Land vehicles – Wheeled – Running gear
Reexamination Certificate
2002-04-22
2003-02-18
Dickson, Paul N. (Department: 3616)
Land vehicles
Wheeled
Running gear
C280S089100, C280S090000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06520519
ABSTRACT:
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
This invention relates to vehicle steering systems and more particularly to a device for holding the steerable wheels of a vehicle, such as a motor home, bus, truck, automobile or the like, so that a center steering position is maintained in spite of spurious steering inputs, such as those caused by variable crosswinds, crown curvature or slant of the highway, or other factors tending to adversely affect vehicle steering by the driver.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
The steering systems of highway vehicles and the like are designed primarily for driver control. In these systems, the steering force required on the steering wheel and the ratio between steering wheel movement and movement of the steerable ground wheels depend upon the characteristics of the particular vehicle and the conditions under which it will usually be operated. A wide variety of extraneous forces can act on a vehicle steering system and spurious steering inputs caused by these forces must be dealt with satisfactorily in order to provide stable and controllable steering of a vehicle. As vehicle speed increases, the effects of any spurious steering inputs are magnified, making it necessary for the driver to exercise more precise and careful driving control.
Vehicles with steering systems having positive caster generally track relatively straight ahead and generally resist normal steering inputs away from center, including those of the driver. Intentional turning maneuvers by the driver therefore require sufficient turning force to overcome this positive resistance to movement away from center. When the driver relaxes the turning force applied to the steering wheel, a positive caster system has a definite tendency to return to its straight ahead position, although it may overshoot the neutral or center position if the steering wheel is entirely released.
While positive caster is desirable in some respects, it is not without compromises over the full steering spectrum. For example, the adverse effects of strong gusty cross winds are usually more pronounced with large amounts of positive caster. As its name would imply, the vehicle tends to caster towards the side of the roadway to which it is being pushed by the wind. Thus, the adverse steering inputs caused by crosswinds are directly related to the amount of positive caster offset, which is a classic example of having to balance a benefit with a detriment. The small amount of stability gained from castering the steerable wheels on a non-windy day may be paid for many times over when driving in a crosswind because of the destabilizing effect of the crosswind caused by positive caster offset. Positive caster offset also allows steering inputs from rutted and other imperfect roadway surfaces to steer back against the driver and thereby cause road wander, which is a universal driving complaint, particularly by driver's of heavy vehicles such as trucks and motor homes. Similarly, a high crown at the center of the roadway or a slanted roadway can cause vehicles to turn toward the edge of the roadway, that is, in the downhill direction. In addition, generous positive caster provides significant resistance to small radius turns, which can make city driving quite fatiguing. These adverse effects are some of the negative aspects of achieving steering stability through generous amounts of positive caster.
For the lack of a more advanced method, steerable wheel castering has been accepted by the industry as a low-cost method of achieving steerable wheel returnability. Accordingly, many over-the-road vehicles are provided with generous amounts of positive caster. Not much thought has been given to the self-defeating side effects of steerable wheel castering. The failure of the industry to recognize the critical need to provide directional stability by replacing steerable wheel castering with another method of achieving steerable wheel returnability may go down in history as one of the longest enduring vehicle design oversights.
Thus, a highly important consideration that has long been overlooked by the industry is that steerable wheel castering is directly responsible for road wander, crowned road steering wheel pull and cross wind steering problems. Keeping a vehicle tracking straight and under control currently requires an inordinate amount of driver steering corrections to counteract the adverse side effects of castered wheels. The repetitive task of making thousands of precise steering corrections mile after mile weighs heavily on a driver's physical and mental well-being, and may result in extreme driving fatigue. Thus, vehicle directional stability can best be achieved by stabilizing the on-center behavior of the steerable wheels with a more suitable method than the traditional steerable wheel castering used on many current production vehicles.
Another drawback of prior art steering systems is that spurious inputs transmitted from the roadway through the steerable wheels affect substantially the entire steering assembly before encountering any stabilizing resistance from the steering wheel. The transmission of these inputs between the steerable wheels and the steering wheel causes the interconnecting components of the steering system to repeatedly oscillate between states of tension and compression. Such oscillations cause wear and slack in ball joints and other connections and have long been considered a primary source of stress fatigue which can lead to premature failure of various steering system components. Mechanical slack due to worn parts can also be a cause of steering system oscillations and vehicle wandering that require constant corrections and therefore produce driver fatigue.
The ideal driving situation is therefore one where the steering system inherently causes the vehicle to travel in an unswerving straight line unless the driver intentionally turns the vehicle in another direction. Thus, the ideal steering system would require relatively little attention from the driver as the vehicle progresses along a straight line path down the roadway. From a steering standpoint, the vehicle should not respond to anything but the driver's steering commands and these must be of sufficient magnitude to overcome a significant resistance to turning away from center. In the absence of a steering input by the driver, the vehicle should literally do nothing but progress straight ahead.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The invention provides a center stabilizer assembly for improved on-center holding of the steerable wheels, and significantly reduces driver fatigue because it results in a major reduction in driver steering inputs. The stabilizer assembly is easily activated by the driver while driving the vehicle, and its activation makes driving more pleasurable and less fatiguing. The stabilizer assembly comprises linkage means of variable length that extends between the steerable wheels and an axle or frame member such that the length of the linkage means defines the center position of the steering system. The linkage means comprises a resistance assembly that provides a resistance force for resisting steering forces tending to move the steerable wheels to either side of the center position, and a trim assembly for changing the center position to be maintained by the resistance assembly.
The trim assembly comprises a trim piston, a trim cylinder providing first and second trim chambers one on each side of the trim piston, and a trim fluid system for providing a flow of fluid to and from each of the trim chambers. The trim fluid system includes trim conduits, a fluid accumulator and a remotely actuated trim valve for controlling trim fluid flow. The trim valve is operable between a closed position for preventing the fluid flow to hold the trim piston in a locked position, and an open position for allowing the piston to move to a new locked position in the trim cylinder. Movement of the trim piston causes fluid flow to one of the trim chambers and fluid flow from the other of the trim chambers. This fluid flow permits the length of the linka
Belser, Jr. Townsend M
Dickson Paul N.
Dunn David R.
Nexsen Pruet Jacobs & Pollard LLC
LandOfFree
Trimming apparatus for steer wheel control systems does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Trimming apparatus for steer wheel control systems, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Trimming apparatus for steer wheel control systems will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3139914