Two stage traffic scheduling

Details Two stage traffic scheduling Two stage traffic scheduling

2008-04-30

2011-10-25

Moe, Aung S (Department: 2474)

Multiplex communications

Pathfinding or routing

Switching a message which includes an address header

C370S230100, C370S235000, C370S412000

Reexamination Certificate

active

08045561

ABSTRACT:
A first traffic flow directed to a first wireless device is received. A second traffic flow directed to a second wireless device is received. These traffic flows comprise at least a first service flow classification and a second service flow classification. The first traffic flow and the second traffic flow are scheduled based on the first service flow classification and the second flow classification. This produces first and second device scheduled flows. The first and second device scheduled flows are classified into a plurality of flow classes. The plurality of flow classes comprises at least a first flow class and a second flow class. The first scheduled flow and the second scheduled flow are scheduled based on the first flow class and the second flow class. This produces an aggregate traffic flow.

REFERENCES:
patent: 6775231 (2004-08-01), Baker et al.
patent: 6975638 (2005-12-01), Chen et al.
patent: 7027414 (2006-04-01), Walsh et al.
patent: 7151776 (2006-12-01), Iyer et al.
patent: 7283468 (2007-10-01), Hill et al.
patent: 2003/0119556 (2003-06-01), Khan et al.
patent: 2004/0013089 (2004-01-01), Taneja et al.
patent: 2005/0175014 (2005-08-01), Patrick
patent: 2006/0242319 (2006-10-01), Sang et al.
patent: 2007/0104130 (2007-05-01), Venkatachalam
patent: 2007/0147341 (2007-06-01), Izumikawa et al.
patent: 2007/0153803 (2007-07-01), Lakshmanamurthy et al.
patent: 2007/0287467 (2007-12-01), Oswal et al.
patent: 2008/0002592 (2008-01-01), Yegani et al.
patent: 2008/0188231 (2008-08-01), Zhu et al.
Eric Andrews, “Migrating to Flatter, All-IP Wireless Networks,” Converge! Network Digest, Jan. 16, 2008, 7 pages, http://www.convergedigest.com/bp/bp1.asp?Id=502&ctgy=Mesh.
Jasleen Sahni, et al., “Scheduling CBR Flows: FIFO or Per-flow Queuing?,” 15 pages, University of Texas at Austin and Ensim Corporation, Austin Texas, Mountain View, California, http://www.nossday.org/1999/papers/37-1992261996.pdf.
Dr. Ehab S. Al-Shaer, “Multimedia Networking TDC 573,” Lecture # 5-a: Differentiated Services (DiffServ), pp. 1-28, School of Computer Science & Telecommunications, DePaul University, Chicago, Illinois, http://www.mnlab.cs.depaul.edu/˜ehab/Courses/TDC573/PDF/5-diffserv.pdf.
Kathleen Nichols, et al., “Definition of the Differentiated Services Field (DS Field) in the IPv4 and IPv6 Headers,” Dec. 1998, pp. 1-20, Cisco Systems, Torrent Networking Technologies, and EMC Corporation, http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2474.
Steven Blake, et al., “An Architecture for Differential Services,” Dec. 1998, pp. 1-36, Torrent Networking Technologies, EMC Corporation, Sun Microsystems, Nortel UK, Bell Labs Lucent Technologies, and Lucent Technologies, http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2475.
Juha Heinanen, et al., “Assured Forwarding PHB Group,” Jun. 1999, pp. 1-11, Telia Finland, Cisco Systems, Lucent Technologies, and MIT LCS, http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2597.
Bruce Davie, et al., “An Expedited Forwarding PHB (Per-hop Behavior),” Mar. 2002, pp. 1-16, Cisco Systems, Motorola, Tellabs, EPFL, TRW, PMC—Sierra, Nortel Networks, and Lucent Technologies, http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3246.

Affiliated with

Also associated with

Rating

Two stage traffic scheduling does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Two stage traffic scheduling, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Two stage traffic scheduling will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

Comments { 0 }

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-4295104