Turbine fluid flow resistor

Pipes and tubular conduits – With flow regulators and/or baffles

Reexamination Certificate

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

C138S039000, C604S118000

Reexamination Certificate

active

06719011

ABSTRACT:

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Field of the Invention
The present invention is related to devices for controlling aspirant fluid flow during ophthalmic surgery. More particularly, the present invention is directed to an aspirant fluid flow resistor for increasing the resistance to fluid flow in an aspiration path during ophthalmic surgery.
2. Description of Related Art
During eye surgery, especially cataract surgery, surgeons experience a tension between the amount of vacuum or aspiration to be used on a patient's eye and the time period in which the surgeon has to respond to events that may occur during surgery. Surgeons typically prefer higher vacuum levels to provide a higher holding force for the cataract. However, these higher vacuum levels result in the need for rapid response times by the surgeon when events such as occlusion occur in the aspiration line. The higher the vacuum levels, the quicker events occur and thus the potential for serious problems increases, such as the tearing of the capsular bag.
There are known devices for increasing the resistance to aspirant fluid flow to allow a surgeon to use higher vacuum levels, i.e., higher holding force, with a slower response time. These devices help the surgeon have the benefits of higher vacuum levels while limiting or minimizing the risks by providing the surgeon with greater time to respond to surgical events than would be possible without resistance to the aspirant flow. Coiled tubing is one example that increases the flow resistance. It has been asserted that increased resistance is achieved by passing fluid through a series of coil bends because fluid drops in pressure as it flows through a bend. However, a downside to the coiled tubing is that the chances of aspirant clogging within the coils is increased due to the elliptical cross-section and bent kinks that may occur in the tubing. In addition, the resistance of the coiled tubing is a function of the coil radius.
Another device that increases resistance to aspirant flow is a non-clogging orifice that collects waste and is commonly referred to phaco-guard. The phaco-guard is a large cross-sectional area filter funneled down to a small orifice. It allows limited clogging of the filter and is based on the assumption that the entire filter area will not clog. However, the filter may still clog.
Therefore, it would be desirable to have a compact, easily manufactured fluid flow resistor for increasing resistance to fluid flow and an aspiration path.


REFERENCES:
patent: 1001722 (1911-08-01), Wilcox et al.
patent: 2270141 (1942-01-01), Potter
patent: 3119263 (1964-01-01), Perkins
patent: 3217539 (1965-11-01), Owen et al.
patent: 3433071 (1969-03-01), Homrig
patent: 3543579 (1970-12-01), Watkins
patent: 3948099 (1976-04-01), Geisow
patent: 4189941 (1980-02-01), Loesch
patent: 4316392 (1982-02-01), Leber
patent: 4395919 (1983-08-01), Peters
patent: 4700579 (1987-10-01), Hall
patent: 4921477 (1990-05-01), Davis
patent: 5106367 (1992-04-01), Ureche et al.

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Turbine fluid flow resistor does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Turbine fluid flow resistor, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Turbine fluid flow resistor will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3229728

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.