Dynamic magnetic information storage or retrieval – Head – Core
Reexamination Certificate
2001-09-17
2003-12-02
Letscher, George J. (Department: 2653)
Dynamic magnetic information storage or retrieval
Head
Core
Reexamination Certificate
active
06657814
ABSTRACT:
BACKGROUND
1. Field of the Invention
This invention pertains to magnetic recording, and particularly to transducing heads for recording and reproduction of signals on/from magnetic tape.
2. Related Art and Other Considerations
In the time frame from about the year 1955 to about the year 1970, tranducing heads for helical scan tape drives were designed with simple construction. In these simple heads the two magnetic pole halves (which were joined to form a magnetic gap therebetween) were of uniform thickness such that the effective magnetic headwidth, H
1
1
, was equal to the physical tape contact width, H
2
1
, as shown in FIG.
1
.
As recorded track densities increased (circa early 1970s), smaller effective magnetic headwidths were required. In view of the requirement for smaller headwidths, it was not practical for tribological reasons to reduce the physical tape contact width by the same amount. Consequently, manufacturers developed a new design (illustrated in
FIG. 2
) wherein one of the two magnetic pole pieces was micro-machined to create a smaller effective magnetic headwidth, H
1
2
, while providing a larger physical tape contact width, H
2
2
. In this regard, see also U.S. Pat. No. 3,813,693 to Gooch et al.
When narrow-track azimuth digital recording formats (e.g., D-2) were developed in the mid-1980s, a construction similar to that of
FIG. 3
was successfully used. In
FIG. 3
, &agr; represents the azimuth angle. The FIG.
3
-tyype structure worked well because the physical tape contact width, H
2
3
, was less than the width of three adjacent recorded tracks, 3T
3
(i.e. H
2
3
<3T
3
).
FIG. 4
illustrates how a read head of
FIG. 3
would be positioned relative to the pattern of recorded alternating azimuth tracks each of width T
3
. As understood from
FIG. 4
, the desired signal is recovered from Region I where the effective magnetic read headwidth overlaps the desired same-azimuth recorded track, and the undesired signals from Regions II and III are greatly reduced by the well-known azimuth-loss effect since the recorded transitions in these areas are not parallel to the effective magnetic headwidth nor to the edges of the wider magnetic pole half.
Ultra-narrow-track azimuth digital recording formats, such as that involved in the Mammoth™ tape drive technology developed by Exabyte Corporation, were developed in the early-1990s. In this ultra-narrow-track azimuth digital recording format, a read head design similar to that of
FIG. 3
was no longer useful, since again for tribological reasons, the physical tape contact width, H
2
5
, could not be made less than the width of three adjacent recorded tracks. Consequently, the physical tape contact width, H
2
5
, would now overlap 5 or more adjacent tracks as shown in FIG.
5
. Since the edges of the wider magnetic pole half now overlapped adjacent tracks where the transitions are parallel to these edges, the undesired signals picked up from these areas (Regions IV and V) are not reduced by the azimuth-loss effect and the SNR of the system suffers greatly.
To overcome the problems described above, manufacturers developed another new head type where both of the magnetic pole halves are micro-machined as shown in FIG.
6
. While the construction of
FIG. 6
eliminates the undesired signal pick-up from Regions IV and V, it has some disadvantages compared to the design of
FIG. 3. A
first such disadvantage is that the magnetic efficiency of the head is reduced since the cross-sectional area of the magnetic material near the magnetic gap area is reduced. A second disadvantage is that the design requires micro-machining both of the magnetic pole halves. A third disadvantage is that alignment of the two magnetic pole halves relative to each other is critical—any misalignment between the magnetic pole halves reduces the effective magnetic headwidth, H
1
.
What is needed, therefore, and an object of the present invention, is a transducing head that has higher magnetic efficiency and improved manufacturability compared to the conventional ultra-narrow track read head design.
BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
A transducing head for a magnetic tape recorder comprises a first magnetic pole and a second magnetic pole positioned to form a gap therebetween. The first magnetic pole has a first magnetic pole width H
3
along the gap and the second magnetic pole has a second magnetic pole width H
1
along the gap. The first magnetic pole width H
3
and the second magnetic pole width H
1
are formed to satisfy the relation H
1
<H
3
<3T<H
2
, wherein H
2
is a physical tape contact width of the transducing head and 3T is a width of three adjacent recorded tracks traversed by the head.
REFERENCES:
patent: 3813693 (1974-05-01), Gooch et al.
patent: 4843495 (1989-06-01), Georgis et al.
patent: 4845577 (1989-07-01), Georgis et al.
patent: 5050018 (1991-09-01), Georgis et al.
patent: 5680269 (1997-10-01), Georgis et al.
patent: 5812337 (1998-09-01), Tanaka et al.
U.S. patent application 09/492,345, filed Jan. 2000, entitled “Power Supply Circuit and Method of Calibration Therefor”.
Magnusson Steven L.
Nichtl-Pecher Wolfgang
Exabyte Corporation
Letscher George J.
Nixon & Vanderhye P.C.
LandOfFree
Transducing head for tape drive does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Transducing head for tape drive, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Transducing head for tape drive will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3176338