Imperforate bowl: centrifugal separators – With means for furnishing auxiliary fluid to material or... – Energy of fluid utilized for driving bowl
Reexamination Certificate
1998-10-21
2001-04-03
Cooley, Charles E. (Department: 1723)
Imperforate bowl: centrifugal separators
With means for furnishing auxiliary fluid to material or...
Energy of fluid utilized for driving bowl
C494S036000, C494S049000, C494S084000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06210311
ABSTRACT:
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to centrifugal filters for filtering particulates from a liquid using centrifugal force.
2. Description of the Related Art
Many types of fluids contain particulates which need to be filtered out for subsequent use of the fluid. Examples of such fluids include medical and biological fluids, machining and cutting fluids, and lubricating oils. With particular reference to an internal combustion engine, a lubricating oil such as engine oil may contain particulates which are filtered out to prevent mechanical or corrosive wear of the engine.
Diesel engine mechanical wear, especially that relating to boundary lubricated wear, is a direct function of the amount of particulates in the lubricating oil. A particulate which is extremely detrimental to engine wear is soot, formed during the combustion process, and deposited into the crankcase through combustion gas blow-by and piston rings scraping of the cylinder walls. Soot is a carbonaceous polycyclic hydrocarbon which has extremely high surface area whereby it interacts chemically with adsorptive association with other lubricant species. Particle sizes of most diesel engine lubricant soot is between 100 Angstroms and 3 microns. Ranges of concentration are between 0 and 10 percent by weight depending on many factors. Because engine wear will dramatically increase with the soot level in the lubricating oil, engine manufacturers specify a certain engine drain oil interval to protect the engine from this type of mechanical wear. Current sieve type filters do not remove sufficient amounts of soot to provide soot related wear protection to the engine.
Centrifugal filters for lubricant filtration are generally known. Current production centrifugal lubricant oil filters are powered by hero turbines, which are part of the oil filter canister, or through direct mechanical propulsion. Hero turbine powered filters are limited by the supplied oil pressure from the engine, and only can be operated up to maximum speeds around 4000 revolutions per minute (RPM) with oil pressures nominally at less than 40 psi. In addition, hero turbine powered filters pass oil through the filter canister as it migrates toward the attached hero turbine jets. Therefore, the lubricant mean residence time is less than a few minutes. None of the currently available centrifugal filters which operate on the basis of a hero turbine provide satisfactory soot removal rates. Soot removal from engine lubricating oil requires greater G forces and longer residence times than is demonstrated with currently commercially available hero turbine powered filters.
Is also known to drive a centrifugal filter using a mechanical linkage from a turbine. The turbine receives a flow of engine exhaust air and drives a mechanical output shaft which nozzle impinges upon the turbine and causes the filter to rotate about the axis of rotation.
An advantage of the present invention is that the turbine is directly driven by a pressurized fluid to rotate the filter at a speed which is sufficient to effect centrifugal separation.
Another advantage is that the turbine is impacted upon by the pressurized fluid substantially orthogonal to the axis of rotation of the filter, thereby improving efficiency by substantially eliminating force vectors on the turbine parallel to the axis of rotation.
Yet another advantage is that the turbine may be configured as rigidly attached to, removably attached to or integral with the filter.
Still another advantage is that the nozzle may be disposed either radially within or outside of the turbine.
A further advantage is that the nozzle may be adjustably positioned relative to a fixed or variable geometry turbine.
REFERENCES:
patent: 2053856 (1936-09-01), Weidenbacker
patent: 2321144 (1943-06-01), Jones
patent: 2335420 (1943-11-01), Jones
patent: 2485390 (1949-10-01), Langmuir
patent: 3273324 (1966-09-01), Jennings
patent: 3335946 (1967-08-01), Putterlik
patent: 3430853 (1969-03-01), Kirk et al.
patent: 3791576 (1974-02-01), Bazil
patent: 3879294 (1975-04-01), Ellis et al.
patent: 4106689 (1978-08-01), Kozulla
patent: 4142671 (1979-03-01), Ivin et al.
patent: 4150580 (1979-04-01), Silkebakken et al.
patent: 4165032 (1979-08-01), Klingenberg
patent: 4221323 (1980-09-01), Courtot
patent: 4492631 (1985-01-01), Martin
patent: 4557831 (1985-12-01), Lindsay et al.
patent: 5085783 (1992-02-01), Feke et al.
patent: 5637217 (1997-06-01), Herman et al.
patent: 5707519 (1998-01-01), Miller et al.
patent: 5779618 (1998-07-01), Onodera et al.
patent: 5785849 (1998-07-01), Mules
patent: 6017300 (2000-01-01), Herman
patent: 1089355 (1967-11-01), None
patent: 362643 (1972-12-01), None
patent: 564884 (1977-07-01), None
patent: 869822 (1981-10-01), None
patent: 83/02406 (1983-07-01), None
Analytical Engineering, Inc.
Cooley Charles E.
Taylor & Aust P.C.
LandOfFree
Turbine driven centrifugal filter does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Turbine driven centrifugal filter, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Turbine driven centrifugal filter will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2529686