Fluid handling – With indicator – register – recorder – alarm or inspection means – Fluid pressure responsive indicator – recorder or alarm
Reexamination Certificate
2001-02-21
2002-11-12
Chambers, A. Michael (Department: 3753)
Fluid handling
With indicator, register, recorder, alarm or inspection means
Fluid pressure responsive indicator, recorder or alarm
C137S015090, C251S026000, C251S030010, C060S403000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06478048
ABSTRACT:
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Field of the Invention
This invention relates to solenoid valves, and more particularly to an arrangement of solenoid valves in instrumentation and process control systems of a plant.
2. Background Information
Modem process or manufacturing plants contain innumerable operating components. These components are tied together to form systems controlled by instrumentation and control systems containing sensors and controllers. The instrumentation and control systems on such plants not only serve to control the functions of the various components in order to achieve the desired process conditions, but they also provide the facility to safely modify or discontinue the operation of all or a portion of the plant's systems in order to avoid an unsafe situation or condition.
Safety systems or configurations require routine testing in order to verify that they continue to properly perform the functions for which they were intended. From an operational and economic point of view, they also should not modify or discontinue the operation of the plant system unnecessarily. One of the means by which such safety systems function is by the securing or diverting of the supply of a certain process fluid or the supply of motive power to a plant system or component of a plant system.
One of the means by which these safety functions may be accomplished is through the use of solenoid operated valves. In operation, the solenoid valves of such systems serve to isolate and/or vent off the fluid or pneumatic source from the system when the solenoid valve changes state or position (e.g. when the valve is de-energized by switches or process monitoring sensors coupled thereto). The plant system and any system controlled thereby is then placed in a configuration designated for safety.
In many cases, the operation of individual solenoid valves may not be tested without actually tripping the system and undesirably modifying or discontinuing the operation of the plant system. Moreover, various configurations available for actuating safety shutoff valves generally require a trade-off between competing characteristics of safety and spurious trip rate.
For example, a “1 out of 2” voting solenoid valve arrangement generates a process modification (i.e. shutdown) when at least one of the two solenoids changes state. Such a configuration provides relatively high safety, with an associated relatively high spurious trip rate (i.e., a single faulty valve or sensor may generate a false trip).
A “2 out of 2” voting solenoid valve arrangement requires actuation of two solenoid valves in order to trigger a modification of the plant system. This configuration has a relatively low spurious trip rate, since both solenoids must fail or otherwise change state to generate a spurious trip. However, the solenoid valves of this arrangement must be tested frequently to insure safety, since failure of only a single solenoid valve may effectively prevent the system from shutting down, etc.
Quad voting solenoids provide a balance of safety and reliability, however the quad configuration utilizes four solenoids in a relatively complex arrangement that tends to be difficult to install, test, and maintain.
Thus, there exists a need for a voting solenoid configuration which combines the features of relatively high safety with relatively low spurious trip rate and does not require the plant system to be shut down during testing.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
According to an embodiment of this invention, a voting solenoid arrangement is adapted to selectively couple a fluid supply with a fluid receiver, the voting solenoid arrangement including first, second and third solenoid valves disposed in fluid communication with one another, each of the solenoid valves being alternately actuatable between first and second states so that a change of state of any two of the solenoid valves is adapted to alternately couple and de-couple the fluid supply with the fluid receiver.
Another aspect of the present invention includes a method for selectively coupling a fluid supply with a fluid receiver, the method comprising the steps of providing first, second and third solenoid valves each being alternately actuatable between first and second states; and disposing the solenoid valves in fluid communication with one another so that a change of state of any two of the solenoid valves is adapted to alternately couple and de-couple the fluid supply with the fluid receiver.
According to still another aspect, this invention includes a two way valve including a voting solenoid arrangement adapted to selectively couple a fluid input with a fluid output, the voting solenoid arrangement including first, second and third solenoid valves disposed in fluid communication with one another, each of the solenoid valves being alternately actuatable between first and second states so that a change of state of any two of the solenoid valves is adapted to alternately couple and de-couple the fluid input with the fluid output.
According to yet another aspect, this invention includes a method for fabricating a two-way valve for selectively coupling a fluid input with a fluid output, the method including providing first, second and third solenoid valves, each being alternately actuatable between first and second states, and disposing the solenoid valves in fluid communication with one another such that a change of state of at least any two of the solenoid valves is adapted to alternately couple and de-couple the fluid input with the fluid output.
The above and other features and advantages of this invention will be more readily apparent from a reading of the following detailed description of various aspects of the invention taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.
REFERENCES:
patent: 2851047 (1958-09-01), Eller
patent: 3488029 (1970-01-01), Durbin
patent: 4102129 (1978-07-01), Maes
patent: 4316486 (1982-02-01), Tandrup et al.
patent: 4319609 (1982-03-01), Debrus
patent: 4637587 (1987-01-01), Kuhnlein
patent: 5142483 (1992-08-01), Basham et al.
patent: 5621164 (1997-04-01), Woodbury et al.
patent: 5626070 (1997-05-01), Sorbel
patent: 5665898 (1997-09-01), Smith et al.
patent: 5741166 (1998-04-01), Newman
patent: 6155282 (2000-12-01), Zachary et al.
patent: 2928-005 (1980-02-01), None
patent: 60-11792 (1985-01-01), None
Barron David
Chambers A. Michael
Sampson Richard L.
Triconex, Incorporated
LandOfFree
Two out of three voting solenoid arrangement does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Two out of three voting solenoid arrangement, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Two out of three voting solenoid arrangement will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2957411