Prime-mover dynamo plants – Turbogenerators
Reexamination Certificate
1998-10-27
2001-07-24
Thorpe, Timothy S. (Department: 3746)
Prime-mover dynamo plants
Turbogenerators
C417S053000, C417S044100, C290S046000, C074S041000, C318S723000, C318S801000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06265786
ABSTRACT:
TECHNICAL FIELD
This invention relates to the general field of turbogenerator controls and more particularly to an improved high speed turbogenerator control system for providing electrical power to motors which have power requirements that normally vary in a repetitive manner over time.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
There are many industrial and commercial applications that utilize electrical motors to produce repetitive axial motions. The electrical motor's rotary motion can be converted into axial motion by any number of mechanisms such as cams, cranks, scotch yokes, or cable drums just to name a few. In any such application, the electrical power requirement of the motor is inherently variable and is cyclically locked to the repetitive axial motion. The motor power in these applications varies both due to inertial effects (the need to accelerate and decelerate the axially moving components of the system and the need to accelerate and decelerate the rotationally moving components of the system) and due to the work effects (changes in the work performed by the axially moving components as a function of their axial position and velocity). The magnitude of the motor power variation with time can be many times the average power requirement of the motor. Both the inertial effects and the work effects can cause the motor to function as a generator which produces electrical power at various times in the system's cyclical motion.
An elevator is one well-known example of an electrical motor producing axial motion wherein the motor's electrical power requirements vary with the passenger load, the axial velocity of the elevator and the axial acceleration/deceleration of the elevator. Deliberate deceleration or braking can be achieved by recovering the excess energy in the elevator's mechanical system (e.g. during the descent of a heavily loaded elevator) utilizing regeneration to convert that mechanical energy into electrical energy which can go back into an electrical distribution system.
Another example of a motor producing repetitive axial motion is a pump-jack type oil well. Also known as a walking beam (a large beam arranged in teeter totter fashion) or a walking-horse oil well, the pump-jack oil well generally including a walking beam suitably journaled and supported in an overhanging relationship to the oil well borehole so that a string of rods (as long as two miles) can be attached to the reciprocating end of the walking beam with the other end attached to a lift pump chamber at the bottom of the bore hole. A suitable driving means, such as an electrical motor or internal combustion engine, is connected to a speed reduction unit which drives a crank which in turn is interconnected to the other end of the walking beam by a pitman.
Conventionally, pump-jack oil wells utilize an induction motor powered by constant frequency, three-phase electrical power from a utility grid. The pump-jack pumping cycle varies the induction motor's speed only slightly as allowed by plus or minus a few percent of motor slip. However, the induction motor power typically varies over the pumping cycle by about four (4) times the average motor power level. At two (2) points in the pumping cycle, the motor power requirement peaks and at two (2) other points, the motor power requirements are at a minimum. Typically, at one of these minimum power requirement points in the pumping cycle, the induction motor extracts enough kinetic energy and/or work from the moving masses of the well to be able to function as a generator and produce electrical power which must be absorbed by the utility grid.
Whether the pump-jack oil well is driven by an induction motor or by an internal combustion engine, there is excess mechanical energy at some point(s) in the pumping cycle which must be absorbed to prevent excessive velocity induced stresses in the pump-jack oil well moving parts. When a pump-jack oil well is powered by an internal combustion engine, engine compression is the means by which this energy is dissipated (compression losses) while in the normal utility grid powered induction motor system, the induction motor is periodically driven at overspeed causing it to return power to the utility grid.
A micro turbogenerator with a shaft mounted permanent magnet motor/generator can be utilized to provide electrical power for a wide range of utility, commercial and industrial applications. While an individual permanent magnet turbogenerator may only generate 24 to 50 kilowatts, powerplants of up to 500 kilowatts or greater are possible by linking numerous permanent magnet turbogenerators together. Peak load shaving power, grid parallel power, standby power, and remote location (stand-alone) power are just some of the potential applications for which these lightweight, low noise, low cost, environmentally friendly, and thermally efficient units can be useful.
The conventional power control system for a turbogenerator produces constant frequency, three-phase electrical power that closely approximates the electrical power produced by utility grids. If a turbogenerator with a conventional system for controlling its power generation were utilized to power a pump-jack type oil well, the turbogenerator's power capability would have to be sufficient to supply the well's peak power requirements, that is, about four (4) times the well's average power requirement. In other words, the turbogenerator would have to be about four (4) times as large, four (4) times as heavy, and four (4) times as expensive as a turbogenerator that only had to provide the average power required by the oil well rather than the well's peak power requirements.
There are other inherent difficulties present if a turbogenerator with a conventional power control system is used to provide electrical power for a pump-jack type of oil well. If, for example, the oil well is in the part of the pumping cycle where it normally generates rather than consumes power, the operating speed of the rotating elements of the turbogenerator will tend to increase. The fuel control system of the power control system will attempt to reduce the fuel flow to the tubogenerator combustor in order to prevent the turbogenerator's rotating elements from overspeeding which, in turn, risks quenching the flame in the combustor (flame out). A minimum fuel flow into the combustor must be maintained to avoid flame out. This results in a minimum level of power generation, which together with the power produced by the oil well itself, must be deliberately dissipated as wasted power by the turbogenerator system, usually with a load resistor but sometimes with a pneumatic load, either of which will reduce the turbogenerator system efficiency.
Also, when the power requirements for the oil well fall below the well's peak requirement, the conventional turbogenerator control system will reduce the turbogenerator speed and the turbogenerator combustion temperature. Since the present systems do not have any means to dissipate excess power, the rapidly fluctuating load levels and unloading operation produce undesirable centrifugal and thermal cycles stresses in many components of the turbogenerator system which will tend to reduce turbogenerator life, reliability and system efficiency.
When a pump-jack type oil well is powered by constant frequency electrical power from a utility grid or a conventionally controlled turbogenerator, the oil extraction pumping rate may not be sufficient to keep up with the rate at which oil seeps into the well. In this case, potential oil production and revenues may be lost. Alternately, the oil extraction pumping rate may be greater than the rate at which oil seeps into the well. In this case, the oil well may waste power when no oil is being pumped or it may be necessary to shut down the oil well for a period of time to allow more oil to seep into the well.
For the reasons stated above, [the conventional turbogenerator control system is not] what is needed is an improved technique for providing power [ge
Bosley Robert W.
Edelman Edward C.
Lampe Steven W.
Peticolas Brian W.
Capstone Turbine Corporation
Gartenberg Ehud
Irell & Manella LLP
Thorpe Timothy S.
LandOfFree
Turbogenerator power control system does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Turbogenerator power control system, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Turbogenerator power control system will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2499387