with MW. Disruptions, fissures and cracks of tissues treated for only 3 seconds with ultrasound irradiation (X 45 cycles) were observed when the specimens were examined by light microscopy (Yasuda et al., 1992). Our findings are the same as those reports that low frequency ultrasound exposure can lead to destruction of cell and tissue structure. This indicates that the safety range of low frequency ultrasound is relatively narrow.
In the past decade, molecular pathology has been rapidly developed by using new techniques such as immunohistochemistry (IHC), in situ hybridization (ISH), fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH), polymerase chain reaction (PCR), reverse transcription (RT)-PCR, and in situ-PCR. The most advanced techniques such as laser capture microdissection (LCM) (Emmert-Buck et al., 1996; Bonner et al., 1997; Fend et al., 1999a; Fend et al., 1999b), cDNA (Schena et al., 1995; DeRisi et al., 1996) and tissue microarrays (Kononen et al. (1998) have been developed for research and diagnosis of molecular pathology. Many genes and signaling pathways controlling cell proliferation, death and differentiation, as well as genomic integrity, have been measured by these techniques in a single experiment, revealing many new, potentially important cancer genes. However, the tissue blocks or sections used for analysis of molecular information of LCM and tissue microarray techniques have not fitted well with the classic method of tissue fixation—formalin fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE) tissue, which has provided the best morphology for pathologists throughout this century (Fend et al., 1999; Goldsworthy et al., 1999).
FFPE tissues have been extensively studied during the last two decades for molecular biology and molecular pathology. There have been many breakthroughs in these areas such as success in isolating the 1918 “Spanish” influenza virus RNA from an 80 year old FFPE tissue block (Taubenferger et al., 1997). However, there are many drawbacks in using FFPE tissue for molecular pathology, such as inconsistency in fixation condition, antigen masking, and RNA/DNA degradation. Even using the advanced microwave-antigen retrieval method (Shi et al., 1991), several CD markers have not worked with FFPE tissues, and the average length of RT-PCR products from FFPE tissues is 200 bp (Fend et al., 1999a; Ben-ezra et al., 1991; Foss et al., 1994; Krafft et al., 1997). All these drawbacks limit the use of LCM and tissue microarray techniques with FFPE tissues (Fend et al., 1999a; Goldsworthy et al., 1999).
Six to eighteen hours are required for routine fixation of surgical tissue specimens. Eight to fourteen hours are required for tissue processing. Additional times are required for embedding, sectioning, staining, and coverslipping of the specimen. A method which simultaneously permits rapid tissue fixation and processing, excellent morphologic detail, antigen preservation, and less RNA/DNA degradation would, therefore, be highly desirable in this molecular pathology era.
For the past three decades, microwave (MW) energy has sometimes been used for rapid tissue fixation (Mayers, 1970; Bernard, 1974; Login, 1978) and tissue processing (Boon et al., 1986) for light and electron microscopy. In the late 60's to early 90's, several Russian groups described a method in which therapeutic ultrasound (US) energy was used for tissue fixation and processing for light microscopy (Drakhli, 1967; Botsman and Bobrova, 1968; Obertyshev, 1987; Rozenberg, 1991) and for electron microscopy (Polonyi et al., 1984; Robb et al., 1991). MW energy combined with US energy was used in conjunction with chemical cross-linking agents to fix and process tissues for light (Shmurun, 1992) and for electron microscopy (Yasuda et al., 1992) at the same time. However, these technologies have not been successfully adopted in clinical diagnostic laboratories and controversial observations of these techniques have been reported (Azumi et al., 1990; Login et al., 1991; Azumi et al., 1991).
This invention relates to a method and apparatus for processing tissue samples or other biological samples for a wide variety of purposes. Tissue samples are analyzed for many purposes using a variety of different assays. Pathologists often use histochemistry or immunocytochemistry for analyzing tissue samples, molecular biologists may perform in situ hybridization or in situ polymerase chain reactions on tissue samples, etc. Often the sample to be analyzed will be frozen or embedded in paraffin and mounted on a microscope slide. A typical immunocytochemistry assay requires a series of many

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Ultrasound-mediated high-speed biological reaction and... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Ultrasound-mediated high-speed biological reaction and..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Ultrasound-mediated high-speed biological reaction and... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2452686

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.