Material or article handling – Horizontally swinging load support – Swinging about pivot
Reexamination Certificate
2001-06-05
2004-06-22
Underwood, Donald W. (Department: 3652)
Material or article handling
Horizontally swinging load support
Swinging about pivot
C901S015000, C198S346200, C074S490030
Reexamination Certificate
active
06752584
ABSTRACT:
TECHNICAL FIELD
The present invention relates to processing microelectronic workpieces and handling such workpieces within an environment of a processing machine.
BACKGROUND
Microelectronic devices, such as semiconductor devices and field emission displays, are fabricated on and/or in microelectronic workpieces using several different apparatus (“tools”). Many such processing apparatus have a single processing station that performs one or more procedures on the workpieces. Other processing apparatus have a plurality of processing stations that perform a series of different procedures on individual workpieces or batches of workpieces. The workpieces are generally handled within the processing apparatus by automatic handling equipment (i.e., robots) because microelectronic fabrication requires extremely clean environments, very precise positioning of the workpieces, and conditions that are not suitable for human access (e.g., vacuum environments, high temperatures, chemicals, etc.).
An increasingly important category of processing apparatus are plating tools that plate metals and other materials onto workpieces. Existing plating tools use automatic handling equipment to handle the workpieces because the position, movement and cleanliness of the workpieces are important parameters for accurately plating materials onto the workpieces. The plating tools can be used to plate metals and other materials (e.g., ceramics or polymers) in the formation of contacts, interconnects and other components of microelectronic devices. For example, copper plating tools are used to form copper contacts and interconnects on semiconductor wafers, field emission displays, read/write heads and other types of microelectronic workpieces. A typical copper plating process involves depositing a copper seed layer onto the surface of the workpiece using chemical vapor deposition (CVD), physical vapor deposition (PVD), electroless plating processes, or other suitable methods. After forming the seed layer, copper is plated onto the workpiece by applying an appropriate electrical field between the seed layer and an anode in the presence of an electrochemical plating solution. The workpiece is then cleaned, etched and/or annealed in subsequent procedures before transferring the workpiece to another apparatus.
Single-wafer plating tools generally have a load/unload station, a number of plating chambers, a number of cleaning chambers, and a transfer mechanism for moving the microelectronic workpieces between the various chambers and the load/unload station. The transfer mechanism can be a rotary system having one or more robots that rotate about a fixed location in the plating tool. One existing rotary transfer mechanism is shown in U.S. Pat. No. 6,136,163 issued to Cheung, et al., which is herein incorporated by reference in its entirety. Alternate transfer mechanisms include linear systems that have an elongated track and a plurality of individual robots that can move independently along the track. Each of the robots on a linear track can also include independently operable end-effectors. Existing linear track systems are shown in U.S. Pat. No. 5,571,325 issued to Ueyama, et al., PCT Publication No. WO 00/02808, and U.S. patent application Ser. Nos. 09/386,566; 09/386,590; 09/386,568; and 09/759,998, all of which are herein incorporated in their entirety by reference. Many rotary and linear transfer mechanisms have a plurality of individual robots that can each independently access most, if not all, of the processing stations within an individual tool to increase the flexibility and throughput of the plating tool.
The processing tools used in fabricating microelectronic devices must meet many performance criteria. For example, many processes must be able to form components that are much smaller than 0.5 &mgr;m, and even on the order of 0.1 &mgr;m. The throughput of these processing tools should also be as high as possible because they are typically expensive to purchase, operate and maintain. Moreover, microelectronic processing tools typically operate in clean rooms that are expensive to construct and maintain. The throughput, and thus the value of most processing tools, is evaluated by the number of wafers per hour per square foot (w/hr/ft
2
) that the processing tool can produce with adequate quality. Therefore, plating tools and many other processing tools require fast, accurate transfer mechanisms and an efficient layout of processing chambers to accomplish acceptable throughputs.
One concern of existing processing apparatus is that the wafers may collide with one another as the transfer mechanism handles the wafers within a tool. Because many processing apparatus have a plurality of individual robots that move independently from each other to access many processing chambers within a single apparatus, the motion of the individual robots must be orchestrated so that the workpieces do not collide with each other or components of the tool. This typically requires complex algorithms in the software for controlling the motion of the workpieces, and the complexity of the software often necessitates significant processor capabilities and processing time. The complex algorithms accordingly increase the cost of the processing tools and reduce the throughput of workpieces. Additionally, errors in determining the position of the workpieces, executing the software, or calibrating the system can result in collisions between workpieces. Thus, it would be desirable to avoid collisions with workpieces in a manner that does not adversely impact other parameters of the processing apparatus.
Another concern of existing processing apparatus is that the transfer mechanisms typically have complex mechanical and electrical assemblies with several components. This increases the risk that a component may malfunction, causing downtime of the entire processing machine and/or collisions that damage the workpieces. Therefore, it would be desirable to reduce the complexity of the transfer mechanisms.
Yet another aspect of existing transfer mechanisms is that they may not provide sufficient freedom of motion of the workpieces. Although many robots have been developed that have six degrees of freedom, many of these robots are not used in processing apparatus for fabricating microelectronic workpieces because the additional degrees of freedom increase the complexity of the systems. As a result, many existing transfer mechanisms limit one or more motions of the robots, such as limiting the vertical motion of the robots. It will be appreciated that it would be desirable to maintain the freedom of motion for the robots while also reducing the probability of collisions between the workpieces and the complexity of the robots.
SUMMARY
The present invention is directed toward transfer devices for handling microelectronic workpieces, apparatus for processing microelectronic workpieces, and methods for manufacturing and using such devices. Several embodiments of integrated tools comprise a single robot, dual end-effector transfer device that is expected to increase the flexibility of designing integrated tools. By using a single robot, less space is needed within the cabinet for the robot. As a result, more space can be used for the processing chambers so that larger processing chambers can be used in the same or very similar foot print as smaller chambers. This is useful as many device fabricators transition from using 200 mm wafers to 300 mm wafer because 300 mm tools can be used in approximately the same area as 200 mm tools, and the 300 mm tools can have the same number of processing chambers as the 200 mm tools. Thus, several embodiments of single robots with dual end-effectors in accordance with the invention allow designers to more easily replace 200 mm tools with 300 mm tools.
Another feature is that each of the end-effectors of the single robot can service processing chambers in either row inside tool. The integrated tools can accordingly have several different configurations of processing chambers that can be assembled on a “custom basis.
Harris Randy
Woodruff Daniel J.
Perkins Coie LLP
Semitool Inc.
Underwood Donald W.
LandOfFree
TRANSFER DEVICES FOR HANDLING MICROELECTRONIC WORKPIECES... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with TRANSFER DEVICES FOR HANDLING MICROELECTRONIC WORKPIECES..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and TRANSFER DEVICES FOR HANDLING MICROELECTRONIC WORKPIECES... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3339480