Transurethral volume reduction of the prostate (TUVOR)

Details Transurethral volume reduction of the prostate (TUVOR) Transurethral volume reduction of the prostate (TUVOR)

2001-02-07

2002-12-10

Derakshani, Philippe (Department: 3754)

Surgery

Means for introducing or removing material from body for...

Treating material introduced into or removed from body...

C606S171000, C606S180000

Reexamination Certificate

active

06491672

ABSTRACT:

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
This invention relates to apparatus and a method for the removal and treatment of prostate tissue to treat conditions associated with diseases or disorders resulting in obstruction of the uro-genital systems.
As men age, their prostate glands typically enlarge due to growth of intraprostatic paraurethral glands tissue (prostate adenoma) obstructing the flow of urine through the urethra. This condition is known as benign prostatic hypertrophy (“BPH”), and results in a partial or total inability to urinate. The incidence of symptomatic BPH for men in their fifties is approximately 50%, rising to 90% by age 85. About 25% of men in the United States will be treated for BPH by age 80.
Traditional surgical therapy for BPH has involved open enucleation or transurethral resection of the prostate. Surgical treatment of BPH is generally reserved for patients with severe symptoms or for those who have developed urinary retention, renal damage caused by BPH, or those with significant potential complications if treatment were withheld. These painful procedures usually result in long-term recovery although the patient may be subjected to traumatic side-effects.
The most common surgical procedure, Transurethral Resection of the Prostate (“TURP”), involves the removal of the prostate's innermost core in order to enlarge the caliber of the prostatic urethra. The average TURP procedure costs approximately $12,000 and requires a hospital stay of approximately 3 to 4 days. During this period the patient is burdened with a Foley drainage catheter and bag. TURP side-effects include impotence (up to 30%), retrograde ejaculation, and short-term or permanent incontinence.
Suprapubic or Retropubic (Open) Prostatectomy (SPP/RPP) involves surgical removal of the enlarged prostate via an incision in the lower abdomen, usually requiring a 5 to 7 day hospital stay. Patients are allowed to return to work 2 to 3 weeks after the surgery. Open prostatectomy may result in impotence (up to 30% of cases), retrograde ejaculation and incontinence.
Transurethral Incision of the Prostate (TUIP) is an endoscopic surgical procedure in which one to three cuts is made in the prostate to relax the constriction on the prostatic urethra. TUIP is limited to prostates below 30 grams in size and requires 2 days of hospitalization. TUIP patients may experience short-term incontinence, and on rare occasions, retrograde ejaculation.
Transurethral Vaporization of the Prostate (TUVP) is a procedure for ablating the prostatic tissues by vaporization using an electrosurgical roller. The cost and the hospital stay for this procedure is similar to that of the TURP. Although TUVP causes less bleeding than TURP, the impotence rates are not dissimilar.
In balloon dilatation, a catheter with a high-pressure balloon at the end is inserted through the urethra and into the prostatic urethra. The balloon is then inflated to stretch and tear the prostatic urethra and to enlarge its caliber. Clinical studies have demonstrated a high rate of obstructive recurrence. This therapy has largely been abandoned.
Laser assisted Prostatectomy includes two similar procedures, Visual Laser Ablation of the Prostate (V-LAP) and Contact Laser Ablation of the Prostate (C-LAP). Typically, the procedure is performed in the hospital under either general or spinal anesthesia, and at least an overnight hospital stay is required. In V-LAP, the burnt prostatic tissue then necroses, or dies, and over four to twelve weeks is sloughed off during urination. In C-LAP, the prostatic and urethral tissue is burned on contact and vaporized. The major drawbacks to these procedures include their high cost equipment and high re-treatment rates.
TransUrethral Microwave Therapy (TUMT) is based on a catheter inserted into the urethra, on which a microwave antenna is situated at the level of the prostate. The urethra can be spared by cooling, but will otherwise be destroyed. Scarring of the prostatic tissue enlarges the urethral lumen. The drawback of this treatment is long catherization time (1-6 weeks) and high-re-treatment rates.
TransUrethral Needle Ablation (TUNA) is performed by transurethrally inserting two radio-frequency antennas into the prostatic tissue for heat damage creation. The drawbacks involved are a long catheterization period (up to 6 weeks) and very high re-treatment rates. Interstitial Laser Coagulation (ILC) is very similar to TUNA but the heat source is a laser.
High Intensity Focused Ultrasound (HIFU) brings a beam of ultrasound into a tight focus at a selected depth within the prostate, generating temperatures of 80-100° C. and causing coagulation necrosis. The energy is delivered transrectally, and a catheter is inserted into the urethra for enhancing the treatment. The drawbacks of this treatment is the major cost of the equipment and long catheterization periods.
Water Induced Thermotherapy (WIT) is similar to non-urethra sparing microwave treatments. The heat damage is created by heating a balloon at the prostatic urethra and by heating the prostatic tissue. It has the same drawbacks as microwave treatments.
Holmium Laser Prostatectomy is comparable to open prostatectomy. During this treatment, as in open surgery, the entire hypertrophied gland is enucleated (but endoscopically) and dropped into the bladder. This gland should be morselated for removal. The drawbacks of this treatment are the cost of the equipment and the long learning curve.
In addition to the above, a few general limitations emerge regarding alternative therapies. By targeting tissue killing to regions surrounding the urethra, some relief of compressive urethral obstruction is achieved. However, with the exception of Holmium Laser Prostatectomy, none of these procedures directly removes material. All of these techniques rely on the body's response to injury and inflammation (the reticuloendothelial system (RES)) to slowly remove necrotic cells and “clean-up” the area. As such, all of these techniques take several months to ultimately lead to a maximal effect, which is also limited. In many of these techniques no actual net tissue removal or reduction occurs. Rather, the injury may lead to localized scarring and fibrosis which may ultimately lead to obstruction recurrence. The response to injury is individually variable and lesser degrees of relief are often achieved. Patients who are treated by thermotherapy typically recover quickly, but need to be catheterized for at least one week post-treatment to maintain urine flow. Even after catheter removal, irritating urinary symptoms frequently persist during the period of tissue sloughing and healing.
Drug therapy is sometimes an option. Some drugs are designed to shrink the prostate by inhibiting or slowing the growth of prostate cells. Other drugs are designed to relax the muscular tissue in the prostate capsule and bladder neck to relieve urethral obstruction. Current drug therapy (including Finasteride Therapy, Alpha Blocker Therapy and Phytotherapy) generally requires daily administration for the duration of the patient's life, and are known to cause dizziness and fainting, decreases in blood-pressure, impotence, retrograde ejaculation or a reduction in the volume of ejaculated sperm. Furthermore, the effectiveness of these drug therapies in long-term treatment of BPH has not been proven scientifically.
To date, the most effective surgical intervention for BPH, is TURP. This procedure is invasive, requiring regional or general anesthesia, several days of hospitalization and post-treatment placement of a drainage catheter. TURP frequently presents a high operative cost and risk for many patients. The potential disadvantages and limitations of TURP include bleeding, urinary tract infections, urethral irritation, discomfort, occasional urinary incontinence, sexual dysfinction. Despite these limitations, TURP is currently the gold standard of therapy for BPH.
It is therefore an object of the present invention to provide apparatus and materials for treatment of BPH.
It is a further object of the pre

Affiliated with

Also associated with

Rating

Transurethral volume reduction of the prostate (TUVOR) does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Transurethral volume reduction of the prostate (TUVOR), we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Transurethral volume reduction of the prostate (TUVOR) will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

Comments { 0 }

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2967453